Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> writes:
I've define a service to run a DCL script that runs some python.
It works fine when one connection is made, but crashes the system =
(literally, it core dumps [or whatever the VMS word is]) on multiple =
connections.
The _system_ crashed? Have you looked at the system dump?
Here's the service definition:
TCPIP> show service himsrv/full
=20
Service: HIMSRV
State: Enabled
Port: 11337 Protocol: TCP Address: 0.0.0.0
Inactivity: 5 User_name: HIMSRV Process: HIMSRVD
Limit: 1 Active: 0 Peak: 1
=20
File: DKA0:[HIMSRV]HIMSRVTCP.COM
Flags: Listen Multi
=20
Socket Opts: Rcheck Scheck
Receive: 0 Send: 0
=20
Log Opts: None
File: not defined
=20
Security
Reject msg: not defined
Accept host: 0.0.0.0
Accept netw: 0.0.0.0
What version of TCP/IP?
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
I definitely remember seeing something, although I don't recall where...
However, Phrack Vol. 3 Issue 30 has an article titled "VAX/VMS Fake Mail" which seems to have some details.
You can find it at:
http://www.phrack.org/issues.html?issue=30&id=7
Regards, Tim.
Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Anyone have a copy of these?
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +961 788 10537
I've define a service to run a DCL script that runs some python.
It works fine when one connection is made, but crashes the system (literally, it core dumps [or whatever the VMS word is]) on multiple connections.
Here's the service definition:
TCPIP> show service himsrv/full
Service: HIMSRV
State: Enabled
Port: 11337 Protocol: TCP Address: 0.0.0.0
Inactivity: 5 User_name: HIMSRV Process: HIMSRVD
Limit: 1 Active: 0 Peak: 1
File: DKA0:[HIMSRV]HIMSRVTCP.COM
Flags: Listen Multi
Socket Opts: Rcheck Scheck
Receive: 0 Send: 0
Log Opts: None
File: not defined
Security
Reject msg: not defined
Accept host: 0.0.0.0
Accept netw: 0.0.0.0
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +961 788 10537
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Sampsa Laine wrote:
After a disaster on HILANT, I had to rebuild the cluster.
What was the disaster?
Anyone got quick howto on defining / enabling a cluster alias?
sampsa
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Experiments
Hello!
What was the disaster? I thought you knew, the monsters besieging your
location moved back to bombard Sampsa with issues. No seriously, what
happened? And was it Dave's fault?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Sampsa Laine wrote:
After a disaster on HILANT, I had to rebuild the cluster.
What was the disaster?
Anyone got quick howto on defining / enabling a cluster alias?
sampsa
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Experiments
El 27/04/2013, a les 18:34, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> va escriure:
For now, route through SG1.
Oki doki. I'll keep the circuit up anyway.
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
I rebuilt GORVAX, it was very weirdly unstable - it's using UCX now, not MULTINET.
For now, route through SG1.
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +961 788 10537
On 27 Apr 2013, at 18:49, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> wrote:
Hello,
Since some days all my traffic is being routed by SG1. My "primary" circuit should go via GORVAX, thru 46.65.175.115, but that IP address does not answer my pings. Did I miss an announced change, or is it simply temporarily down?
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
