Think of this as a notification system and text message extension to VMS PHONE :)
PHONE HELP MAIL ?
That doesn't give you an overview of everybody logged on anywhere, an IM system does.
This is more of a system to see who's online rather than to necessarily communicate with them, PHONE etc are much better, which is why I should where the "buddy" is logged in.
Sampsa
This is way off-topic so I will be brief.
Does anyone here know if it's possible to connect an IBM bisync device
(like the host interface on a 3174-61R) to a serial interface on a Cisco
router, and talk it into bridging to Ethernet in whatever protocol(s)
the Ethernet-attached 3174s speak?
Thanks,
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Half a year or maybe a year ago. Sampsa was running a program which used PHONE to check who was logged in on various machines. When he tried all machines in area 1, MIM got loads of entries in the log for Sampsa's machine trying to talk with machines that were down.
(I might be remembering things wrong, and I might be mixing things up, but it was not as if MIM crashed or anything because of Sampsa's code, but I asked him to stop, as he was filling up plenty of logs as far as I can remember.)
Yeah, I didn't mean crashed MIM or anything, but caused problems - basically the phone directory just went through the nodelist and did a PHONE DIR to them..If a node was down, the call would fail.
It wasn't a good idea from BQT's side :)
On 2013-01-17, at 10:20 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
I'd do it with an HDLC/SDLC-capable chip like a Z8530...offload as
much from the firmware as possible, leave those cycles for protocol
handling. Unless you meant wrapping bare ?DLC frames in packets?
I was thinking that we don't even need to decapsulate the serial frame at all - just detect the start and end. All we're doing is emulating a piece of wire, after all. Unless we're putting in a fancy LCD status display, but I think that's overkill.
Wrapping the data in UDP is simple. The HDLC layer could deal with
error detection/correction.
Yes!
The problem is finding surplus time to embark on this. Maybe a few
of us could collaborate on it?
I have that problem as well, but I got really excited when you
mentioned it, because I am doing a lot of designs with Ethernet now. I
have a "base" design, a "hardware macro" if you will, that I've recycled
several times. It's a Philips..erm, NXP LPC2300-series ARM7 with an
on-chip Ethernet MAC, and all supporting hardware. I typically run
FreeRTOS and uIP on them.
The only things I have dev platforms are on my end are PIC and Atmel. I have some Zilog stuff, but I gave up on them several years ago. However, if you're able to put together the hardware layer, and there's a C compiler available for your platform, I can help on the software side. I've also done some software work for a local company that uses a TI Davinci processor.
Interfacing an ?DLC engine to that would be a cakewalk starting from
that base design as a head-start. I have a few tubes of Z8530s in
PLCC-44 packages here.
Oh oh. I think there's another project starting... :)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=410C8376613711E2A…
On 01/18/2013 01:14 AM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
I'm not working on anything now - I just came up with the idea.
I meant "do you design stuff with microcontrollers".
I did some Googling, and there seems to be commercial units, all around
$1K per end (async is much cheaper).
Good heavens!
Microcontrollers and digital electronics is another one of my
hobbies.
Excellent! Same here, though I also do it professionally.
Async serial is simple for a microcontroller to handle.
I've never actually looked to see if there's any synchronous
libraries out there.
I'd do it with an HDLC/SDLC-capable chip like a Z8530...offload as
much from the firmware as possible, leave those cycles for protocol
handling. Unless you meant wrapping bare ?DLC frames in packets?
Wrapping the data in UDP is simple. The HDLC layer could deal with
error detection/correction.
Yes!
The problem is finding surplus time to embark on this. Maybe a few
of us could collaborate on it?
I have that problem as well, but I got really excited when you
mentioned it, because I am doing a lot of designs with Ethernet now. I
have a "base" design, a "hardware macro" if you will, that I've recycled
several times. It's a Philips..erm, NXP LPC2300-series ARM7 with an
on-chip Ethernet MAC, and all supporting hardware. I typically run
FreeRTOS and uIP on them.
Interfacing an ?DLC engine to that would be a cakewalk starting from
that base design as a head-start. I have a few tubes of Z8530s in
PLCC-44 packages here.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
I'm not working on anything now - I just came up with the idea. I did some Googling, and there seems to be commercial units, all around $1K per end (async is much cheaper).
Microcontrollers and digital electronics is another one of my hobbies. Async serial is simple for a microcontroller to handle. I've never actually looked to see if there's any synchronous libraries out there.
Wrapping the data in UDP is simple. The HDLC layer could deal with error detection/correction.
The problem is finding surplus time to embark on this. Maybe a few of us could collaborate on it?
Ian
On 2013-01-17, at 10:07 PM, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/18/2013 12:41 AM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
I wonder if there'd be any interest in cobbling up a little
microcontroller circuit that could convert synchronous serial to
Ethernet. We could use these to emulate leased lines on equipment
that doesn't even have Ethernet boards.
YES. Are you working with that sort of stuff? I ask because I am and
could probably do it.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Hello!
That is a truly amazing idea. What sort of adapters are the both of
you thinking of?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=58228A76613511E2A…
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/18/2013 12:41 AM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
I wonder if there'd be any interest in cobbling up a little
microcontroller circuit that could convert synchronous serial to
Ethernet. We could use these to emulate leased lines on equipment
that doesn't even have Ethernet boards.
YES. Are you working with that sort of stuff? I ask because I am and
could probably do it.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Hello!
That is a truly amazing idea. What sort of adapters are the both of
you thinking of?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On 18 Jan 2013, at 00:55, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/18/2013 12:33 AM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
I wonder how many telcos will still give you a plain leased line over
POTS...
Most all of them, if not ALL of them.
Leased lines, however, aren't POTS. POTS refers to single analog
phone lines, which leased lines (56K DDS, T1, T3, etc) are not.
Thanks for the clarification, I often confuse some telecom stuff. ;)
Just a nit.
;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 01/18/2013 12:33 AM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
I wonder how many telcos will still give you a plain leased line over
POTS...
Most all of them, if not ALL of them.
Leased lines, however, aren't POTS. POTS refers to single analog
phone lines, which leased lines (56K DDS, T1, T3, etc) are not.
Just a nit.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 01/18/2013 12:41 AM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
I wonder if there'd be any interest in cobbling up a little
microcontroller circuit that could convert synchronous serial to
Ethernet. We could use these to emulate leased lines on equipment
that doesn't even have Ethernet boards.
YES. Are you working with that sort of stuff? I ask because I am and
could probably do it.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA