On 09/27/2013 01:47 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Ahh ok. Well, if I run the 11/24, I obviously won't be running that
stack. :) I may run an 11/44 instead.
Running M+ on an 11/23 or 11/24 (the only systems without I/D space that
M+ supports) is perhaps not the most wonderful experience anyway. Since
you don't have split I/D-space on those systems, system pool becomes
really scarce. And that is not fun.
An 11/44 is so much better.
Yeah I suppose so.
I've never run Plus on anything. I've run plain M on lots of stuff
though; it's fine on an 11/23. I guess Plus is a lot heavier for all of
its additional functionality.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 09/27/2013 03:10 PM, Lee Gleason wrote:
An 11/44 is so much better.
Without a doubt - the next best thing to an 11/70.
Yes. I will run either an 11/44 or an 11/24 through the winter, on
HECnet. I may have the 11/70 up periodically, but I don't yet have an
Ethernet interface installed...that's a tough one because I'll need to
set up an Unibus expansion chassis to accommodate one.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Running M+ on an 11/23 or 11/24 (the only systems without I/D space that M+ supports) is perhaps not the most wonderful experience anyway. Since you don't have split I/D-space on those systems, system pool becomes really scarce. And that is not fun.
I read in old issues of the MultiTasker that it didn't take much to get M+ to run on an 18 bit address space non I&D system.
They did mention that there wasn't a lot of pool left...
Haven't had occasion to try it yet.
An 11/44 is so much better.
Without a doubt - the next best thing to an 11/70.
--
Lee K. Gleason N5ZMR
Control-G Consultants
lee.gleason at comcast.net
My most often used Digital Server 5305 (white box equivalent of the as 1200) lost one of its power supplies. It was replaced with a spare and Osmium is running again. I' m thinking of repairing the damaged unit but need schematics for that. Any pointers for them, or a service manual?
Hans
On 2013-09-27 19:08, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 09/27/2013 05:24 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Ok. I think I sorted it out now. That was an ugly bug... :-)
MIM should be stable now, and with an improved TCP/IP, in case anyone
ever notice...
I'm actually hoping to run your RSX IP stack at some point. I just
got another PDP-11/24 recently...Will RSX-11M/Plus run on a machine
without split I/D space?
Yes, M+ will run on an 11/24. It is a supported system. However, my
TCP/IP will not run on that. It requires split I/D-space.
Ahh ok. Well, if I run the 11/24, I obviously won't be running that
stack. :) I may run an 11/44 instead.
Running M+ on an 11/23 or 11/24 (the only systems without I/D space that M+ supports) is perhaps not the most wonderful experience anyway. Since you don't have split I/D-space on those systems, system pool becomes really scarce. And that is not fun.
An 11/44 is so much better.
Johnny
On 09/27/2013 05:24 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Ok. I think I sorted it out now. That was an ugly bug... :-)
MIM should be stable now, and with an improved TCP/IP, in case anyone
ever notice...
I'm actually hoping to run your RSX IP stack at some point. I just
got another PDP-11/24 recently...Will RSX-11M/Plus run on a machine
without split I/D space?
Yes, M+ will run on an 11/24. It is a supported system. However, my
TCP/IP will not run on that. It requires split I/D-space.
Ahh ok. Well, if I run the 11/24, I obviously won't be running that
stack. :) I may run an 11/44 instead.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 09/27/2013 12:30 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Gregg Levine wrote:
Hello!
Okay Cory what did you do?
I lost my member information in The Great Zpool Failure of 2013.
It is really, really hard to trash a zpool. What happened? (probably
best off-list) Did you tell me about that?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Hello!
That's not what happened. Check your mailbox.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Gregg Levine wrote:
Hello!
Okay Cory what did you do?
I lost my member information in The Great Zpool Failure of 2013.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Gregg Levine wrote:
Hello!
Okay Cory what did you do?
I lost my member information in The Great Zpool Failure of 2013.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> writes:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
FYI, I passed along your interests in having EISNER connected to HECnet
to Mr. Dale Coy. He thought it would be a great idea but suggested that
the DECUServe community be consulted.
I've begun discussion in the DECUServe Notes Conference: DECUSERVE_FORUM,
under the title: The Pros and Cons of Hitchhiking^JHECnet
You are invited to join DECUServe (if you are not already a subscriber)
to add your input to that discussion. Dale's informed me that DECUServe
system is to be moved from its current location the the near future. If
there is interest in havin EISNER connected with HECnet, it would be best
to incorporate this into the system's moving/relocation plans.
I would join but I forgot my old password and I haven't gotten the email
about the new account yet.
It looks to me like you'd signed up twice:
CORY SMELOSKY SMELOSKY [610,22102] US404663 Normal 4 DISK_USER:[DECUSERVE_USER.SMELOSKY]
CORY SMELOSKY SMELOSKY_C [610,23265] US405411 Normal 4 DISK_USER:[DECUSERVE_USER.SMELOSKY_C]
I can set one or both of these to a new passwrod for you.
Well, I'm using SMELOSKY_C currently, can you purge SMELOSKY please?
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
