HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

15589 discussions

"Poor mans routing" and the Italian Hobbyist DECNET

by jeep＠scshome.net

PMR works great with hidden areas! If the Italian network went to a hidden network, then we could designate a router to deal with the connection between the two of them. In our current scheme they would have to go to either area 63 (currently used for this kind of thing - on a site-by-site basis) or free up area 62 and define max area to be something less then whichever area number we chose. -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Sampsa Laine Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 09:57 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: [HECnet] "Poor mans routing" and the Italian Hobbyist DECNET Guys, Do you think it would be possible to have a host that would somehow bridge HECnet with the Italian DECNET and then use the "poor mans routing" (i.e. HOST1::HOST2::<object) to pass e.g. mail across our two networks? I have no idea how this works in practice, but just throwing the idea out there. From what I understood is that the Italians use many of the same nets / nodes as us (mainly network 1) which would make a network merger impractical. Sampsa

13 years, 7 months

"Poor mans routing" and the Italian Hobbyist DECNET

by sampsa＠mac.com

On 29 Jun 2012, at 02:37, Steve Davidson wrote: PMR works great with hidden areas! If the Italian network went to a hidden network, then we could designate a router to deal with the connection between the two of them. In our current scheme they would have to go to either area 63 (currently used for this kind of thing - on a site-by-site basis) or free up area 62 and define max area to be something less then whichever area number we chose. -Steve So now we just need to get them to buy into this nutty scheme, right? Sampsa

13 years, 7 months

"Poor mans routing" and the Italian Hobbyist DECNET

by robert.jarratt＠ntlworld.com

-----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Kari Uusim ki Sent: 28 June 2012 22:01 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] "Poor mans routing" and the Italian Hobbyist DECNET On 28.6.2012 23:28, Rok Vidmar wrote: I don't think that will work. How about a bridge translating HECnet's area 1 to an area unused in Italian net and translating Italian area 1 to an unused area in HECnet? -- Regards, Rok . That's exactly what an ATG (Address Translation Gateway) does. Although I haven't used it over TCP/IP (Internet in this case). Maybe it would work if it is configured in either end of a GRE tunnel. Could be worth testing. Kari I have started a bit of work to create a user mode DECnet router and I am sure that this functionality could be added at some point. I will certainly consider it as I progress. But progress is not going to be quick. Regards Rob

13 years, 7 months

SimH, Ultrix and DECnet

by tonyblews＠gmail.com

I'll have a try... i'm sure to have a 5.25 drive around here somewhere. Anyway back to the Ultrix/DECnet marlarkey. I found an image of a decnet tape, but i ran into the old PAK problem. So its installed, but won't work. Any idea on a way round this? Or should I just be content that TCP/IP works on it, and move on to something else... Linux DECnet on a Pi is high on my hitlist at the moment. On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote: Can you DD the disks? I'd love a play :) Sampsa On 29 Jun 2012, at 00:16, Tony Blews wrote: The boxes say SCO Interactive. For the x386 platform. Its raining its arse off at the moment, and I don't want to get wet going to the shed. On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Jason Stevens <neozeed at gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Tony Blews <tonyblews at gmail.com> wrote: Ultrix not liking the year 2000 means you need to be preposterous, sadly. Slightly related: while poking around in the shed looking for a spare kettle lead, I found a shrink-wrapped copy of SCO Unix on 5.25" disks and a copy of the "Unix for VMS Users" book. I've moved house 7 times in the last 20 years. Why do i keep this crap? What version of SCO Unix...?

13 years, 7 months

SimH, Ultrix and DECnet

by neozeed＠gmail.com

you should ebay it, it'll probably fetch 100+ usd. On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Tony Blews <tonyblews at gmail.com> wrote: The boxes say SCO Interactive. For the x386 platform. Its raining its arse off at the moment, and I don't want to get wet going to the shed. On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Jason Stevens <neozeed at gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Tony Blews <tonyblews at gmail.com> wrote: Ultrix not liking the year 2000 means you need to be preposterous, sadly. Slightly related: while poking around in the shed looking for a spare kettle lead, I found a shrink-wrapped copy of SCO Unix on 5.25" disks and a copy of the "Unix for VMS Users" book. I've moved house 7 times in the last 20 years. Why do i keep this crap? What version of SCO Unix...?

13 years, 7 months

SimH, Ultrix and DECnet

by tonyblews＠gmail.com

The boxes say SCO Interactive. For the x386 platform. Its raining its arse off at the moment, and I don't want to get wet going to the shed. On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Jason Stevens <neozeed at gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Tony Blews <tonyblews at gmail.com> wrote: Ultrix not liking the year 2000 means you need to be preposterous, sadly. Slightly related: while poking around in the shed looking for a spare kettle lead, I found a shrink-wrapped copy of SCO Unix on 5.25" disks and a copy of the "Unix for VMS Users" book. I've moved house 7 times in the last 20 years. Why do i keep this crap? What version of SCO Unix...?

13 years, 7 months

SimH, Ultrix and DECnet

by uusimaki＠exdecfinland.org

On 28.6.2012 13:09, Mark Benson wrote: That's a UNIX tradition I think, lot of UNIXs I have used (IRIX, Solaris, NetBSD to name a few) return the 'preposterous value in Time if Day clock' or similar error if the date wrong. I think it's triggered if the system date is prior to the kernel's date :) DigitalUnix (OSF/1 or Tru64unix; pick your favourite name) does it as well. Kari

13 years, 7 months

"Poor mans routing" and the Italian Hobbyist DECNET

by uusimaki＠exdecfinland.org

On 28.6.2012 23:28, Rok Vidmar wrote: I don't think that will work. How about a bridge translating HECnet's area 1 to an area unused in Italian net and translating Italian area 1 to an unused area in HECnet? -- Regards, Rok . That's exactly what an ATG (Address Translation Gateway) does. Although I haven't used it over TCP/IP (Internet in this case). Maybe it would work if it is configured in either end of a GRE tunnel. Could be worth testing. Kari

13 years, 7 months

SimH, Ultrix and DECnet

by neozeed＠gmail.com

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Tony Blews <tonyblews at gmail.com> wrote: Ultrix not liking the year 2000 means you need to be preposterous, sadly. Slightly related: while poking around in the shed looking for a spare kettle lead, I found a shrink-wrapped copy of SCO Unix on 5.25" disks and a copy of the "Unix for VMS Users" book. I've moved house 7 times in the last 20 years. Why do i keep this crap? What version of SCO Unix...?

13 years, 7 months

"Poor mans routing" and the Italian Hobbyist DECNET

by rok.vidmar＠gmail.com

I don't think that will work. How about a bridge translating HECnet's area 1 to an area unused in Italian net and translating Italian area 1 to an unused area in HECnet? -- Regards, Rok

13 years, 7 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet