I do not create any accounts unless asked by the node owner...
Only some machines have guest accounts and as far as I know we have no
standard. This site does not have guest accounts. I do create accounts
on request for some of the machines. Mostly PLUTO::, because it is the
only RSTS/E system on HECnet, but it is not up all of the time. With
the exception of PLUTO:: none of my machines offer anything that HECnet
users don't already have.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Brian Hechinger
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:09 PM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs - Area 19 revised
Ah, no guest accounts have been setup unless Steve did it so I'm
assuming he hasn't. I'll create some guest accounts tomorrow.
What's the standard HECnet guest?
-brian
On Dec 28, 2011, at 19:43, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Hi Brian, It may have been an example of the NML issue discussed here
a couple of days ago. Anyway set host rifter worked fine. I tried
guest/guest and hecnet/guiest but that didn't work. Well, I quit for the
day, it's late out here.
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Brian Hechinger
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs - Area 19 revised
Verzonden: 29 december 2011 01:07
On 12/28/2011 6:44 PM, H Vlems wrote:
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't
work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
No, it's a Phase IV node.
-brian
Ah, no guest accounts have been setup unless Steve did it so I'm assuming he hasn't. I'll create some guest accounts tomorrow.
What's the standard HECnet guest?
-brian
On Dec 28, 2011, at 19:43, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Hi Brian, It may have been an example of the NML issue discussed here a couple of days ago. Anyway set host rifter worked fine. I tried guest/guest and hecnet/guiest but that didn't work. Well, I quit for the day, it's late out here.
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Brian Hechinger
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs - Area 19 revised
Verzonden: 29 december 2011 01:07
On 12/28/2011 6:44 PM, H Vlems wrote:
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
No, it's a Phase IV node.
-brian
Hi Brian, It may have been an example of the NML issue discussed here a couple of days ago. Anyway set host rifter worked fine. I tried guest/guest and hecnet/guiest but that didn't work. Well, I quit for the day, it's late out here.
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Brian Hechinger
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs - Area 19 revised
Verzonden: 29 december 2011 01:07
On 12/28/2011 6:44 PM, H Vlems wrote:
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
No, it's a Phase IV node.
-brian
On 12/28/2011 6:44 PM, H Vlems wrote:
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
No, it's a Phase IV node.
-brian
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens
Brian Hechinger
Verzonden: woensdag, december 2011 20:56
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs - Area 19 revised
1 - Area 52 (RIFTER 52.2 Level-II (AREA) router) (and currently only
machine here so far)
2 - 2 tunnels
3 - bart.4amlunch.net (216.15.64.181)
4 - tunnel circuits
tcp-0-19 - SG1:: 69.21.253.230
tcp-0-33 - FRUGAL:: 72.240.216.74
On 12/28/2011 12:38 PM, Steve Davidson wrote:
I agree! It certainly makes sense to use LEGATO as the other US hub.
It is on the other side of the country and has similar characteristics -
namely Multinet and bridge connections, plus static IP address(es).
I would also like to offer up RIFTER if needed. The caveat there is that until I get new batteries for my one UPS the host that RIFTER runs on can be unstable due to power blips. Not that they happen often.
I hope to get SUN up and running sometime soon as well as that has better overall internet connectivity as well as UPS/generator backup as it's in a proper datacenter.
If it matters, connectivity is as follows:
Home - 60mbit down, 6mbit up, static IP
Colo - 100mbit down, 100mbit up, static IP
-brian
I agree! It certainly makes sense to use LEGATO as the other US hub.
It is on the other side of the country and has similar characteristics -
namely Multinet and bridge connections, plus static IP address(es).
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:56 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case.
You can use LEGATO - half the machines connected to SG1 are also
connected to that (or conversely, there's only about 3 or 4 machines
that aren't connected to LEGATO).
BTW, area 59 is also connected to LEGATO - that got left out of the
map somehow.
What's with area 4? It doesn't have any connection...
Bob
P.S. Nice map - thanks! Hmmm... Somebody could write a DCL script to
crawl the network and output the connection data in CSV format, and then
the map could be updated "automatically".
The problem with area 4 is that it is missing Multinet since the change
from BUBBLE:: to SLAVE::. It is on my todo list to fix.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:56 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case.
You can use LEGATO - half the machines connected to SG1 are also
connected to that (or conversely, there's only about 3 or 4 machines
that aren't connected to LEGATO).
BTW, area 59 is also connected to LEGATO - that got left out of the
map somehow.
What's with area 4? It doesn't have any connection...
Bob
P.S. Nice map - thanks! Hmmm... Somebody could write a DCL script to
crawl the network and output the connection data in CSV format, and then
the map could be updated "automatically".
looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case.
You can use LEGATO - half the machines connected to SG1 are also connected
to that (or conversely, there's only about 3 or 4 machines that aren't
connected to LEGATO).
BTW, area 59 is also connected to LEGATO - that got left out of the map
somehow.
What's with area 4? It doesn't have any connection...
Bob
P.S. Nice map - thanks! Hmmm... Somebody could write a DCL script to
crawl the network and output the connection data in CSV format, and then the
map could be updated "automatically".
