-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Kari Uusim ki
Sent: 28 June 2012 22:01
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] "Poor mans routing" and the Italian Hobbyist DECNET
On 28.6.2012 23:28, Rok Vidmar wrote:
I don't think that will work.
How about a bridge translating HECnet's area 1 to an
area unused in Italian net and translating Italian area 1
to an unused area in HECnet?
--
Regards, Rok
.
That's exactly what an ATG (Address Translation Gateway) does. Although I
haven't used it over TCP/IP (Internet in this case). Maybe it would work
if it
is configured in either end of a GRE tunnel. Could be worth testing.
Kari
I have started a bit of work to create a user mode DECnet router and I am
sure that this functionality could be added at some point. I will certainly
consider it as I progress. But progress is not going to be quick.
Regards
Rob
I'll have a try... i'm sure to have a 5.25 drive around here somewhere.
Anyway back to the Ultrix/DECnet marlarkey. I found an image of a decnet tape, but i ran into the old PAK problem. So its installed, but won't work. Any idea on a way round this? Or should I just be content that TCP/IP works on it, and move on to something else... Linux DECnet on a Pi is high on my hitlist at the moment.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Can you DD the disks? I'd love a play :)
Sampsa
On 29 Jun 2012, at 00:16, Tony Blews wrote:
The boxes say SCO Interactive. For the x386 platform. Its raining its arse off at the moment, and I don't want to get wet going to the shed.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Jason Stevens <neozeed at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Tony Blews <tonyblews at gmail.com> wrote:
Ultrix not liking the year 2000 means you need to be preposterous, sadly.
Slightly related: while poking around in the shed looking for a spare kettle lead, I found a shrink-wrapped copy of SCO Unix on 5.25" disks and a copy of the "Unix for VMS Users" book. I've moved house 7 times in the last 20 years. Why do i keep this crap?
What version of SCO Unix...?
you should ebay it, it'll probably fetch 100+ usd.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Tony Blews <tonyblews at gmail.com> wrote:
The boxes say SCO Interactive. For the x386 platform. Its raining its arse off at the moment, and I don't want to get wet going to the shed.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Jason Stevens <neozeed at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Tony Blews <tonyblews at gmail.com> wrote:
Ultrix not liking the year 2000 means you need to be preposterous, sadly.
Slightly related: while poking around in the shed looking for a spare kettle lead, I found a shrink-wrapped copy of SCO Unix on 5.25" disks and a copy of the "Unix for VMS Users" book. I've moved house 7 times in the last 20 years. Why do i keep this crap?
What version of SCO Unix...?
The boxes say SCO Interactive. For the x386 platform. Its raining its arse off at the moment, and I don't want to get wet going to the shed.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Jason Stevens <neozeed at gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Tony Blews <tonyblews at gmail.com> wrote:
Ultrix not liking the year 2000 means you need to be preposterous, sadly.
Slightly related: while poking around in the shed looking for a spare kettle lead, I found a shrink-wrapped copy of SCO Unix on 5.25" disks and a copy of the "Unix for VMS Users" book. I've moved house 7 times in the last 20 years. Why do i keep this crap?
What version of SCO Unix...?
On 28.6.2012 13:09, Mark Benson wrote:
That's a UNIX tradition I think, lot of UNIXs I have used (IRIX,
Solaris, NetBSD to name a few) return the 'preposterous value in Time
if Day clock' or similar error if the date wrong. I think it's
triggered if the system date is prior to the kernel's date :)
DigitalUnix (OSF/1 or Tru64unix; pick your favourite name) does it as well.
Kari
On 28.6.2012 23:28, Rok Vidmar wrote:
I don't think that will work.
How about a bridge translating HECnet's area 1 to an
area unused in Italian net and translating Italian area 1
to an unused area in HECnet?
--
Regards, Rok
.
That's exactly what an ATG (Address Translation Gateway) does. Although I haven't used it over TCP/IP (Internet in this case). Maybe it would work if it is configured in either end of a GRE tunnel. Could be worth testing.
Kari
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Tony Blews <tonyblews at gmail.com> wrote:
Ultrix not liking the year 2000 means you need to be preposterous, sadly.
Slightly related: while poking around in the shed looking for a spare kettle lead, I found a shrink-wrapped copy of SCO Unix on 5.25" disks and a copy of the "Unix for VMS Users" book. I've moved house 7 times in the last 20 years. Why do i keep this crap?
What version of SCO Unix...?
I don't think that will work.
How about a bridge translating HECnet's area 1 to an
area unused in Italian net and translating Italian area 1
to an unused area in HECnet?
--
Regards, Rok
?REDO FROM START always annoyed me on the PET. It just made no sense given the context.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Marc Chametzky <marc at bluevine.net> wrote:
When I was much younger (back in high school), I used a PDP-11/03 running RSTS and MU-BASIC (v1). It used three character error codes.
So, while in BASIC, we typed in:
WHAT DID YOU DO LAST SUNDAY?
and it responded:
?SYN
That was terribly amusing to us teenagers.
--Marc
When I was much younger (back in high school), I used a PDP-11/03 running RSTS and MU-BASIC (v1). It used three character error codes.
So, while in BASIC, we typed in:
WHAT DID YOU DO LAST SUNDAY?
and it responded:
?SYN
That was terribly amusing to us teenagers.
--Marc
