Mark. A good way to "debug" the bridge is to send it SIGUSR1, upon which
it will dump to stdout a bunch of information.
Apart from that, you cannot see if the bridge is talking to your machine
or not, since the bridge is meant to be totally transparent from the
DECnet point of view.
One other thing: what is your ip address (or dns) and port number, so I
can check if my config file still have the right values...?
Johnny
Mark Wickens wrote:
I think I may have been experiencing multiple points of failure. Steve has kindly brought up the MULTINET tunnel to his systems, but it
looks like the link to MIM is still down:
NCP>show known circuits
Known Circuit Volatile Summary as of 22-SEP-2010 08:01:44
Circuit State Loopback Adjacent
Name Routing Node
ISA-0 on
TCP-0-19 on 19.41 (SG1)
What should I be seeing on the bridge to indicate that BUBBLE is talking
to it correctly? I'm presuming when the link is up I should see a
routing node against ISA-0 on the above circuit list?
Regards, Mark.
I think I may have been experiencing multiple points of failure.
Steve has kindly brought up the MULTINET tunnel to his systems, but it
looks like the link to MIM is still down:
NCP>show known circuits
Known Circuit Volatile Summary as of 22-SEP-2010 08:01:44
Circuit State Loopback Adjacent
Name Routing Node
ISA-0 on
TCP-0-19 on 19.41 (SG1)
What should I be seeing on the bridge to indicate that BUBBLE is talking
to it correctly? I'm presuming when the link is up I should see a
routing node against ISA-0 on the above circuit list?
Regards, Mark.
Fixed.
On 21 Sep 2010, at 17:42, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Guilty as charged. I was experimenting with my end of the bridge a couple of months ago, and commented out some lines that wasn't active at the time. You were among them, and I haven't turned them on again afterward. Sorry. Fixed in a few seconds...
Johnny
On 2010-09-21 23:37, Mark Wickens wrote:
Hi Guys,
My link to MIM via the bridge program isn't currently working, and I
can't work out why.
Any ideas?
I turned debugging on the bridge and got the following output:
Adding router ''local''. bfffcd18:79
Adding router ''update''. 1913ee82:4711
Adding DECnet bridge local.
Trying to match local
Matching against: local
Found match: local == local
Adding DECnet bridge update.
Trying to match update
Matching against: local
Matching against: update
Found match: update == update
Adding LAT bridge local.
Trying to match local
Matching against: local
Found match: local == local
Adding LAT bridge update.
Trying to match update
Matching against: local
Matching against: update
Found match: update == update
Host table:
0: local 0.0.0.0:0 (Rx: 0 Tx: 0 (Drop rx: 0)) Active: 1 Throttle: 0(000)
1: update 130.238.19.25:4711 (Rx: 0 Tx: 0 (Drop rx: 0)) Active: 1
Throttle: 0(000)
Hash of known destinations:
Adding new hash entry. Port is 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Adding new hash entry. Port is 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
I'm still down too....
Sampsa
On 21 Sep 2010, at 17:42, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Guilty as charged. I was experimenting with my end of the bridge a couple of months ago, and commented out some lines that wasn't active at the time. You were among them, and I haven't turned them on again afterward. Sorry. Fixed in a few seconds...
Johnny
On 2010-09-21 23:37, Mark Wickens wrote:
Hi Guys,
My link to MIM via the bridge program isn't currently working, and I
can't work out why.
Any ideas?
I turned debugging on the bridge and got the following output:
Adding router ''local''. bfffcd18:79
Adding router ''update''. 1913ee82:4711
Adding DECnet bridge local.
Trying to match local
Matching against: local
Found match: local == local
Adding DECnet bridge update.
Trying to match update
Matching against: local
Matching against: update
Found match: update == update
Adding LAT bridge local.
Trying to match local
Matching against: local
Found match: local == local
Adding LAT bridge update.
Trying to match update
Matching against: local
Matching against: update
Found match: update == update
Host table:
0: local 0.0.0.0:0 (Rx: 0 Tx: 0 (Drop rx: 0)) Active: 1 Throttle: 0(000)
1: update 130.238.19.25:4711 (Rx: 0 Tx: 0 (Drop rx: 0)) Active: 1
Throttle: 0(000)
Hash of known destinations:
Adding new hash entry. Port is 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Adding new hash entry. Port is 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Guilty as charged. I was experimenting with my end of the bridge a couple of months ago, and commented out some lines that wasn't active at the time. You were among them, and I haven't turned them on again afterward. Sorry. Fixed in a few seconds...
Johnny
On 2010-09-21 23:37, Mark Wickens wrote:
Hi Guys,
My link to MIM via the bridge program isn't currently working, and I
can't work out why.
Any ideas?
I turned debugging on the bridge and got the following output:
Adding router ''local''. bfffcd18:79
Adding router ''update''. 1913ee82:4711
Adding DECnet bridge local.
Trying to match local
Matching against: local
Found match: local == local
Adding DECnet bridge update.
Trying to match update
Matching against: local
Matching against: update
Found match: update == update
Adding LAT bridge local.
Trying to match local
Matching against: local
Found match: local == local
Adding LAT bridge update.
Trying to match update
Matching against: local
Matching against: update
Found match: update == update
Host table:
0: local 0.0.0.0:0 (Rx: 0 Tx: 0 (Drop rx: 0)) Active: 1 Throttle: 0(000)
1: update 130.238.19.25:4711 (Rx: 0 Tx: 0 (Drop rx: 0)) Active: 1
Throttle: 0(000)
Hash of known destinations:
Adding new hash entry. Port is 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Adding new hash entry. Port is 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Hi Guys,
My link to MIM via the bridge program isn't currently working, and I
can't work out why.
Any ideas?
I turned debugging on the bridge and got the following output:
Adding router ''local''. bfffcd18:79
Adding router ''update''. 1913ee82:4711
Adding DECnet bridge local.
Trying to match local
Matching against: local
Found match: local == local
Adding DECnet bridge update.
Trying to match update
Matching against: local
Matching against: update
Found match: update == update
Adding LAT bridge local.
Trying to match local
Matching against: local
Found match: local == local
Adding LAT bridge update.
Trying to match update
Matching against: local
Matching against: update
Found match: update == update
Host table:
0: local 0.0.0.0:0 (Rx: 0 Tx: 0 (Drop rx: 0)) Active: 1 Throttle: 0(000)
1: update 130.238.19.25:4711 (Rx: 0 Tx: 0 (Drop rx: 0)) Active: 1
Throttle: 0(000)
Hash of known destinations:
Adding new hash entry. Port is 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Adding new hash entry. Port is 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
Setting existing hash to bridge 0
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Jason Stevens <neozeed at gmail.com> wrote:
One thing I noticed on my 'glorious' time warner connection (that's all they
have here) is that with all my equipment set to auto detect I was getting
less then 1MB on my 'high speed' connection.
But forcing my router to 100MB half duplex gets me 45MB in bursts.....
Sometimes it's worth exploring options on those wan links, but you'd need to
break into the hotel system to do so....
Not that I'd ever do something like that....
What is more annoying is that all the TCP/UDP port filtering is done at the
ISP level.. I have to buy a tunnel out from Sweden to get full IP access...
now how's that for a joke?
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Gregg,
That might be true but I'm miles out of DC in VA.
If internet access (and their rooms are cool too) is important to you* and
for some god-forsaken reason you need to be stuck in this suburban hellhole
for business, stay at Sierra:
Hotel Sierra in Sterling, Virginia
45520 Dulles Plaza
Sterling, VA 20166
1703/435-9002 or 1-800-474-3772, http://www.hotel-sierra.com/
Sampsa
* I was seriously getting 14-20 mbps down. It's a cool hotel anyway, only
problem is the bar only had beer and wine. License issue. Oh and it's in the
middle of suburban industrial park hell - everything is fake and 20 miles
apart from each other, and I have no car.
On 19 Sep 2010, at 15:40, Gregg Levine wrote:
Incidentally all hotels in the DC area are stuck with that because the
Feds insist on abusing the networks where they are centrally located.
It gets better closer to NYC, by the time you're staying in a NJ hotel
you're getting closer to your home's settings.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
Hello!
Jason, do what I do. Complain. The bird behind TWCNY may be something
of a fritter head but he does listen to complaints. I've been offered
that service as part of their triple play game, I turned it down
because I don't trust their technicians to understand things
concerning different operating systems play properly. AT&T now Covad
entirely does understand things up to a point. (Where that is, is
something for later.)
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
Also, drove around (in a cab) DC a bit last night, it really has the feeling of a New Rome architecturally. Very imposing, grandiose and believable.
Met a lovely guy, physicist working on some missile guidance systems etc, obviously never been anywhere awful like Algeria etc and he believed, sincerely, that America can bring peace, democracy and Disney movies to the whole world, i.e. that the Pax Americana is achievable, sort of a modern Pax Romana.
I wanted to point out that the Romans solved their Middle Eastern problems by nailing 5000 people to the walls of Jerusalem but didn't have the heart or how Carthage ended up :)
Sampsa
One thing I noticed on my 'glorious' time warner connection (that's all they have here) is that with all my equipment set to auto detect I was getting less then 1MB on my 'high speed' connection.
But forcing my router to 100MB half duplex gets me 45MB in bursts.....
Sometimes it's worth exploring options on those wan links, but you'd need to break into the hotel system to do so....
Not that I'd ever do something like that....
What is more annoying is that all the TCP/UDP port filtering is done at the ISP level.. I have to buy a tunnel out from Sweden to get full IP access... now how's that for a joke?
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Gregg,
That might be true but I'm miles out of DC in VA.
If internet access (and their rooms are cool too) is important to you* and for some god-forsaken reason you need to be stuck in this suburban hellhole for business, stay at Sierra:
Hotel Sierra in Sterling, Virginia
45520 Dulles Plaza
Sterling, VA 20166
1703/435-9002 or 1-800-474-3772, http://www.hotel-sierra.com/
Sampsa
* I was seriously getting 14-20 mbps down. It's a cool hotel anyway, only problem is the bar only had beer and wine. License issue. Oh and it's in the middle of suburban industrial park hell - everything is fake and 20 miles apart from each other, and I have no car.
On 19 Sep 2010, at 15:40, Gregg Levine wrote:
>
> Incidentally all hotels in the DC area are stuck with that because the
> Feds insist on abusing the networks where they are centrally located.
> It gets better closer to NYC, by the time you're staying in a NJ hotel
> you're getting closer to your home's settings.
> -----
> Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
> "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
Gregg,
That might be true but I'm miles out of DC in VA.
If internet access (and their rooms are cool too) is important to you* and for some god-forsaken reason you need to be stuck in this suburban hellhole for business, stay at Sierra:
Hotel Sierra in Sterling, Virginia
45520 Dulles Plaza
Sterling, VA 20166
1703/435-9002 or 1-800-474-3772, http://www.hotel-sierra.com/
Sampsa
* I was seriously getting 14-20 mbps down. It's a cool hotel anyway, only problem is the bar only had beer and wine. License issue. Oh and it's in the middle of suburban industrial park hell - everything is fake and 20 miles apart from each other, and I have no car.
On 19 Sep 2010, at 15:40, Gregg Levine wrote:
Incidentally all hotels in the DC area are stuck with that because the
Feds insist on abusing the networks where they are centrally located.
It gets better closer to NYC, by the time you're staying in a NJ hotel
you're getting closer to your home's settings.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
