On 2014-05-02 13:56, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
El 02/05/2014, a les 10.59, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> va escriure:
Johnny,
You needed an ULTRIX box to test against, right?
9.5 should work for that. Once I figure out how to configure the guest account!
BITXOU (7.82) is also up and running, access info is guest/guest. It is running in a Raspberry Pi, sharing the little thingy with a KLH10 instance, a PDP11 and another VAX, so don't expect a whooping speed :)
Yay! Works. But damn, that was slow. :-)
Also, seems like FAL on Ultrix-32 have some bugs. :-)
Thanks. One more system checked against RSX with my new fix in place.
Johnny
El 02/05/2014, a les 10.59, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> va escriure:
Johnny,
You needed an ULTRIX box to test against, right?
9.5 should work for that. Once I figure out how to configure the guest account!
BITXOU (7.82) is also up and running, access info is guest/guest. It is running in a Raspberry Pi, sharing the little thingy with a KLH10 instance, a PDP11 and another VAX, so don't expect a whooping speed :)
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172
tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt
running.................................................................................................................................
failed
Well, different error this time. :)
-brian
It might be timeout related. It's a bit slow. cisco 2524 (68030) processor (revision J) with 14336K/2048K bytes of memory.
I've got SNMP debug on so try another push.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
Let me know when you're ready for a push.
Done. Try now.
-brian
On May 2, 2014, at 7:37, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
UDP
That'd be why. ;)
-brian
On May 2, 2014, at 4:22, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
Still doesn't like you. :)
Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172 tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt
Error reloading router: dev.gimme-sympathy.org :: No SNMP response received before timeout
Is SNMP using UDP or TCP?
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from 199.166.5.172 to any port snmp rdr-to 10.10.0.10 port snmp
access-list 2 permit 199.166.5.172
All seems like it should be working...perhaps SNMP is supposed to be UDP?
-brian
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Let me know when you're ready for a push.
-brian
On May 2, 2014, at 7:37, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
UDP
That'd be why. ;)
-brian
On May 2, 2014, at 4:22, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
Still doesn't like you. :)
Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172 tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt
Error reloading router: dev.gimme-sympathy.org :: No SNMP response received before timeout
Is SNMP using UDP or TCP?
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from 199.166.5.172 to any port snmp rdr-to 10.10.0.10 port snmp
access-list 2 permit 199.166.5.172
All seems like it should be working...perhaps SNMP is supposed to be UDP?
-brian
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
UDP
That'd be why. ;)
-brian
On May 2, 2014, at 4:22, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
Still doesn't like you. :)
Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172 tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt
Error reloading router: dev.gimme-sympathy.org :: No SNMP response received before timeout
Is SNMP using UDP or TCP?
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from 199.166.5.172 to any port snmp rdr-to 10.10.0.10 port snmp
access-list 2 permit 199.166.5.172
All seems like it should be working...perhaps SNMP is supposed to be UDP?
-brian
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172
tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt
running.................................................................................................................................
failed
Well, different error this time. :)
-brian
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 07:40:16AM -0400, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
Let me know when you're ready for a push.
Done. Try now.
-brian
On May 2, 2014, at 7:37, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
UDP
That'd be why. ;)
-brian
On May 2, 2014, at 4:22, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
Still doesn't like you. :)
Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172 tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt
Error reloading router: dev.gimme-sympathy.org :: No SNMP response received before timeout
Is SNMP using UDP or TCP?
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from 199.166.5.172 to any port snmp rdr-to 10.10.0.10 port snmp
access-list 2 permit 199.166.5.172
All seems like it should be working...perhaps SNMP is supposed to be UDP?
-brian
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
UDP
-brian
On May 2, 2014, at 4:22, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
Still doesn't like you. :)
Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172 tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt
Error reloading router: dev.gimme-sympathy.org :: No SNMP response received before timeout
Is SNMP using UDP or TCP?
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from 199.166.5.172 to any port snmp rdr-to 10.10.0.10 port snmp
access-list 2 permit 199.166.5.172
All seems like it should be working...perhaps SNMP is supposed to be UDP?
-brian
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Johnny,
You needed an ULTRIX box to test against, right?
9.5 should work for that. Once I figure out how to configure the guest account!
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 05/02/2014 02:05 AM, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
There are very few PDP-11s that won't kick the living snot out of a
Commodore 64, FYI.
I've yet to see a PDP-11 with builtin color graphics
_and_ sound.
Me neither.
The 64 probably outsold all models of 11 taken together.
That's certainly possible, but one cannot argue that their target
markets were even remotely related. Or even aware of each other's
existence, for tha tmatter.
"Our physics lab was just given a Commodore 64! We can have one user at a time and we have no computing power."
"The art department has just received a PDP-11/70!"
</badjoke>
so it depends on your application and measurement I
suppose.
We were talking about distributed math apps.
Distributed math apps that should GIVE AUDIBLE OUTPUT.
I'm told there were, probably third party, sound cards
for qbus. Has anyone of you seen one or know more?
I haven't. I have a really neat Qbus card with a TMS9918 sprite-based
video chip on it, though!
That's interesting!
-Dave
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects