HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

7 participants
15595 discussions

by sampsa＠mac.com

Home delivery, would you believe it. Saku Setala is one awesome dude. Sampsa On 29 Nov 2012, at 17:11, Mark Wickens wrote: On 29/11/2012 15:06, Sampsa Laine wrote: Got two free MicroVAX 3400s.. Sampsa On 29 Nov 2012, at 16:35, Mark Wickens wrote: On 29/11/2012 14:29, Sampsa Laine wrote: Johnny, can you register the following node: SIIRI 47.1113 What you bought now :) Did you go pick them up?

13 years, 3 months

New node registration

by mark＠wickensonline.co.uk

On 29/11/2012 15:06, Sampsa Laine wrote: Got two free MicroVAX 3400s.. Sampsa On 29 Nov 2012, at 16:35, Mark Wickens wrote: On 29/11/2012 14:29, Sampsa Laine wrote: Johnny, can you register the following node: SIIRI 47.1113 What you bought now :) Did you go pick them up?

13 years, 3 months

New node registration

by sampsa＠mac.com

Got two free MicroVAX 3400s.. Sampsa On 29 Nov 2012, at 16:35, Mark Wickens wrote: On 29/11/2012 14:29, Sampsa Laine wrote: Johnny, can you register the following node: SIIRI 47.1113 What you bought now :)

13 years, 3 months

New node registration

by mark＠wickensonline.co.uk

On 29/11/2012 14:29, Sampsa Laine wrote: Johnny, can you register the following node: SIIRI 47.1113 What you bought now :)

13 years, 3 months

New node registration

by sampsa＠mac.com

Johnny, can you register the following node: SIIRI 47.1113

13 years, 3 months

Anyone running KLH10 in the Raspberry Pi?

by jg＠jordi.guillaumes.name

Al 28/11/12 22:47, En/na Paul_Koning at Dell.com ha escrit: Is Pi big endian? Does KLH10 assume little endian? Pi is little endian. And, to add some weirdness to this, I have just completed a TOPS-20 boot using the very same binaries... (It does not use klboot.exe)

13 years, 3 months

Anyone running KLH10 in the Raspberry Pi?

by Paul_Koning＠Dell.com

Is Pi big endian? Does KLH10 assume little endian? paul On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote: Al 28/11/12 22:42, En/na Cory Smelosky ha escrit: Anyone has gone past this? I've not, but is it possibly related to solftfloat versus hardfloat ABI in some distr I have built it from sources... I don't think the ABI differences can make any difference. But I could be wrong if KLH10 uses something really tied to the host hardware.

13 years, 3 months

Anyone running KLH10 in the Raspberry Pi?

by jg＠jordi.guillaumes.name

Al 28/11/12 22:42, En/na Cory Smelosky ha escrit: Anyone has gone past this? I've not, but is it possibly related to solftfloat versus hardfloat ABI in some distr I have built it from sources... I don't think the ABI differences can make any difference. But I could be wrong if KLH10 uses something really tied to the host hardware.

13 years, 3 months

Anyone running KLH10 in the Raspberry Pi?

by b4＠gewt.net

On 28 Nov 2012, at 16:40, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> wrote: I have compiled KLH10 in the Pi, following the indications in this post: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/alt.sys.pdp10/vHcQ49tjM… After correcting a stupid syntax error I get a mostly clean compilation, but when I try to run TOPS-10 on it (cloning a configuration that works in an intel machine), I get this: KLH10# load klboot.exe Using word format "c36"... Loading aborted, read failed for file page 1, proc page 0 Loading aborted, read failed for file page 2, proc page 448 Loading aborted, read failed for file page 4, proc page 451 Loaded "klboot.exe": Format: DEC-PEXE Of course it does not boot... Anyone has gone past this? I've not, but is it possibly related to solftfloat versus hardfloat ABI in some distros?

13 years, 3 months

3B1s and "old school" UNIX, was Re: [HECnet] US Seller with some interesting stuff

by clemc＠ccc.com

I think you are describing the 3B20S. Looked like a VAX/780 (but had a pull starter ;) for the battery bring up. The duplex 3B20D was the control systems for the 5ESS. After the consent decree was dropped, AT&T tried to market the S (simplex) version as a general purpose computer. IIRC the 3B20 >>architecture<< became the WE32100 microprocessor that was used in the desktop machines. Clem On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Boyanich, Alastair <Alastair.Boyanich at au.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Hello! > He's thinking of the WE designed processors that were used in the > later units. They were not bit slice but were fabricated using the > normal methods. Not surprisingly enough the devices could not even be > sold separately. > > They were ran an appropriately written release of UNIX as native. One > of the first applications for them and the later models was in running > the first and second generation Electronic Switching Services > otherwise known as exchanges. > > There's a whole article online someplace on the RT extensions that > needed to be written out and added to UNIX for that application. Hi Greg, Maybe it wasn't bit-sliced then.. interesting, but this seems to fit as it was definitely: a) a different ISA to the m68k stuff. Wouldn't even disassemble. b) telco gear for very large PABX/exchange switching/management c) UNIX (tm) based. Al.

13 years, 3 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet