On 2013-01-21 04:11, John H. Reinhardt wrote:
Re-sending during a lull in the action.
:-)
Sorry I dropped this. The bridge code can be found at http://www.update.uu.se/~bqt/hecnet
Areas were listed by Corey.
Johnny (now catching up...)
On 1/17/2013 8:20 AM, John H. Reinhardt wrote:
Hi Johnny,
My name is John Reinhardt. Long time HECnet lurker, occasional
poster and first time requester here. I'm about actually ready to put
some systems up and I'd like to request a HECnet area to use. Anything
that is free is fine, I don't have any special number desires.
I'm still working out how I will connect. I'm playing with the
virtual Cisco that Ian posted recently. Otherwise I may take a shot
at the bridge and see if I can get it running on my Vyatta
firewall/router.
Where is the latest version of the bridge code?
Regards,
John H. Reinhardt
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Yeah, it was running under Linux, I basically took the Linux sources of the PHONE client and stripped it down to the DIR call, then just ran that over the whole nodelist every 5-10 mins.
Anyway, this latest thing I've built is literally a few .COM files that talk to a server on RHESUS.
sampsa
On 21 Jan 2013, at 08:44, Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> wrote:
On 18/01/2013 16:06, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-01-18 07:41, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Half a year or maybe a year ago. Sampsa was running a program which used PHONE to check who was logged in on various machines. When he tried all machines in area 1, MIM got loads of entries in the log for Sampsa's machine trying to talk with machines that were down.
(I might be remembering things wrong, and I might be mixing things up, but it was not as if MIM crashed or anything because of Sampsa's code, but I asked him to stop, as he was filling up plenty of logs as far as I can remember.)
Yeah, I didn't mean crashed MIM or anything, but caused problems - basically the phone directory just went through the nodelist and did a PHONE DIR to them..If a node was down, the call would fail.
It wasn't a good idea from BQT's side :)
I don't remember all the details now, but I think it was something with the DECnet stack you used which made this worse. I seem to remember trying the same thing myself in various ways I couldn't trigger the logging. Did you run it under Linux, or what was it?
Johnny
I seem to remember it was running under the decnet stack on linux?
On 18/01/2013 16:06, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-01-18 07:41, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Half a year or maybe a year ago. Sampsa was running a program which used PHONE to check who was logged in on various machines. When he tried all machines in area 1, MIM got loads of entries in the log for Sampsa's machine trying to talk with machines that were down.
(I might be remembering things wrong, and I might be mixing things up, but it was not as if MIM crashed or anything because of Sampsa's code, but I asked him to stop, as he was filling up plenty of logs as far as I can remember.)
Yeah, I didn't mean crashed MIM or anything, but caused problems - basically the phone directory just went through the nodelist and did a PHONE DIR to them..If a node was down, the call would fail.
It wasn't a good idea from BQT's side :)
I don't remember all the details now, but I think it was something with the DECnet stack you used which made this worse. I seem to remember trying the same thing myself in various ways I couldn't trigger the logging. Did you run it under Linux, or what was it?
Johnny
I seem to remember it was running under the decnet stack on linux?
On 2013-01-20, at 9:05 PM, "John H. Reinhardt" <johnhreinhardt at yahoo.com> wrote:
I'm also playing with the virtual Cisco, but I'm unsure where to place it in my network. A simplistic diagram is here
http://s295.beta.photobucket.com/user/reinhardtjh/media/DataCenter/Network_…
It depends on where in your network you want to put your VAXen. In your diagram, are your VAXen plugged in to the "Local LAN network" ? If so, put your virtual router in this network, and give it a fixed IP address for that subnet. Your virtual router will act as a "router on a stick" - meaning it's got one physical interface. Tunnel traffic will come in via port forwarding from your Vyatta. The virtual router will un-encapsulate the traffic, and route the DECnet traffic back out the same physical interface, where your VAX machines will see it.
Your Vyatta will need to be configured to route GRE traffic (which is the packet type for the tunnel) to your virtual router.
Ian
On 20 Jan 2013, at 22:11, "John H. Reinhardt" <johnhreinhardt at yahoo.com> wrote:
Re-sending during a lull in the action.
Pick from: 14, 17, 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 45, 46, 48, 49, 50, 58
(I may have made some errors there, but those seem to be the available areas) and let Johnny know which you've picked.
The bridge should run on Vyatta fine, i'm not sure of where to grab the current code though.
On 1/17/2013 8:20 AM, John H. Reinhardt wrote:
Hi Johnny,
My name is John Reinhardt. Long time HECnet lurker, occasional poster and first time requester here. I'm about actually ready to put some systems up and I'd like to request a HECnet area to use. Anything that is free is fine, I don't have any special number desires.
I'm still working out how I will connect. I'm playing with the virtual Cisco that Ian posted recently. Otherwise I may take a shot at the bridge and see if I can get it running on my Vyatta firewall/router.
Where is the latest version of the bridge code?
Regards,
John H. Reinhardt
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Re-sending during a lull in the action.
On 1/17/2013 8:20 AM, John H. Reinhardt wrote:
Hi Johnny,
My name is John Reinhardt. Long time HECnet lurker, occasional poster and first time requester here. I'm about actually ready to put some systems up and I'd like to request a HECnet area to use. Anything that is free is fine, I don't have any special number desires.
I'm still working out how I will connect. I'm playing with the virtual Cisco that Ian posted recently. Otherwise I may take a shot at the bridge and see if I can get it running on my Vyatta firewall/router.
Where is the latest version of the bridge code?
Regards,
John H. Reinhardt
On 01/18/2013 08:36 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
and that USB<->serial adapters don't
work well (wrong)
Try telling that to Cisco. Their new devices come with a USB port
instead of a serial port for console.
Wanna know what it is? It's a USB<->serial adapter built into the
device. :)
That was smart! It's not a matter of them not working well, though,
I'd bet...it's more a matter of techs complaining about having to carry
around something else.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 1/18/2013 8:38 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Well, do you own anything that accepts DisplayPort?;)
Nope. Looks like I get to buy all new cables. That being said, I rarely plug this thing into anything external and the docking station has a DVI port, so if I really wanted an external monitor I'd just use that.
-brian
On 18 Jan 2013, at 20:37, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/18/2013 8:35 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
If you can believe it or not my new laptop actually has a serial port. The funny thing is the old one didn't.:)
Who made them though? (Old and new)
HP. Old one was an EliteBook 8540p. New one is an EliteBook 8560p.
They also ditched the HDMI port in favor of a DisplayPort one. Still not sure how I feel about that.
Well, do you own anything that accepts DisplayPort? ;)
-brian
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.