On 2012-12-29 15:53, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2012-12-29 15:42, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Johnny,
Is everything ok on the bridge - whenever I turn mine on I get about
10-20 hashes / sec from your side and it kills my routing totally.
What do you mean by "get about 10-20 hashes / sec"?
By the way, just though I'd mention that I'm not seeing any obvious problems on MIM, or the bridge at update.
Just as a silly reality check - check that you have configured your DECnet with a large enough value in the executive for maximum boradcast routers... As the bridge looks just like any ethernet segment, you need to keep in mind that this ethernet segment is getting pretty big, with quite a few area routers on the same ethernet segment...
Johnny
Hmm, everything is back to normal now.
Strange.
On 29 Dec 2012, at 16:54, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Debug output:
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
20-30 / sec, at least.
Didn't use to be this rapid.
Sampsa
---
Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com>
On 29 Dec 2012, at 16:53, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2012-12-29 15:42, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Johnny,
Is everything ok on the bridge - whenever I turn mine on I get about 10-20 hashes / sec from your side and it kills my routing totally.
What do you mean by "get about 10-20 hashes / sec"?
Johnny
Debug output:
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
Setting existing hash to bridge 1
20-30 / sec, at least.
Didn't use to be this rapid.
Sampsa
---
Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com>
On 29 Dec 2012, at 16:53, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2012-12-29 15:42, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Johnny,
Is everything ok on the bridge - whenever I turn mine on I get about 10-20 hashes / sec from your side and it kills my routing totally.
What do you mean by "get about 10-20 hashes / sec"?
Johnny
On 2012-12-29 15:42, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Johnny,
Is everything ok on the bridge - whenever I turn mine on I get about 10-20 hashes / sec from your side and it kills my routing totally.
What do you mean by "get about 10-20 hashes / sec"?
Johnny
On 2012-12-29 14:32, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
My bridge goes NUTS when I connect to update - I get dozens of hashes per second and my DECNET routing breaks completely.
Any ideas why this is happening? Am I the only one with this problem?
Could be that someone that is connected have something broken. That tends to create havoc. Typical things would be looping back incoming packets, or creating a circular topology.
I have not checked all mails in my box yet. I'll get back if this still is an issue...
Johnny
Johnny,
Is everything ok on the bridge - whenever I turn mine on I get about 10-20 hashes / sec from your side and it kills my routing totally.
---
Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com>
On 2012-12-29 05:36, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Hey Johnny,
I made some errors when submitting some nodes previously
9.15 should be TSTBD1, and 9.21 should be MELODY
Apologies, I've had to deal with moving node names around and it got a bit messy. ;)
TSTBD1 was already correct, but I fixed MELODY.
Johnny
On 2012-12-29 05:31, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 28 Dec 2012, at 23:29, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
I took some quick cell phone pics the other day for someone else who
asked. The lighting was poor and things weren't well-staged, but here
they are:
http://www.neurotica.com/misc/vax7000/
I'm sorry for the poor quality. I'll take proper pics when I get
things organized a bit in here.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
How loud is the 7720?
Nowhere near an 8650. :-)
Johnny
Hello Stuart,
Yes we did try and in fact it revealed an important bug which is fixed. What we failed to resolve, as I recall, was an apparent problem with some adjacencies yo-yoing up and down. I too was having a similar problem at the time, but that turned out to be a bad switch I had on my network, the adjacency is pretty solid now. I would be very happy to try again. Please download the latest from CodePlex (route20.codeplex.com) and build it. Someone has also told me it won t compile on FreeBSD so I am going to see if I can fix that too.
Regards
Rob
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Stuart Martin Sent: 29 December 2012 13:31 To: hecnet at update.uu.se Subject: Re: [HECnet] HECnet mapping project
On 26 December 2012 09:10, Rob Jarratt <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
> On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist > Sent: 26 December 2012 01:24 > To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE > Cc: sampsa at mac.com > Subject: Re: [HECnet] HECnet mapping project >
> On 2012-12-26 02:13, sampsa at mac.com wrote: > > > > On 26 Dec 2012, at 03:00, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: > > > >> > >> Yuck. Seriously, if you depend on manual information, it's going to be > broken sooner or later. > >> > >> I'm not at all clear what the problem is, though. I can, from MIM, tell > which areas are online. And for each area, you can check which nodes are > online in that area. After that, it just becomes a question of figuring out how > the bits are connected.
[...]
>
> You'll have the same problem with Rob's DECnet router... And possibly other > equipment, or nodes that don't want to talk NICE.
I have just downloaded the spec and will think about how easy it would be to add this to the router, not that anyone other than me uses it :-(
Well, I tried pretty hard (with you) to get it working, but it really wasn't happy, was it?
I'm game for some more diagnostics if you fancy?
Stuart
