On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:05:05PM -0000, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 14 Sep 2013, at 21:33, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
What is the difference between the 1811w and 1841 and the DEC whosis
that Tim described? My trick knee (and everything else associated with
Doctor Who, (Dave, Corey)) tells me that probably not much.
I?d assume branding and expansion modules supported.
1811w is a fixed config router with 2x 100Mbit routed interfaces, a
built in 8x 100Mbit switch and a/b/g WiFi.
the 1841 has two 100Mbit routed interfaces and two WIC slots.
I don't have number in front of me but the 1841 does better PPS than the
1811w as well.
-brian
Hi guys,
I'm having some problems configuring my new Mikrotik RouterBoard RB2011UAS-2HnD-IN which is a great multiport router with wireless. However, it runs RouterOS which is fantastic, highly configurable and mostly beyond me!
I have managed to hook up a Netgear DM111PSP ADSL modem in bridge mode so that the MikroTik box is the ADSL end point. I have configured the router to allow HTTP and SSH traffic through the router but am struggling getting the rules right for the UDP routing and firewall configuration. I wondered whether there were folks out that who could shed some light. In my naive little brain I can see how configuration using IP chains is similar to how linux can be configured to provide the same functionality.
The router is on 192.168.1.2 and the HP microserver running Johnny's bridge is 192.168.1.126
Here are the forwarding rules I have:
/ip firewall filter
add chain=forward comment="default configuration" connection-state=established
add chain=forward comment="default configuration" connection-state=related
add chain=forward comment="Allow UDP connection to hpm from internet" dst-address=192.168.1.126 dst-port=4711 in-interface=pppoe-wan protocol=\
udp
add action=log chain=forward comment="Log everything else" log-prefix="IPv4 Drop forward:"
add action=drop chain=forward comment="default configuration" connection-state=invalid
add chain=input comment="default configuration" protocol=icmp
add chain=input comment="default configuration" connection-state=established in-interface=pppoe-wan
add chain=input comment="default configuration" connection-state=related in-interface=pppoe-wan
; Forward UDP bridge requests to HPM running the bridge
add chain=input comment="bridge traffic on 4711" dst-address=192.168.1.126 dst-port=4711 in-interface=pppoe-wan protocol=udp
add action=log chain=input comment="Log everything else" disabled=yes log-prefix="IPv4 Drop input:"
add action=drop chain=input comment="default configuration" in-interface=pppoe-wan
/ip firewall nat
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat comment="default configuration" out-interface=pppoe-wan
; Forward webserver requests to SLAVE
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Forward tcp:80 to slave" dst-address=92.27.220.250 dst-port=80 protocol=tcp to-addresses=192.168.1.229 \
to-ports=80
; Connect SSH/SFTP requests through to SLAVE
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Forward ssh to slave" dst-address=92.27.220.250 dst-port=22 protocol=tcp to-addresses=192.168.1.229 \
to-ports=22
; Connect UDP requests on port 4711 to HPM running bridge
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Forward bridge udp to hpm" dst-address=92.27.220.250 dst-port=4711 protocol=udp to-addresses=\
192.168.1.126 to-ports=4711
When I turn on logging before the drop rule I get the following
IPv4 Drop input: input: in:bridge-local out:(none), src-mac b4:99:ba:bf:46:e3, proto UDP, 192.168.1.126:41301->192.168.1.2:53, len 57
Any ideas folks?
Thanks in advance,
Mark.
On 15 Sep 2013, at 19:12, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
To quote a phrase from an old friend, "Never assume.". But yes.
-----
Worse then that. They were at your linuxfest, the penguins paid them
to use the resources to create more mayhem.
That would explain the FSF selling sticker fox $1.50 then.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 14 Sep 2013, at 21:33, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
What is the difference between the 1811w and 1841 and the DEC whosis
that Tim described? My trick knee (and everything else associated with
Doctor Who, (Dave, Corey)) tells me that probably not much.
I d assume branding and expansion modules supported.
-----
Oddly enough guys the Yetis surrounding both your places left for
home, they were replaced by a crowd who spent the weekend last causing
mayhem for a fellow enthusiast in NJ.
At least it s not the flies from linuxfest.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
My 1811w and 1841 can both do DECnet. Let me look real quick, I've got
images here I'm sure.
-brian
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 08:30:33AM +0800, Tim Sneddon wrote:
Hi Mark,
I did. Well, I found an 1800 with an appropriate image on it. I'll dump
it sometime next week and get it to you.
Regards, Tim.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Mark Darvill <mark.darvill at mac.com> wrote:
On 08/09/2013 16:29, Tim Sneddon wrote:
On 8/09/2013 11:18 PM, Mark Darvill wrote:
On 08/09/2013 15:45, Robert Jarratt wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: 08 September 2013 14:52
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Config Details Required
On 2013-09-08 15:48, Mark Darvill wrote:
HI,
I will be bringing up a new decnet area on hecnet (Area 22) in the
near future.
Can I please have info on the peering for IP and any other config
details that may help. I will be using a DECbrouter 90 (Cisco) V11.1.
So, anyone know if the DECrouter will do, and who would be willing to
act
as
a peer?
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Hmmm... Didn't know much about DECbrouter until I looked it up following
these emails. If I have it right
(http://manx.classiccmp.org/**collections/mds-199909/cd2/**
network/decbroma.pdf<http://manx.classiccmp.org/collections/mds-199909/cd2/network/decbroma.pdf>)
all DECbrouters have only one Ethernet interface and a one or more
(depending on model) WAN connections using synchronous serial lines. I
am
wondering how this could be used on HECnet. I don't think anyone offers
any
synchronous serial way into HECnet, or am I wrong?
That leaves the one Ethernet interface. To be able to use that would
need
the bridge (or my user mode router, or some other hardware router) to
be on
the same LAN. But at that point there wouldn't be a lot of point having
the
DECbrouter as it would not have anything to route.
Have I missed something? Is the DECbrouter 90 (Cisco) a different beast?
Regards
Rob
I should be able to set up the DECbrouter 90 as a one armed router
behind my main internet Router which is a Cisco 1800. All I need it for is
to encapsulate DECnet and then forward it to a peer via my internet
connected router. It won't be the highest performance but it will get the
Area up, I can then change it at a later date if required.
BTW, my Cisco 1800 does not support DECnet or GRE so this is not an
option.
Does anyone have any peering info or the config used either on a Cisco
or DECbrouter.
Hi Mark,
I have a Cisco 857 which provides my connection to the 'net. I have the
following NAT rules on my Cisco 867 (gatekeeper) to pass GRE/IP packets
through to my DECbrouter 90T2:
interface Vlan1
ip address 172.17.111.254 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
interface Dialer0
ip nat outside
ip nat inside source static tcp 172.17.111.251 1723 interface Dialer0
1723
Then on my DECbrouter 90T2 (a12rtr) I just set up the tunnels, like so:
interface Tunnel52
description HECnet tunnel for ...
no ip address
decnet cost 20
tunnel source Ethernet0
tunnel destination ....
However, as Dave pointed out (and I said earlier) when Brian catches up
with the list he can add you to the mesh and you will receive all the
configuration details from him.
I am also likely able to track down a version of the Cisco 1800 IOS that
can do DECnet and GRE/IP (if you're interested).
Regards, Tim.
Hi Tim,
Did you manage to find a version of IOS for the 1800 that could support
DECnet?
Thanks, Mark
Hello!
To quote a phrase from an old friend, "Never assume.". But yes.
-----
Worse then that. They were at your linuxfest, the penguins paid them
to use the resources to create more mayhem.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 14 Sep 2013, at 21:33, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
What is the difference between the 1811w and 1841 and the DEC whosis
that Tim described? My trick knee (and everything else associated with
Doctor Who, (Dave, Corey)) tells me that probably not much.
I d assume branding and expansion modules supported.
-----
Oddly enough guys the Yetis surrounding both your places left for
home, they were replaced by a crowd who spent the weekend last causing
mayhem for a fellow enthusiast in NJ.
At least it s not the flies from linuxfest.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
My 1811w and 1841 can both do DECnet. Let me look real quick, I've got
images here I'm sure.
-brian
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 08:30:33AM +0800, Tim Sneddon wrote:
Hi Mark,
I did. Well, I found an 1800 with an appropriate image on it. I'll dump
it sometime next week and get it to you.
Regards, Tim.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Mark Darvill <mark.darvill at mac.com> wrote:
On 08/09/2013 16:29, Tim Sneddon wrote:
On 8/09/2013 11:18 PM, Mark Darvill wrote:
On 08/09/2013 15:45, Robert Jarratt wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: 08 September 2013 14:52
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Config Details Required
On 2013-09-08 15:48, Mark Darvill wrote:
HI,
I will be bringing up a new decnet area on hecnet (Area 22) in the
near future.
Can I please have info on the peering for IP and any other config
details that may help. I will be using a DECbrouter 90 (Cisco) V11.1.
So, anyone know if the DECrouter will do, and who would be willing to
act
as
a peer?
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Hmmm... Didn't know much about DECbrouter until I looked it up following
these emails. If I have it right
(http://manx.classiccmp.org/**collections/mds-199909/cd2/**
network/decbroma.pdf<http://manx.classiccmp.org/collections/mds-199909/cd2/network/decbroma.pdf>)
all DECbrouters have only one Ethernet interface and a one or more
(depending on model) WAN connections using synchronous serial lines. I
am
wondering how this could be used on HECnet. I don't think anyone offers
any
synchronous serial way into HECnet, or am I wrong?
That leaves the one Ethernet interface. To be able to use that would
need
the bridge (or my user mode router, or some other hardware router) to
be on
the same LAN. But at that point there wouldn't be a lot of point having
the
DECbrouter as it would not have anything to route.
Have I missed something? Is the DECbrouter 90 (Cisco) a different beast?
Regards
Rob
I should be able to set up the DECbrouter 90 as a one armed router
behind my main internet Router which is a Cisco 1800. All I need it for is
to encapsulate DECnet and then forward it to a peer via my internet
connected router. It won't be the highest performance but it will get the
Area up, I can then change it at a later date if required.
BTW, my Cisco 1800 does not support DECnet or GRE so this is not an
option.
Does anyone have any peering info or the config used either on a Cisco
or DECbrouter.
Hi Mark,
I have a Cisco 857 which provides my connection to the 'net. I have the
following NAT rules on my Cisco 867 (gatekeeper) to pass GRE/IP packets
through to my DECbrouter 90T2:
interface Vlan1
ip address 172.17.111.254 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
interface Dialer0
ip nat outside
ip nat inside source static tcp 172.17.111.251 1723 interface Dialer0
1723
Then on my DECbrouter 90T2 (a12rtr) I just set up the tunnels, like so:
interface Tunnel52
description HECnet tunnel for ...
no ip address
decnet cost 20
tunnel source Ethernet0
tunnel destination ....
However, as Dave pointed out (and I said earlier) when Brian catches up
with the list he can add you to the mesh and you will receive all the
configuration details from him.
I am also likely able to track down a version of the Cisco 1800 IOS that
can do DECnet and GRE/IP (if you're interested).
Regards, Tim.
Hi Tim,
Did you manage to find a version of IOS for the 1800 that could support
DECnet?
Thanks, Mark
On 14 Sep 2013, at 21:33, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
What is the difference between the 1811w and 1841 and the DEC whosis
that Tim described? My trick knee (and everything else associated with
Doctor Who, (Dave, Corey)) tells me that probably not much.
I d assume branding and expansion modules supported.
-----
Oddly enough guys the Yetis surrounding both your places left for
home, they were replaced by a crowd who spent the weekend last causing
mayhem for a fellow enthusiast in NJ.
At least it s not the flies from linuxfest.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
My 1811w and 1841 can both do DECnet. Let me look real quick, I've got
images here I'm sure.
-brian
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 08:30:33AM +0800, Tim Sneddon wrote:
Hi Mark,
I did. Well, I found an 1800 with an appropriate image on it. I'll dump
it sometime next week and get it to you.
Regards, Tim.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Mark Darvill <mark.darvill at mac.com> wrote:
On 08/09/2013 16:29, Tim Sneddon wrote:
On 8/09/2013 11:18 PM, Mark Darvill wrote:
On 08/09/2013 15:45, Robert Jarratt wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: 08 September 2013 14:52
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Config Details Required
On 2013-09-08 15:48, Mark Darvill wrote:
HI,
I will be bringing up a new decnet area on hecnet (Area 22) in the
near future.
Can I please have info on the peering for IP and any other config
details that may help. I will be using a DECbrouter 90 (Cisco) V11.1.
So, anyone know if the DECrouter will do, and who would be willing to
act
as
a peer?
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Hmmm... Didn't know much about DECbrouter until I looked it up following
these emails. If I have it right
(http://manx.classiccmp.org/**collections/mds-199909/cd2/**
network/decbroma.pdf<http://manx.classiccmp.org/collections/mds-199909/cd2/network/decbroma.pdf>)
all DECbrouters have only one Ethernet interface and a one or more
(depending on model) WAN connections using synchronous serial lines. I
am
wondering how this could be used on HECnet. I don't think anyone offers
any
synchronous serial way into HECnet, or am I wrong?
That leaves the one Ethernet interface. To be able to use that would
need
the bridge (or my user mode router, or some other hardware router) to
be on
the same LAN. But at that point there wouldn't be a lot of point having
the
DECbrouter as it would not have anything to route.
Have I missed something? Is the DECbrouter 90 (Cisco) a different beast?
Regards
Rob
I should be able to set up the DECbrouter 90 as a one armed router
behind my main internet Router which is a Cisco 1800. All I need it for is
to encapsulate DECnet and then forward it to a peer via my internet
connected router. It won't be the highest performance but it will get the
Area up, I can then change it at a later date if required.
BTW, my Cisco 1800 does not support DECnet or GRE so this is not an
option.
Does anyone have any peering info or the config used either on a Cisco
or DECbrouter.
Hi Mark,
I have a Cisco 857 which provides my connection to the 'net. I have the
following NAT rules on my Cisco 867 (gatekeeper) to pass GRE/IP packets
through to my DECbrouter 90T2:
interface Vlan1
ip address 172.17.111.254 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
interface Dialer0
ip nat outside
ip nat inside source static tcp 172.17.111.251 1723 interface Dialer0
1723
Then on my DECbrouter 90T2 (a12rtr) I just set up the tunnels, like so:
interface Tunnel52
description HECnet tunnel for ...
no ip address
decnet cost 20
tunnel source Ethernet0
tunnel destination ....
However, as Dave pointed out (and I said earlier) when Brian catches up
with the list he can add you to the mesh and you will receive all the
configuration details from him.
I am also likely able to track down a version of the Cisco 1800 IOS that
can do DECnet and GRE/IP (if you're interested).
Regards, Tim.
Hi Tim,
Did you manage to find a version of IOS for the 1800 that could support
DECnet?
Thanks, Mark
Hello!
Interesting question.
I recall reading about the original details, read the original BITNET,
and indeed studying how it worked. And several other options attached
to it, but that's as far as it went here.
----
That's odd. Sampsa there's a big rock eater right outside your flat's windows.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Was reading some stuff and apparently the main protocol were ported to VAX _and_ made to work over IP?
Anyone know what happened to this project?
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +358 40 7208932
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Brian Hechinger
Sent: 09 September 2013 18:09
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Config Details Required
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 11:22:43AM -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 09/08/2013 10:23 AM, Mark Darvill wrote:
I will be bringing up a new decnet area on hecnet (Area 22) in the
near future.
Can I please have info on the peering for IP and any other config
details that may help. I will be using a DECbrouter 90 (Cisco)
V11.1.
So, anyone know if the DECrouter will do, and who would be willing
to act as a peer?
Johnny
V11.1 supports GRE, Decnet IV Level 1 and 2 so I am hoping so. :-)
Brian can get you hooked up with his automatic meshed-tunnel config
generator, when he catches up on list mail.
Things have been very busy, but I will try to get this dealt with this
week. I'm
actually moving everything to a new colo box so this will coincide with
everyone needing to change the IP they allow SNMP to come from.
Mark, as soon as I've moved everything I'll let you know what you need to
do.
-brian
I have bought myself a DECbrouter 90T2a, which reports IOS 11.2. I have
never done anything with IOS but from other emails in this thread it looks
fairly simple if you have the necessary parameters.
Please let me know what I would need to configure. Note however, that I am
only doing this for fun and to learn something new. I will probably not use
this as my long-term connection to HECnet, although it will be a useful
backup.
Regards
Rob
Was reading some stuff and apparently the main protocol were ported to VAX _and_ made to work over IP?
Anyone know what happened to this project?
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +358 40 7208932
That raises a good question.
Which 1800 is it?
-brian
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 09:33:00PM -0400, Gregg Levine wrote:
Hello!
What is the difference between the 1811w and 1841 and the DEC whosis
that Tim described? My trick knee (and everything else associated with
Doctor Who, (Dave, Corey)) tells me that probably not much.
-----
Oddly enough guys the Yetis surrounding both your places left for
home, they were replaced by a crowd who spent the weekend last causing
mayhem for a fellow enthusiast in NJ.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
My 1811w and 1841 can both do DECnet. Let me look real quick, I've got
images here I'm sure.
-brian
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 08:30:33AM +0800, Tim Sneddon wrote:
Hi Mark,
I did. Well, I found an 1800 with an appropriate image on it. I'll dump
it sometime next week and get it to you.
Regards, Tim.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Mark Darvill <mark.darvill at mac.com> wrote:
On 08/09/2013 16:29, Tim Sneddon wrote:
On 8/09/2013 11:18 PM, Mark Darvill wrote:
On 08/09/2013 15:45, Robert Jarratt wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: 08 September 2013 14:52
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Config Details Required
On 2013-09-08 15:48, Mark Darvill wrote:
HI,
I will be bringing up a new decnet area on hecnet (Area 22) in the
near future.
Can I please have info on the peering for IP and any other config
details that may help. I will be using a DECbrouter 90 (Cisco) V11.1.
So, anyone know if the DECrouter will do, and who would be willing to
act
as
a peer?
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Hmmm... Didn't know much about DECbrouter until I looked it up following
these emails. If I have it right
(http://manx.classiccmp.org/**collections/mds-199909/cd2/**
network/decbroma.pdf<http://manx.classiccmp.org/collections/mds-199909/cd2/network/decbroma.pdf>)
all DECbrouters have only one Ethernet interface and a one or more
(depending on model) WAN connections using synchronous serial lines. I
am
wondering how this could be used on HECnet. I don't think anyone offers
any
synchronous serial way into HECnet, or am I wrong?
That leaves the one Ethernet interface. To be able to use that would
need
the bridge (or my user mode router, or some other hardware router) to
be on
the same LAN. But at that point there wouldn't be a lot of point having
the
DECbrouter as it would not have anything to route.
Have I missed something? Is the DECbrouter 90 (Cisco) a different beast?
Regards
Rob
I should be able to set up the DECbrouter 90 as a one armed router
behind my main internet Router which is a Cisco 1800. All I need it for is
to encapsulate DECnet and then forward it to a peer via my internet
connected router. It won't be the highest performance but it will get the
Area up, I can then change it at a later date if required.
BTW, my Cisco 1800 does not support DECnet or GRE so this is not an
option.
Does anyone have any peering info or the config used either on a Cisco
or DECbrouter.
Hi Mark,
I have a Cisco 857 which provides my connection to the 'net. I have the
following NAT rules on my Cisco 867 (gatekeeper) to pass GRE/IP packets
through to my DECbrouter 90T2:
interface Vlan1
ip address 172.17.111.254 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
interface Dialer0
ip nat outside
ip nat inside source static tcp 172.17.111.251 1723 interface Dialer0
1723
Then on my DECbrouter 90T2 (a12rtr) I just set up the tunnels, like so:
interface Tunnel52
description HECnet tunnel for ...
no ip address
decnet cost 20
tunnel source Ethernet0
tunnel destination ....
However, as Dave pointed out (and I said earlier) when Brian catches up
with the list he can add you to the mesh and you will receive all the
configuration details from him.
I am also likely able to track down a version of the Cisco 1800 IOS that
can do DECnet and GRE/IP (if you're interested).
Regards, Tim.
Hi Tim,
Did you manage to find a version of IOS for the 1800 that could support
DECnet?
Thanks, Mark
