On 21 Jan 2013, at 15:00, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/21/2013 09:30 AM, John H. Reinhardt wrote:
You have a working binary for PuTTY on OS X? I'm forced to use
Windows for work and I use PuTTY every day there. I'd love to have a
copy for my home Macs. Where is it available?
I heard recently that PuTTY had been ported to OS X. There seems to
be no point at all to this.
Open a Terminal, type "ssh <hostname>"...what's so tough about that?
It works fine.
Terminal.app doesn't provide a shiny GUI to connect to physical serial ports. ;)
(yes, I know GNU screen can do it too. I agree it seems fairly pointless.)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 01/21/2013 09:41 AM, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
Google MacPorts and PuTTY. You'll have to build it. I did it back when
I was still running 10.4.something on the Mac as an academic exercise.
I don't really use it on Linux either.
PuTTY has been ported to Linux too? WTF? WHY?!
I'm more content with an xterm
and typing 'ssh ...'. To me, the command line is so much easier than a
GUI for something this simple. It's also easier when setting up various
port ssh-tunnels, IMNSHO.
Yes.
I only mentioned PuTTY because I know the WEENDOZE camp is command line
challeneged.
That's one way to put it. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 01/21/2013 09:30 AM, John H. Reinhardt wrote:
You have a working binary for PuTTY on OS X? I'm forced to use
Windows for work and I use PuTTY every day there. I'd love to have a
copy for my home Macs. Where is it available?
I heard recently that PuTTY had been ported to OS X. There seems to
be no point at all to this.
Open a Terminal, type "ssh <hostname>"...what's so tough about that?
It works fine.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 21 Jan 2013, at 12:44, "Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-" <system at TMESIS.COM> wrote:
Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> writes:
I was absolutely surprised at how well Mac OS X's Terminal.app handled =
that test.
Yup. And the DECSWL and DECDWL (Test 4) work!!!
That test is tremendously fun. It also reminded me I disabled blinking text. ;)
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
On 21 Jan 2013, at 09:16, "Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-" <system at TMESIS.COM> wrote:
Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com> writes:
Dave McGuire wrote: > I've heard it a lot. It's just the Windows
people. "Terminal > programs are EXPENSIVE!" No. Idiots. Go get a
grownup OS and leave > Windows for the videogames.
Off the top of my head, I can name at least two dozen easy-to-install
free terminal emulators for Windows. There are probably a great many
more than that.
Is PuTTY not available for WEENDOZE???
On Mac OS X and Linux, it does a failrly reasonable job of digesting the
VT200 series escape sequences and even does DECSWL and DECDHL correctly.
If you want to test your emulator, telnet to great-escape.tmesis.com and
log in with VTTEST -- no password. It's a captive account that runs the
VTTEST suite.
I was absolutely surprised at how well Mac OS X's Terminal.app handled that test.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman-
<system at tmesis.com> wrote:
"John H. Reinhardt" <johnhreinhardt at yahoo.com> writes:
You have a working binary for PuTTY on OS X? I'm forced to use
Windows for work and I use PuTTY every day there. I'd love to have a
copy for my home Macs. Where is it available?
Google MacPorts and PuTTY. You'll have to build it. I did it back when
I was still running 10.4.something on the Mac as an academic exercise.
I don't really use it on Linux either. I'm more content with an xterm
and typing 'ssh ...'. To me, the command line is so much easier than a
GUI for something this simple. It's also easier when setting up various
port ssh-tunnels, IMNSHO.
I only mentioned PuTTY because I know the WEENDOZE camp is command line
challeneged.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
Hello!
I'm not command line challenged.
But I also use PuTTY on both Windows (here) and Linux. I've also built
it for my Slackware Linux system.
This discussion is becoming decidedly strange. The big problem here is
simply making things easier to work with.
However what further progress has been accomplished in sorting out how
to deliver serial over Ethernet directly?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
"John H. Reinhardt" <johnhreinhardt at yahoo.com> writes:
You have a working binary for PuTTY on OS X? I'm forced to use
Windows for work and I use PuTTY every day there. I'd love to have a
copy for my home Macs. Where is it available?
Google MacPorts and PuTTY. You'll have to build it. I did it back when
I was still running 10.4.something on the Mac as an academic exercise.
I don't really use it on Linux either. I'm more content with an xterm
and typing 'ssh ...'. To me, the command line is so much easier than a
GUI for something this simple. It's also easier when setting up various
port ssh-tunnels, IMNSHO.
I only mentioned PuTTY because I know the WEENDOZE camp is command line
challeneged.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
On 1/21/2013 9:16 AM, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
Sridhar Ayengar<ploopster at gmail.com> writes:
Dave McGuire wrote:> I've heard it a lot. It's just the Windows
people. "Terminal> programs are EXPENSIVE!" No. Idiots. Go get a
grownup OS and leave> Windows for the videogames.
Off the top of my head, I can name at least two dozen easy-to-install
free terminal emulators for Windows. There are probably a great many
more than that.
Is PuTTY not available for WEENDOZE???
On Mac OS X and Linux, it does a failrly reasonable job of digesting the
VT200 series escape sequences and even does DECSWL and DECDHL correctly.
If you want to test your emulator, telnet to great-escape.tmesis.com and
log in with VTTEST -- no password. It's a captive account that runs the
VTTEST suite.
Brian,
You have a working binary for PuTTY on OS X? I'm forced to use Windows for work and I use PuTTY every day there. I'd love to have a copy for my home Macs. Where is it available?
John
Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster at gmail.com> writes:
Dave McGuire wrote: > I've heard it a lot. It's just the Windows
people. "Terminal > programs are EXPENSIVE!" No. Idiots. Go get a
grownup OS and leave > Windows for the videogames.
Off the top of my head, I can name at least two dozen easy-to-install
free terminal emulators for Windows. There are probably a great many
more than that.
Is PuTTY not available for WEENDOZE???
On Mac OS X and Linux, it does a failrly reasonable job of digesting the
VT200 series escape sequences and even does DECSWL and DECDHL correctly.
If you want to test your emulator, telnet to great-escape.tmesis.com and
log in with VTTEST -- no password. It's a captive account that runs the
VTTEST suite.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
Dave McGuire wrote:
I've heard it a lot. It's just the Windows people. "Terminal
programs are EXPENSIVE!" No. Idiots. Go get a grownup OS and leave
Windows for the videogames.
Off the top of my head, I can name at least two dozen easy-to-install free terminal emulators for Windows. There are probably a great many more than that.
Peace... Sridhar