HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

7 participants
15595 discussions

by b4＠gewt.net

I'm in. Fairly certain I can set that up in the coming few days. -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org My pet project, permanently a work in progress. On Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 17:20, sampsa at mac.com wrote: I don't think anything aside from a static IP and a VAX machine running Phase V and X.25.. Sampsa On 17 Dec 2012, at 00:16, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 16 Dec 2012, at 17:15, sampsa at mac.com wrote: On a related note, anyone want to play with setting up a pair of Phase V nodes with X.25 and getting the XOT (X.25 over TCP/IP) working? :) Depends, what special stuff would I need? ;)

13 years, 3 months

ATTN: Johnny BQT - area 8 bridge IP change to 46.65.175.115

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 12/16/2012 06:28 PM, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote: Identification = SC40M, Stupi Stockholm, Tops20 State = On, Active links = 0 I'm just drooling... ;) Whew, I'm glad I wasn't the only one! -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

13 years, 3 months

ATTN: Johnny BQT - area 8 bridge IP change to 46.65.175.115

by jg＠jordi.guillaumes.name

El 16/12/2012, a les 21:28, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> va escriure: Identification = SC40M, Stupi Stockholm, Tops20 State = On, Active links = 0 I'm just drooling... ;) Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

13 years, 3 months

VAX compiler kits

by bob＠jfcl.com

Hey, might I be welcome to grab a copy of these as well? Yeah, what he said :-) At least for the kits that aren't on the Montagar Hobbyist CDROM. Thanks, Bob

13 years, 3 months

DECnet over IP question...

by gregg.drwho8＠gmail.com

On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:15 PM, <sampsa at mac.com> wrote: On a related note, anyone want to play with setting up a pair of Phase V nodes with X.25 and getting the XOT (X.25 over TCP/IP) working? :) Hello! I thought both X.25 was largely an obsolete protocol, that did so about the time dialup service became largely old news? And what finally became of the idea of implementing dialup (Over POTS) to take over when our largely persistent connections become not working? Incidentally Dave right now there is a large furry annoyed and rather wet individual attempting to cause major mayhem in your area. Sampsa a troll is busy building a roadblock over a bridge near you. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."

13 years, 3 months

DECnet over IP question...

by HECNET＠beyondthepale.ie

I've seen one or two weird things in Phase V backward compatibility in the past, but for the most part, it works just fine. In a previous job, we reluctantly had to use Phase V on Alpha VMS. I never saw any problems with compatibility with Phase IV but despite numerous patches, there were reliability issues (and to a lesser extent performance issues) that never quite went away until the application requiring Phase V was withdrawn and we were able to "upgrade" to Phase IV again :-) Regards, Peter Coghlan.

13 years, 3 months

DECnet over IP question...

by sampsa＠mac.com

I don't think anything aside from a static IP and a VAX machine running Phase V and X.25.. Sampsa On 17 Dec 2012, at 00:16, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 16 Dec 2012, at 17:15, sampsa at mac.com wrote: On a related note, anyone want to play with setting up a pair of Phase V nodes with X.25 and getting the XOT (X.25 over TCP/IP) working? :) Depends, what special stuff would I need? ;)

13 years, 3 months

DECnet over IP question...

by b4＠gewt.net

On 16 Dec 2012, at 17:15, sampsa at mac.com wrote: On a related note, anyone want to play with setting up a pair of Phase V nodes with X.25 and getting the XOT (X.25 over TCP/IP) working? :) Depends, what special stuff would I need? ;)

13 years, 3 months

DECnet over IP question...

by sampsa＠mac.com

On a related note, anyone want to play with setting up a pair of Phase V nodes with X.25 and getting the XOT (X.25 over TCP/IP) working? :)

13 years, 3 months

DECnet over IP question...

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2012-12-16 22:57, Cory Smelosky wrote: On 16 Dec 2012, at 16:50, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: Do anyone know if DECnet phase V can do DECnet over IP, and if that is compatible with - say - Multinet connections? Or else, if anyone on this list is running a phase V node with area routing, who could act as a connection point. Johnny Semi-related, but can Phase V interact with Phase IV at all? Certainly. Phase V nodes can talk just fine with Phase IV. The major "headache" is that NCP is gone, and you have a totally new way of managing things, and a new system for node names. While it might be better, it's totally unrelated to how nodenames are managed in Phase IV, so that can be a headache. I've seen one or two weird things in Phase V backward compatibility in the past, but for the most part, it works just fine. Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

13 years, 3 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet