Hi Gents, going to do a clean VMS install today and finally get my Vax onto HECnet. Once Im on I am going to turn off TCP/IP (wont have to worry about security attacks) and thought Id setup an archie server on there. Is there a VMS software repositary somewhere?
Kindly,
Daniel S derstr m
Sent from my iPad
It works for me and the 8-10 other links that depend on their connection
to me in the (North) Eastern US.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 12:36
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] EISNER?
Then you're very lucky. I had nothing but trouble.
There are quite a few people on HECnet using Multinet -
anybody else besides Paul have problems?
Bob
On 2014-01-16 17:00, Brian Hechinger wrote:
The problem is (at least on FreeBSD) that there is a bug with bpf and/or GRE. The 0x6002, 3 and 4 packets never get delivered.
I would suspect GRE (I have never had luck with it in the past when I tried). The bridge will run just fine on FreeBSD, or so I seem to remember atleast. And the bridge also picks those same protocols...
Johnny
-brian
On Jan 16, 2014, at 17:29, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com> wrote:
Using the ip_gre kernel module with iptunnel to configure and bring up
the GRE tunnel, it would be rudimentary to match on 0x6002, 0x6003,
and 0x6004 in the tunnel packets using a netfilter module such as
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO/netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-3.h…
It's not rocket science. :)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
A GRE tunnel won't do much good if he can't route DECnet packets over it.
Is there a reasonable Linux DECnet router? If not, you may want to try out Paul's python one.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2014, at 13:40, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
Oh ok. I'm sorry, I misunderstood.
I can set up a temporary GRE tunnel with you this afternoon if you
like, until we can get you folded into Brian's tunnel configuration
management system. Let me know.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 11:51 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Sorry if it wasn't clear... Two different threads had a little
cross-posting I think. Here I'm just trying to establish a solid
HECnet peer. Johnny-bridge would have been preferable since I'm
running this on my NAS (and I know 'bridge' works), but if a GRE peer
is easier to find, by all means. While my QNAP NAS does have several
tunneling options in its stock config (it's linux arm), it appears
they did not include the ip_gre module, so I'll have to see about
hacking that in. Assuming that goes well, who's solidly offering the
GRE tunnel? We can exchange IP's and configs off-list.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
I thought you and I were only discussing some X.25 experimentation.
If you want a full-on HECnet connection via GRE, Brian Hechinger can
stick your info in his database, and tunnel configurations will be
automatically generated for all of us on his next run.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 02:12 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Seems rather counter to the idea of HECnet if it's this difficult to
join it.
On Jan 14, 2014 10:13 PM, "Johnny Billquist" <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
There are definitely people running the bridge in the US, but if
they want to peer is another story.
Johnny
On 2014-01-14 21:31, Mark Abene wrote:
I'm going to try getting a GRE tunnel going with Dave McGuire
soonish... In the meantime, if someone has a speedy connection
and is
already running 'bridge' (which would be simplest) let me know.
Thanks,
Mark
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:25 PM, <Paul_Koning at dell.com
<mailto:Paul_Koning at dell.com>> wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com
<mailto:phiber at phiber.com>> wrote:
I'm not using the virtual cisco for HECnet at all,
that's only for the
X.25 project (currently at sampsa.com
<http://sampsa.com>, though I may run a local node
additionally).
For HECnet I'm just running a plain old fashioned
Johnny-bridge. :)
I take it HECnet peers are lacking in the U.S.?
I guess I should put my Python router up permanently...
paul
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
The problem is (at least on FreeBSD) that there is a bug with bpf and/or GRE. The 0x6002, 3 and 4 packets never get delivered.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2014, at 17:29, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com> wrote:
Using the ip_gre kernel module with iptunnel to configure and bring up
the GRE tunnel, it would be rudimentary to match on 0x6002, 0x6003,
and 0x6004 in the tunnel packets using a netfilter module such as
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO/netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-3.h…
It's not rocket science. :)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
A GRE tunnel won't do much good if he can't route DECnet packets over it.
Is there a reasonable Linux DECnet router? If not, you may want to try out Paul's python one.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2014, at 13:40, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
Oh ok. I'm sorry, I misunderstood.
I can set up a temporary GRE tunnel with you this afternoon if you
like, until we can get you folded into Brian's tunnel configuration
management system. Let me know.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 11:51 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Sorry if it wasn't clear... Two different threads had a little
cross-posting I think. Here I'm just trying to establish a solid
HECnet peer. Johnny-bridge would have been preferable since I'm
running this on my NAS (and I know 'bridge' works), but if a GRE peer
is easier to find, by all means. While my QNAP NAS does have several
tunneling options in its stock config (it's linux arm), it appears
they did not include the ip_gre module, so I'll have to see about
hacking that in. Assuming that goes well, who's solidly offering the
GRE tunnel? We can exchange IP's and configs off-list.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
I thought you and I were only discussing some X.25 experimentation.
If you want a full-on HECnet connection via GRE, Brian Hechinger can
stick your info in his database, and tunnel configurations will be
automatically generated for all of us on his next run.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 02:12 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Seems rather counter to the idea of HECnet if it's this difficult to
join it.
On Jan 14, 2014 10:13 PM, "Johnny Billquist" <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
There are definitely people running the bridge in the US, but if
they want to peer is another story.
Johnny
On 2014-01-14 21:31, Mark Abene wrote:
I'm going to try getting a GRE tunnel going with Dave McGuire
soonish... In the meantime, if someone has a speedy connection
and is
already running 'bridge' (which would be simplest) let me know.
Thanks,
Mark
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:25 PM, <Paul_Koning at dell.com
<mailto:Paul_Koning at dell.com>> wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com
<mailto:phiber at phiber.com>> wrote:
I'm not using the virtual cisco for HECnet at all,
that's only for the
X.25 project (currently at sampsa.com
<http://sampsa.com>, though I may run a local node
additionally).
For HECnet I'm just running a plain old fashioned
Johnny-bridge. :)
I take it HECnet peers are lacking in the U.S.?
I guess I should put my Python router up permanently...
paul
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 01/16/2014 06:18 PM, Mark Abene wrote:
Brian manages who's GRE tunnels go where? Sounds good. For testing,
I'll contact you off-list.
Brian developed a database-backed tool that generates Cisco config
snippets to maintain a fully-meshed tunnel. It runs well. It basically
regenerates all tunnel interfaces starting with number 50 every time it
runs. Any lower-numbered tunnels are left untouched.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Brian manages who's GRE tunnels go where? Sounds good. For testing,
I'll contact you off-list.
Thanks,
Mark
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
Oh ok. I'm sorry, I misunderstood.
I can set up a temporary GRE tunnel with you this afternoon if you
like, until we can get you folded into Brian's tunnel configuration
management system. Let me know.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 11:51 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Sorry if it wasn't clear... Two different threads had a little
cross-posting I think. Here I'm just trying to establish a solid
HECnet peer. Johnny-bridge would have been preferable since I'm
running this on my NAS (and I know 'bridge' works), but if a GRE peer
is easier to find, by all means. While my QNAP NAS does have several
tunneling options in its stock config (it's linux arm), it appears
they did not include the ip_gre module, so I'll have to see about
hacking that in. Assuming that goes well, who's solidly offering the
GRE tunnel? We can exchange IP's and configs off-list.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
I thought you and I were only discussing some X.25 experimentation.
If you want a full-on HECnet connection via GRE, Brian Hechinger can
stick your info in his database, and tunnel configurations will be
automatically generated for all of us on his next run.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 02:12 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Seems rather counter to the idea of HECnet if it's this difficult to
join it.
On Jan 14, 2014 10:13 PM, "Johnny Billquist" <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
There are definitely people running the bridge in the US, but if
they want to peer is another story.
Johnny
On 2014-01-14 21:31, Mark Abene wrote:
I'm going to try getting a GRE tunnel going with Dave McGuire
soonish... In the meantime, if someone has a speedy connection
and is
already running 'bridge' (which would be simplest) let me know.
Thanks,
Mark
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:25 PM, <Paul_Koning at dell.com
<mailto:Paul_Koning at dell.com>> wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com
<mailto:phiber at phiber.com>> wrote:
I'm not using the virtual cisco for HECnet at all,
that's only for the
X.25 project (currently at sampsa.com
<http://sampsa.com>, though I may run a local node
additionally).
For HECnet I'm just running a plain old fashioned
Johnny-bridge. :)
I take it HECnet peers are lacking in the U.S.?
I guess I should put my Python router up permanently...
paul
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Ah ok. So this isn't a GRE solution, it would require someone either
running the original 'bridge', or this same program at the remote end?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jarratt RMA
<robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
I have not written anything specifically to make it a GRE endpoint (if that
is the right term). It can work as a direct replacement for the bridge in
that it can talk the same protocols. In other words on a LAN it implements
the DECnet Ethernet interface, and it also accepts the UDP packet format
processed by the bridge. The difference being of course that it does not
bridge the networks, instead it routes between your local Ethernet(s) and
the "Ethernet" that comes in over the UDP interface.
I hope that explains it.
Regards
Rob
On 16 January 2014 21:16, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Does that work with GRE on Linux? I never got GRE with not IP to work on
FreeBSD due to strangeness with bpf.
Paul's python router talks GRE natively. Not sure how well tested that is
though as I never got it setup before the colo box getting shut off.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2014, at 15:35, Jarratt RMA <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com>
wrote:
I wrote a user mode one that runs on Linux, although my primary
development platform is Windows and I have not checked Linux compatibility
lately. You can find it on http://route20.codeplex.com/
Regards
Rob
On 16 January 2014 18:53, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
A GRE tunnel won't do much good if he can't route DECnet packets over it.
Is there a reasonable Linux DECnet router? If not, you may want to try
out Paul's python one.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2014, at 13:40, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
Oh ok. I'm sorry, I misunderstood.
I can set up a temporary GRE tunnel with you this afternoon if you
like, until we can get you folded into Brian's tunnel configuration
management system. Let me know.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 11:51 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Sorry if it wasn't clear... Two different threads had a little
cross-posting I think. Here I'm just trying to establish a solid
HECnet peer. Johnny-bridge would have been preferable since I'm
running this on my NAS (and I know 'bridge' works), but if a GRE peer
is easier to find, by all means. While my QNAP NAS does have several
tunneling options in its stock config (it's linux arm), it appears
they did not include the ip_gre module, so I'll have to see about
hacking that in. Assuming that goes well, who's solidly offering the
GRE tunnel? We can exchange IP's and configs off-list.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Dave McGuire
<mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
I thought you and I were only discussing some X.25 experimentation.
If you want a full-on HECnet connection via GRE, Brian Hechinger can
stick your info in his database, and tunnel configurations will be
automatically generated for all of us on his next run.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 02:12 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Seems rather counter to the idea of HECnet if it's this difficult to
join it.
On Jan 14, 2014 10:13 PM, "Johnny Billquist" <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
There are definitely people running the bridge in the US, but if
they want to peer is another story.
Johnny
On 2014-01-14 21:31, Mark Abene wrote:
I'm going to try getting a GRE tunnel going with Dave McGuire
soonish... In the meantime, if someone has a speedy
connection
and is
already running 'bridge' (which would be simplest) let me
know.
Thanks,
Mark
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:25 PM, <Paul_Koning at dell.com
<mailto:Paul_Koning at dell.com>> wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Mark Abene
<phiber at phiber.com
<mailto:phiber at phiber.com>> wrote:
I'm not using the virtual cisco for HECnet at all,
that's only for the
X.25 project (currently at sampsa.com
<http://sampsa.com>, though I may run a local node
additionally).
For HECnet I'm just running a plain old fashioned
Johnny-bridge. :)
I take it HECnet peers are lacking in the U.S.?
I guess I should put my Python router up permanently...
paul
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Johnny's 'bridge' uses bpf, and it works just fine on linux, so I'm
not concerned.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Does that work with GRE on Linux? I never got GRE with not IP to work on
FreeBSD due to strangeness with bpf.
Paul's python router talks GRE natively. Not sure how well tested that is
though as I never got it setup before the colo box getting shut off.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2014, at 15:35, Jarratt RMA <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
I wrote a user mode one that runs on Linux, although my primary development
platform is Windows and I have not checked Linux compatibility lately. You
can find it on http://route20.codeplex.com/
Regards
Rob
On 16 January 2014 18:53, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
A GRE tunnel won't do much good if he can't route DECnet packets over it.
Is there a reasonable Linux DECnet router? If not, you may want to try out
Paul's python one.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2014, at 13:40, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
Oh ok. I'm sorry, I misunderstood.
I can set up a temporary GRE tunnel with you this afternoon if you
like, until we can get you folded into Brian's tunnel configuration
management system. Let me know.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 11:51 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Sorry if it wasn't clear... Two different threads had a little
cross-posting I think. Here I'm just trying to establish a solid
HECnet peer. Johnny-bridge would have been preferable since I'm
running this on my NAS (and I know 'bridge' works), but if a GRE peer
is easier to find, by all means. While my QNAP NAS does have several
tunneling options in its stock config (it's linux arm), it appears
they did not include the ip_gre module, so I'll have to see about
hacking that in. Assuming that goes well, who's solidly offering the
GRE tunnel? We can exchange IP's and configs off-list.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
wrote:
I thought you and I were only discussing some X.25 experimentation.
If you want a full-on HECnet connection via GRE, Brian Hechinger can
stick your info in his database, and tunnel configurations will be
automatically generated for all of us on his next run.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 02:12 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Seems rather counter to the idea of HECnet if it's this difficult to
join it.
On Jan 14, 2014 10:13 PM, "Johnny Billquist" <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
There are definitely people running the bridge in the US, but if
they want to peer is another story.
Johnny
On 2014-01-14 21:31, Mark Abene wrote:
I'm going to try getting a GRE tunnel going with Dave McGuire
soonish... In the meantime, if someone has a speedy
connection
and is
already running 'bridge' (which would be simplest) let me
know.
Thanks,
Mark
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:25 PM, <Paul_Koning at dell.com
<mailto:Paul_Koning at dell.com>> wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com
<mailto:phiber at phiber.com>> wrote:
I'm not using the virtual cisco for HECnet at all,
that's only for the
X.25 project (currently at sampsa.com
<http://sampsa.com>, though I may run a local node
additionally).
For HECnet I'm just running a plain old fashioned
Johnny-bridge. :)
I take it HECnet peers are lacking in the U.S.?
I guess I should put my Python router up permanently...
paul
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
I take a look at this now and let you know.
-M
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Jarratt RMA
<robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com> wrote:
I wrote a user mode one that runs on Linux, although my primary development
platform is Windows and I have not checked Linux compatibility lately. You
can find it on http://route20.codeplex.com/
Regards
Rob
On 16 January 2014 18:53, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
A GRE tunnel won't do much good if he can't route DECnet packets over it.
Is there a reasonable Linux DECnet router? If not, you may want to try out
Paul's python one.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2014, at 13:40, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
Oh ok. I'm sorry, I misunderstood.
I can set up a temporary GRE tunnel with you this afternoon if you
like, until we can get you folded into Brian's tunnel configuration
management system. Let me know.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 11:51 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Sorry if it wasn't clear... Two different threads had a little
cross-posting I think. Here I'm just trying to establish a solid
HECnet peer. Johnny-bridge would have been preferable since I'm
running this on my NAS (and I know 'bridge' works), but if a GRE peer
is easier to find, by all means. While my QNAP NAS does have several
tunneling options in its stock config (it's linux arm), it appears
they did not include the ip_gre module, so I'll have to see about
hacking that in. Assuming that goes well, who's solidly offering the
GRE tunnel? We can exchange IP's and configs off-list.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
wrote:
I thought you and I were only discussing some X.25 experimentation.
If you want a full-on HECnet connection via GRE, Brian Hechinger can
stick your info in his database, and tunnel configurations will be
automatically generated for all of us on his next run.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 02:12 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Seems rather counter to the idea of HECnet if it's this difficult to
join it.
On Jan 14, 2014 10:13 PM, "Johnny Billquist" <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
There are definitely people running the bridge in the US, but if
they want to peer is another story.
Johnny
On 2014-01-14 21:31, Mark Abene wrote:
I'm going to try getting a GRE tunnel going with Dave McGuire
soonish... In the meantime, if someone has a speedy
connection
and is
already running 'bridge' (which would be simplest) let me
know.
Thanks,
Mark
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:25 PM, <Paul_Koning at dell.com
<mailto:Paul_Koning at dell.com>> wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com
<mailto:phiber at phiber.com>> wrote:
I'm not using the virtual cisco for HECnet at all,
that's only for the
X.25 project (currently at sampsa.com
<http://sampsa.com>, though I may run a local node
additionally).
For HECnet I'm just running a plain old fashioned
Johnny-bridge. :)
I take it HECnet peers are lacking in the U.S.?
I guess I should put my Python router up permanently...
paul
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Using the ip_gre kernel module with iptunnel to configure and bring up
the GRE tunnel, it would be rudimentary to match on 0x6002, 0x6003,
and 0x6004 in the tunnel packets using a netfilter module such as
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO/netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-3.h…
It's not rocket science. :)
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
A GRE tunnel won't do much good if he can't route DECnet packets over it.
Is there a reasonable Linux DECnet router? If not, you may want to try out Paul's python one.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2014, at 13:40, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
Oh ok. I'm sorry, I misunderstood.
I can set up a temporary GRE tunnel with you this afternoon if you
like, until we can get you folded into Brian's tunnel configuration
management system. Let me know.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 11:51 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Sorry if it wasn't clear... Two different threads had a little
cross-posting I think. Here I'm just trying to establish a solid
HECnet peer. Johnny-bridge would have been preferable since I'm
running this on my NAS (and I know 'bridge' works), but if a GRE peer
is easier to find, by all means. While my QNAP NAS does have several
tunneling options in its stock config (it's linux arm), it appears
they did not include the ip_gre module, so I'll have to see about
hacking that in. Assuming that goes well, who's solidly offering the
GRE tunnel? We can exchange IP's and configs off-list.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
I thought you and I were only discussing some X.25 experimentation.
If you want a full-on HECnet connection via GRE, Brian Hechinger can
stick your info in his database, and tunnel configurations will be
automatically generated for all of us on his next run.
-Dave
On 01/16/2014 02:12 AM, Mark Abene wrote:
Seems rather counter to the idea of HECnet if it's this difficult to
join it.
On Jan 14, 2014 10:13 PM, "Johnny Billquist" <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
There are definitely people running the bridge in the US, but if
they want to peer is another story.
Johnny
On 2014-01-14 21:31, Mark Abene wrote:
I'm going to try getting a GRE tunnel going with Dave McGuire
soonish... In the meantime, if someone has a speedy connection
and is
already running 'bridge' (which would be simplest) let me know.
Thanks,
Mark
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:25 PM, <Paul_Koning at dell.com
<mailto:Paul_Koning at dell.com>> wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:17 PM, Mark Abene <phiber at phiber.com
<mailto:phiber at phiber.com>> wrote:
I'm not using the virtual cisco for HECnet at all,
that's only for the
X.25 project (currently at sampsa.com
<http://sampsa.com>, though I may run a local node
additionally).
For HECnet I'm just running a plain old fashioned
Johnny-bridge. :)
I take it HECnet peers are lacking in the U.S.?
I guess I should put my Python router up permanently...
paul
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
