Hello!
It's strange. I think I've seen a PRO someplace, but I can't recall
where. I do recall seeing a PDP-11 working in special circumstances.
(Would anyone curious please ask off list.)
Would a board built to be a MIDI controller suffice? One of the
composers who specializes in TV music basically constructed a whole
system for a TV show about thirty years ago. Eventually he switched to
a Mac.......
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2014-05-20 17:39, Jean-Yves Bernier wrote:
At 8:05 AM +0200 2/5/14, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
I've yet to see a PDP-11 with builtin color graphics _and_ sound.
This one has both:
http://www2.pescadoo.net/pdp/syter/grm2082.jpg
The machine is a SMS 1000 OEM 11/73.
Here is the mixer screen:
http://www2.pescadoo.net/pdp/syter/INSTR2.GRA.png
and the edit screen:
http://www2.pescadoo.net/pdp/syter/INSTR5.GRA.png
512x512x8 frame buffer manufactured by Arinfo, France.
Serial BitPad.
Custom 4AD/8DA through DRV11.
Discontinued.
Of course... :-(
Anyway, I just realized/remembered that I'm not sure if the PRO was ever
mentioned in the context of PDP-11 with graphics and sound.
The PRO obviously always have grahpics. But there was also a sound option to
it, which could interface with telephone systems. Not sure exactly how
capable it was, but I have some blurb in a handbook somewhere.
Johnny
On 2014-05-20 17:39, Jean-Yves Bernier wrote:
At 8:05 AM +0200 2/5/14, Pontus Pihlgren wrote:
I've yet to see a PDP-11 with builtin color graphics _and_ sound.
This one has both:
http://www2.pescadoo.net/pdp/syter/grm2082.jpg
The machine is a SMS 1000 OEM 11/73.
Here is the mixer screen:
http://www2.pescadoo.net/pdp/syter/INSTR2.GRA.png
and the edit screen:
http://www2.pescadoo.net/pdp/syter/INSTR5.GRA.png
512x512x8 frame buffer manufactured by Arinfo, France.
Serial BitPad.
Custom 4AD/8DA through DRV11.
Discontinued.
Of course... :-(
Anyway, I just realized/remembered that I'm not sure if the PRO was ever mentioned in the context of PDP-11 with graphics and sound.
The PRO obviously always have grahpics. But there was also a sound option to it, which could interface with telephone systems. Not sure exactly how capable it was, but I have some blurb in a handbook somewhere.
Johnny
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
It's a dual-height board. I don't think it /can/ be an 11/23+!
Doh! So you actually have a KDF11-AA (M8186). That sucks. I'm not sure if those were ever upgraded to 22-bit addressing, or if you need the KDF11-BA (M8189) for that.
Not sure. Not going to complaing considering the price. ;)
Oh well, so you might actually be stuck with 11M then.
Yeah. :(
My 11/23+ board is dead++ but I have a replacement (eventually) on the way.
Hey, at least I can run mapped unlike my 11/03s. ;) I have a lot of those boards...
I'm tired and I've been fiddling with many different things. ;)
:-)
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-20 17:11, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
My memory board is third-party. Looks like it's truncating my memory
then. ;)
Are you sure. Very few 11/23 systems actually exist. Most people
really have 11/23+ systems, even if they are not aware of it.
It's a dual-height board. I don't think it /can/ be an 11/23+!
Doh! So you actually have a KDF11-AA (M8186). That sucks. I'm not sure if those were ever upgraded to 22-bit addressing, or if you need the KDF11-BA (M8189) for that.
Oh well, so you might actually be stuck with 11M then.
(That said, without split I/D-space, you'll have preciously little
pool space, but that might not be a big issue for you right here.)
Probably not. I'll only have one disk in use at a time really.
Pool space is used for many things, but with just one user, and few
things running, not much pool is needed.
Ahh. I must be thinking of...buffer space?
Not sure what you are thinking of. :-)
I'm tired and I've been fiddling with many different things. ;)
:-)
Johnny
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote:
The disk is 1048778 blocks. I created a 512M image and copied it bit-for-bit to the disk. I think i'll just go SYSGEN 4.8 and wait for my cleaning tapes to get RSTS/E working.
How about copying the image back off, to see if the disk controller mangled it?
I'll do that once RSX is up so I don't have to dismantle the system again. ;)
The message you quoted says that the content of block 1 is invalid (the pack label). Judging by the code, what it found is 0143161 rather than a valid PCS.
Interesting. I wonder how its getting mangled. The disk size IS changing between copy and creation, though. (Because both are different...apparently unavoidable due to 1000 versus 1024k.)
I wonder if your partitioning disk controller is misbehaving.
Possible...but RT-11 and RSX-11 are fine with it. They're a bit less picky though. VMS didn't seem too picky, either.
BTW, sufficiently recent versions of RSTS (including the one you have, given that message) should handle a 2 GB disk directly (at DCS=64). That way you don t need to mess with partitions.
I didn't have a tape drive at the time...so I would've needed to copy a 2G image at 10Mbit to a disk that wouldn't show up as 2G. (That drive then failed)
I'll just wait for the cleaning tape.
paul
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On May 20, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
After a reboot:
Pack cluster size is not 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 or 64.
PC=120324 PS=030344 OV=000006 M5=004000 M6=004200 SP=041236
R0=000026 R1=143161 R2=143161 R3=000000 R4=000002 R5=041350
The disk is 1048778 blocks. I created a 512M image and copied it bit-for-bit to the disk. I think i'll just go SYSGEN 4.8 and wait for my cleaning tapes to get RSTS/E working.
How about copying the image back off, to see if the disk controller mangled it?
The message you quoted says that the content of block 1 is invalid (the pack label). Judging by the code, what it found is 0143161 rather than a valid PCS.
I wonder if your partitioning disk controller is misbehaving.
BTW, sufficiently recent versions of RSTS (including the one you have, given that message) should handle a 2 GB disk directly (at DCS=64). That way you don t need to mess with partitions.
paul
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
My memory board is third-party. Looks like it's truncating my memory
then. ;)
Are you sure. Very few 11/23 systems actually exist. Most people really have 11/23+ systems, even if they are not aware of it.
It's a dual-height board. I don't think it /can/ be an 11/23+!
(That said, without split I/D-space, you'll have preciously little
pool space, but that might not be a big issue for you right here.)
Probably not. I'll only have one disk in use at a time really.
Pool space is used for many things, but with just one user, and few
things running, not much pool is needed.
Ahh. I must be thinking of...buffer space?
Not sure what you are thinking of. :-)
I'm tired and I've been fiddling with many different things. ;)
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-20 17:06, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
4.6M+'s SYSGEN and it wouldn't accept 11/23 as an answer.
The difference between the 11/23 and 11/23+ is the amount of memory.
The original 11/23 could not go above 256K... If you have more, then
you actually have an 11/23+.
My memory board is third-party. Looks like it's truncating my memory
then. ;)
Are you sure. Very few 11/23 systems actually exist. Most people really have 11/23+ systems, even if they are not aware of it.
(That said, without split I/D-space, you'll have preciously little
pool space, but that might not be a big issue for you right here.)
Probably not. I'll only have one disk in use at a time really.
Pool space is used for many things, but with just one user, and few
things running, not much pool is needed.
Ahh. I must be thinking of...buffer space?
Not sure what you are thinking of. :-)
Johnny
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
4.6M+'s SYSGEN and it wouldn't accept 11/23 as an answer.
The difference between the 11/23 and 11/23+ is the amount of memory. The original 11/23 could not go above 256K... If you have more, then you actually have an 11/23+.
My memory board is third-party. Looks like it's truncating my memory then. ;)
(That said, without split I/D-space, you'll have preciously little
pool space, but that might not be a big issue for you right here.)
Probably not. I'll only have one disk in use at a time really.
Pool space is used for many things, but with just one user, and few things running, not much pool is needed.
Ahh. I must be thinking of...buffer space?
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects