defunct, no longer active, tunnels (are any of these people still around??)
DUSTY:: (Marc ??)
I'm still around, but I had lost my connection to you (I think due to firewall issues on my end), and far worse, I couldn't recall to whom it was supposed to be connected. I sent out mail to the HECnet list back then, and Steve Davidson was kind enough to reconnect me back online.
So, since I'm currently connected through Steve's system, you can delete the entry you have for me at this point.
Thanks for keeping me active on your end!
--Marc
Area 19 revised:
1 - Area 19 (SG1 19.41 Level-II (AREA) router)
2 - bridge and 10 tunnels
3 - gwx.declab.net (69.21.253.230)
4 - bridge (psilo.update.uu.se:4711)
tunnel circuit tcp-0-0 - DUSTY:: 71.182.147.6
tcp-0-2 - LEGATO:: 64.142.52.93
tcp-0-3 - RVDSXL:: 193.2.191.212
tcp-0-4 - BUBBLE:: 62.49.25.56 *
tcp-0-6 - ROOSTA:: 80.6.148.150 **
tcp-0-8 - GROVAX:: 188.220.63.6
tcp-0-20 - WOPR:: 74.143.35.91
tcp-0-33 - FRUGAL:: 72.240.216.74 **
tcp-0-52 - RIFTER:: 216.15.64.181
tcp-0-59 - STUPI:: 192.108.200.211
Tunnel circuits are in the form of: tcp-0-<remote_area>
Area "0" is an extention of my "DEC LAN"
* This will change to SLAVE:: after I install Multinet there
** This is a dynamic-DNS address that is subject to change
-Steve
1 - Area 2, LEGATO:: (2.1)
2 - bridge and 5 active tunnels
3 - decnet.jfcl.com (64.142.52.93)
4 - bridge (psilo.update.uu.se:4711)
tcp-0-6 - ROOSTA:: 80.6.148.150
tcp-0-8 - GORVAX:: 188.220.63.6
tcp-0-19 - SG1:: 69.21.253.230
tcp-0-54 - CEIRE:: decnet.beyondthepale.ie
tcp-0-59 - STUPI:: 192.108.200.211
defunct, no longer active, tunnels (are any of these people still around??)
PDXVAX:: (Zane Healy)
PETEY:: (Dan Williams)
DUSTY:: (Marc ??)
SELENE:: (Thierry Dussuet)
MISER:: (Fred Coffey) (Ok, Fred is still active but we decided we
didn't need this tunnel)
Bob
All list members send me the following information:
1 - area # none yet... seeking to join any area associated with Hawai'i
2 - connection type future install of bridge program
3 - IP address 72.235.236.114
4 - connect to... unknown
5 - would like to claim hostname FAERY
--
Aloha, IW(TM): Celestial Angela; SL(TM): Celeste Python; Angela Kahealani
"(I'll) Be Seeing You..." All information and transactions are private between
the parties, and are non negotiable. All rights reserve without prejudice by
Angela Kahealani http://www.kahealani.com/kahealani/angela_kahealani.html
1 - Area 19
2 - bridge and 10 tunnels
3 - gwx.declab.net (69.21.253.230)
4 - bridge (psilo.update.uu.se)
tunnel circuit tcp-0-0 - DUSTY:: 71.182.147.6
tcp-0-2 - LEGATO:: 64.142.52.93
tcp-0-3 - RVDSXL:: 193.2.191.212
tcp-0-4 - BUBBLE:: 62.49.25.56 This
will change to SLAVE:: after I install Multinet there
tcp-0-6 - ROOSTA:: 80.6.148.150 This is
a dynamic-DNS address that is subject to change
tcp-0-8 - GROVAX:: 188.220.63.6
tcp-0-20 - WOPR:: 74.143.35.91
tcp-0-33 - FRUGAL:: 72.240.216.74 This is a
dynamic-DNS address that is subject to change
tcp-0-52 - RIFTER:: 216.15.64.181
tcp-0-59 - STUPI:: 192.108.200.211
Tunnel circuits are in the form of: tcp-0-<remote_area>
Area "0" is an extention of my "DEC LAN"
-Steve
I knew I was forgetting something...
They brew a nice beer at Westmalle abbey, it is known to affect the brain :-)
From: Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:04:14 -0800
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
ReplyTo: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs
1 - 42
2 - Bridge
3 - 174.4.164.12
4 - psilo
Do you also need to know the DECnet address of the area router? In my case, it's 42.1 (CANADA::)
Ian
On 2011-12-27, at 3:01 PM, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Ok I'll bite
All list members send me the following information:
1 - area #
2 - connection type (bridge program, Multinet tunnel, phase 5 over DeC IP stack, what have you)
3 - your IP address as used on Dec 27th
4 - IP address you connect to.
Example:
1 - 44
2 - bridge program
3 - my own (don't recal)
4 - psilo.
Ok?
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Steve Davidson
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
Verzonden: 27 december 2011 23:41
RE: Peter's Mom's house.. ...but the hop count from your side would be
painful! :-)
I will have some time to look at this on Thursday unless someone else
would like to do it for me... PLEASE...???
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 3:33 PM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
I believe that we need a map to figure this out correctly.
Absolutely - all we need now is a volunteer :-)
Don't I remember that someone once plotted a bunch of the locations on
a
Google map? That's probably not the best depiction, but it'd be a place
to
start, especially if we could overlay lines for the connections.
The only other comment that I'd make is to remember that bandwidth
isn't
necessarily related to geography. Just because two sites are physically
close doesn't mean that's the most efficient connection.
Heck, Peter's Mom's house in Sweden has more bandwidth then all of us
combined - we should just make her the hub :-)
Bob
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=B04D6D3430DE11E19…
1 - 42
2 - Bridge
3 - 174.4.164.12
4 - psilo
Do you also need to know the DECnet address of the area router? In my case, it's 42.1 (CANADA::)
Ian
On 2011-12-27, at 3:01 PM, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Ok I'll bite
All list members send me the following information:
1 - area #
2 - connection type (bridge program, Multinet tunnel, phase 5 over DeC IP stack, what have you)
3 - your IP address as used on Dec 27th
4 - IP address you connect to.
Example:
1 - 44
2 - bridge program
3 - my own (don't recal)
4 - psilo.
Ok?
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Steve Davidson
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
Verzonden: 27 december 2011 23:41
RE: Peter's Mom's house.. ...but the hop count from your side would be
painful! :-)
I will have some time to look at this on Thursday unless someone else
would like to do it for me... PLEASE...???
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 3:33 PM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
I believe that we need a map to figure this out correctly.
Absolutely - all we need now is a volunteer :-)
Don't I remember that someone once plotted a bunch of the locations on
a
Google map? That's probably not the best depiction, but it'd be a place
to
start, especially if we could overlay lines for the connections.
The only other comment that I'd make is to remember that bandwidth
isn't
necessarily related to geography. Just because two sites are physically
close doesn't mean that's the most efficient connection.
Heck, Peter's Mom's house in Sweden has more bandwidth then all of us
combined - we should just make her the hub :-)
Bob
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=B04D6D3430DE11E19…
Ok I'll bite
All list members send me the following information:
1 - area #
2 - connection type (bridge program, Multinet tunnel, phase 5 over DeC IP stack, what have you)
3 - your IP address as used on Dec 27th
4 - IP address you connect to.
Example:
1 - 44
2 - bridge program
3 - my own (don't recal)
4 - psilo.
Ok?
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Steve Davidson
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
Verzonden: 27 december 2011 23:41
RE: Peter's Mom's house.. ...but the hop count from your side would be
painful! :-)
I will have some time to look at this on Thursday unless someone else
would like to do it for me... PLEASE...???
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 3:33 PM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
I believe that we need a map to figure this out correctly.
Absolutely - all we need now is a volunteer :-)
Don't I remember that someone once plotted a bunch of the locations on
a
Google map? That's probably not the best depiction, but it'd be a place
to
start, especially if we could overlay lines for the connections.
The only other comment that I'd make is to remember that bandwidth
isn't
necessarily related to geography. Just because two sites are physically
close doesn't mean that's the most efficient connection.
Heck, Peter's Mom's house in Sweden has more bandwidth then all of us
combined - we should just make her the hub :-)
Bob
RE: Peter's Mom's house.. ...but the hop count from your side would be
painful! :-)
I will have some time to look at this on Thursday unless someone else
would like to do it for me... PLEASE...???
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 3:33 PM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
I believe that we need a map to figure this out correctly.
Absolutely - all we need now is a volunteer :-)
Don't I remember that someone once plotted a bunch of the locations on
a
Google map? That's probably not the best depiction, but it'd be a place
to
start, especially if we could overlay lines for the connections.
The only other comment that I'd make is to remember that bandwidth
isn't
necessarily related to geography. Just because two sites are physically
close doesn't mean that's the most efficient connection.
Heck, Peter's Mom's house in Sweden has more bandwidth then all of us
combined - we should just make her the hub :-)
Bob
I believe that we need a map to figure this out correctly.
Absolutely - all we need now is a volunteer :-)
Don't I remember that someone once plotted a bunch of the locations on a
Google map? That's probably not the best depiction, but it'd be a place to
start, especially if we could overlay lines for the connections.
The only other comment that I'd make is to remember that bandwidth isn't
necessarily related to geography. Just because two sites are physically
close doesn't mean that's the most efficient connection.
Heck, Peter's Mom's house in Sweden has more bandwidth then all of us
combined - we should just make her the hub :-)
Bob
