On 05/01/2014 08:13 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-02 02:10, Jovan Trujillo wrote:
Alrighty so no dynamic memory management. Then should we limit memory
allocation to 1 MB per node? What's everybody got to offer?
1MB per node? With PDP11s? Are you crazy???
Ahem. You'll note that I found a much more, erm, "diplomatic" way to
say that. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 05/01/2014 08:10 PM, Jovan Trujillo wrote:
Alrighty so no dynamic memory management. Then should we limit memory
allocation to 1 MB per node? What's everybody got to offer?
That might be tough on the smaller (18-bit addressing) PDP-11s.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 2014-05-02 02:10, Jovan Trujillo wrote:
Alrighty so no dynamic memory management. Then should we limit memory
allocation to 1 MB per node? What's everybody got to offer?
1MB per node? With PDP11s? Are you crazy???
Johnny
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
On 2014-05-02 02:00, Jovan Trujillo wrote:
Yeah put all those machines to work! PDP-11 for sure. So what's the
common denominator for software development here? Do we all have C
compilers? I was thinking of starting with something simple, like
finding solutions to Beal's Conjecture for crazy large numbers.
More common, and generating better code: FORTRAN 77.
Johnny
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net
<mailto:b4 at gewt.net>
<mailto:b4 at gewt.net <mailto:b4 at gewt.net>>> wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 05/01/2014 12:10 AM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Speaking of PDP-11s, has your intermediary gotten
the haul
from VCF your
way yet?
Yes! I haven't looked at them yet, but they're here,
safe and
sound.
I'll work out a way to get them to you soon.
Cool!
Back to work now.
Back to waiting on crap in my case. ;)
-Dave
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se <mailto:bqt at softjar.se> ||
Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Alrighty so no dynamic memory management. Then should we limit memory allocation to 1 MB per node? What's everybody got to offer?
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2014-05-02 02:00, Jovan Trujillo wrote:
Yeah put all those machines to work! PDP-11 for sure. So what's the
common denominator for software development here? Do we all have C
compilers? I was thinking of starting with something simple, like
finding solutions to Beal's Conjecture for crazy large numbers.
More common, and generating better code: FORTRAN 77.
Johnny
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net
<mailto:b4 at gewt.net>> wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 05/01/2014 12:10 AM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Speaking of PDP-11s, has your intermediary gotten the haul
from VCF your
way yet?
Yes! I haven't looked at them yet, but they're here, safe and
sound.
I'll work out a way to get them to you soon.
Cool!
Back to work now.
Back to waiting on crap in my case. ;)
-Dave
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2014-05-02 02:00, Jovan Trujillo wrote:
Yeah put all those machines to work! PDP-11 for sure. So what's the
common denominator for software development here? Do we all have C
compilers? I was thinking of starting with something simple, like
finding solutions to Beal's Conjecture for crazy large numbers.
More common, and generating better code: FORTRAN 77.
Johnny
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net
<mailto:b4 at gewt.net>> wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 05/01/2014 12:10 AM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Speaking of PDP-11s, has your intermediary gotten the haul
from VCF your
way yet?
Yes! I haven't looked at them yet, but they're here, safe and
sound.
I'll work out a way to get them to you soon.
Cool!
Back to work now.
Back to waiting on crap in my case. ;)
-Dave
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Yeah put all those machines to work! PDP-11 for sure. So what's the common denominator for software development here? Do we all have C compilers? I was thinking of starting with something simple, like finding solutions to Beal's Conjecture for crazy large numbers.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 05/01/2014 12:10 AM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Speaking of PDP-11s, has your intermediary gotten the haul from VCF your
way yet?
Yes! I haven't looked at them yet, but they're here, safe and sound.
I'll work out a way to get them to you soon.
Cool!
Back to work now.
Back to waiting on crap in my case. ;)
-Dave
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-02 01:42, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-02 01:37, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Hello,
Is TOPS-20's DECnet stack Phase III or IV? I'm trying to throw it in to
the rest of the stuff using a VMS VM.
TOPS-20 V4.1? That would be phase III only. If it even exists...
It exists for sure!
$INFORMATION (ABOUT) VERSION
GSORG TOPS-20 V4.1 KS10, TOPS-20 Monitor 4.1(5471)
TOPS-20 Command processor 5.1(1354)
Program is OPR, version is 4(414)
$INFORMATION (ABOUT) DECNET
Local DECNET node: TOPS20
Accessible DECNET nodes are: TOPS20
Ok. Cool. I seem to remember various issues and stuff with DECnet on a KS and TOPS-20, but I don't recall details.
Thanks. I thought it was Phase III but wasn't sure. Can Phase IV work
with Phase III? There's some rule pertaining to that I forgot...
Yes, it can. The limitations are that phase III nodes can only talk with machines in the same area, and only machines with node numbers less than 256 (obviously).
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-02 01:37, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Hello,
Is TOPS-20's DECnet stack Phase III or IV? I'm trying to throw it in to
the rest of the stuff using a VMS VM.
TOPS-20 V4.1? That would be phase III only. If it even exists...
It exists for sure!
$INFORMATION (ABOUT) VERSION
GSORG TOPS-20 V4.1 KS10, TOPS-20 Monitor 4.1(5471)
TOPS-20 Command processor 5.1(1354)
Program is OPR, version is 4(414)
$INFORMATION (ABOUT) DECNET
Local DECNET node: TOPS20
Accessible DECNET nodes are: TOPS20
Thanks. I thought it was Phase III but wasn't sure. Can Phase IV work with Phase III? There's some rule pertaining to that I forgot...
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-02 01:37, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Hello,
Is TOPS-20's DECnet stack Phase III or IV? I'm trying to throw it in to
the rest of the stuff using a VMS VM.
TOPS-20 V4.1? That would be phase III only. If it even exists...
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Hello,
Is TOPS-20's DECnet stack Phase III or IV? I'm trying to throw it in to the rest of the stuff using a VMS VM.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
