1. Area 20
2. Multinet tunnel to SG1::
Bridge to Johnny, though it is down at the moment to test Steve's tunnel
3. 74.143.35.91 (static)
4. Multinet TCP-0-19 -- 69.21.253.230
bridge - psilo.update.uu.se:4711
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:21 AM, H Vlems <hvlems at zonnet.nl> wrote:
Thanks,Rok. Here's the updated map
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens Rok
Vidmar
Verzonden: woensdag, december 2011 13:11
Aan: hecnet at update.uu.se
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs
> All list members send me the following information:
> 1 - area #
> 2 - connection type (bridge program, Multinet tunnel, phase 5 over DeC IP
stack, what have you)
> 3 - your IP address as used on Dec 27th
> 4 - IP address you connect to.
1 - 3
2 - Multinet tunnel
3 - 193.2.191.211 (NUK1C), 193.2.191.212 (RVDSXL)
4 - 188.220.63.6 (GORVAX), 69.21.253.230 (SG1)
--
Regards, Rok
I do not create any accounts unless asked by the node owner...
Only some machines have guest accounts and as far as I know we have no
standard. This site does not have guest accounts. I do create accounts
on request for some of the machines. Mostly PLUTO::, because it is the
only RSTS/E system on HECnet, but it is not up all of the time. With
the exception of PLUTO:: none of my machines offer anything that HECnet
users don't already have.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Brian Hechinger
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:09 PM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs - Area 19 revised
Ah, no guest accounts have been setup unless Steve did it so I'm
assuming he hasn't. I'll create some guest accounts tomorrow.
What's the standard HECnet guest?
-brian
On Dec 28, 2011, at 19:43, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Hi Brian, It may have been an example of the NML issue discussed here
a couple of days ago. Anyway set host rifter worked fine. I tried
guest/guest and hecnet/guiest but that didn't work. Well, I quit for the
day, it's late out here.
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Brian Hechinger
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs - Area 19 revised
Verzonden: 29 december 2011 01:07
On 12/28/2011 6:44 PM, H Vlems wrote:
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't
work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
No, it's a Phase IV node.
-brian
Ah, no guest accounts have been setup unless Steve did it so I'm assuming he hasn't. I'll create some guest accounts tomorrow.
What's the standard HECnet guest?
-brian
On Dec 28, 2011, at 19:43, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Hi Brian, It may have been an example of the NML issue discussed here a couple of days ago. Anyway set host rifter worked fine. I tried guest/guest and hecnet/guiest but that didn't work. Well, I quit for the day, it's late out here.
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Brian Hechinger
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs - Area 19 revised
Verzonden: 29 december 2011 01:07
On 12/28/2011 6:44 PM, H Vlems wrote:
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
No, it's a Phase IV node.
-brian
Hi Brian, It may have been an example of the NML issue discussed here a couple of days ago. Anyway set host rifter worked fine. I tried guest/guest and hecnet/guiest but that didn't work. Well, I quit for the day, it's late out here.
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Brian Hechinger
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs - Area 19 revised
Verzonden: 29 december 2011 01:07
On 12/28/2011 6:44 PM, H Vlems wrote:
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
No, it's a Phase IV node.
-brian
On 12/28/2011 6:44 PM, H Vlems wrote:
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
No, it's a Phase IV node.
-brian
Brian, is RIFTER a phase V node? NCP set exec node RIFTER doesn't work, even
when I jump to SG1 first.
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens
Brian Hechinger
Verzonden: woensdag, december 2011 20:56
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs - Area 19 revised
1 - Area 52 (RIFTER 52.2 Level-II (AREA) router) (and currently only
machine here so far)
2 - 2 tunnels
3 - bart.4amlunch.net (216.15.64.181)
4 - tunnel circuits
tcp-0-19 - SG1:: 69.21.253.230
tcp-0-33 - FRUGAL:: 72.240.216.74
On 12/28/2011 12:38 PM, Steve Davidson wrote:
I agree! It certainly makes sense to use LEGATO as the other US hub.
It is on the other side of the country and has similar characteristics -
namely Multinet and bridge connections, plus static IP address(es).
I would also like to offer up RIFTER if needed. The caveat there is that until I get new batteries for my one UPS the host that RIFTER runs on can be unstable due to power blips. Not that they happen often.
I hope to get SUN up and running sometime soon as well as that has better overall internet connectivity as well as UPS/generator backup as it's in a proper datacenter.
If it matters, connectivity is as follows:
Home - 60mbit down, 6mbit up, static IP
Colo - 100mbit down, 100mbit up, static IP
-brian
I agree! It certainly makes sense to use LEGATO as the other US hub.
It is on the other side of the country and has similar characteristics -
namely Multinet and bridge connections, plus static IP address(es).
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:56 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case.
You can use LEGATO - half the machines connected to SG1 are also
connected to that (or conversely, there's only about 3 or 4 machines
that aren't connected to LEGATO).
BTW, area 59 is also connected to LEGATO - that got left out of the
map somehow.
What's with area 4? It doesn't have any connection...
Bob
P.S. Nice map - thanks! Hmmm... Somebody could write a DCL script to
crawl the network and output the connection data in CSV format, and then
the map could be updated "automatically".
The problem with area 4 is that it is missing Multinet since the change
from BUBBLE:: to SLAVE::. It is on my todo list to fix.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:56 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case.
You can use LEGATO - half the machines connected to SG1 are also
connected to that (or conversely, there's only about 3 or 4 machines
that aren't connected to LEGATO).
BTW, area 59 is also connected to LEGATO - that got left out of the
map somehow.
What's with area 4? It doesn't have any connection...
Bob
P.S. Nice map - thanks! Hmmm... Somebody could write a DCL script to
crawl the network and output the connection data in CSV format, and then
the map could be updated "automatically".
