On 12/17/2012 11:53 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2012-12-17 17:40, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Do people really want digest mode here?
Yes (for me, at least - I always have!). And an archive of past messages
would be really nice...
Ok. We'll hopefully have digest sorted once we move from Majordomo. As for archives, gha... Yes, I have everything, but I need to scrub it of personal messages, as well as figure out how to make it accessible. That part I'm open to suggestions about.
If you move to mailman you should be able to just dump them into mailman and let it handle it for you.
-brian
On 2012-12-17 17:40, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Do people really want digest mode here?
Yes (for me, at least - I always have!). And an archive of past messages
would be really nice...
Ok. We'll hopefully have digest sorted once we move from Majordomo. As for archives, gha... Yes, I have everything, but I need to scrub it of personal messages, as well as figure out how to make it accessible. That part I'm open to suggestions about.
Johnny
On 12/17/2012 11:41 AM, Phil Mendelsohn wrote:
(filtering was sufficient until mobile devices entered the fray.)
Filtering will again be sufficient if you do it on the server side.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
RHESUS serves node info on these by the way, the URL is:
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/cgi-bin/hecnetinfo/hecnetinfo.com
sampsa
On 17 Dec 2012, at 18:40, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
Well, I figured it might be fun for people to know that there are, as of this moment, 405 known node names at MIM.
Not bad...
I know there are some more coming in, and in general, there is a steady stream of new registrations.
Speaking of which, is noone running a phase V area router? (Or could phase V not even be an area router?)
Johnny
Pardon phone top-posting.
I would VERY much like digest. May have to unsubscribe w/o, which reduces chance putting my DEC gear online to nil. :(
(filtering was sufficient until mobile devices entered the fray.)
"Worry is a misuse of imagination." -Dan Zadra
Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
Well, I figured it might be fun for people to know that there are, as of this moment, 405 known node names at MIM.
Not bad...
I know there are some more coming in, and in general, there is a steady stream of new registrations.
Speaking of which, is noone running a phase V area router? (Or could phase V not even be an area router?)
Johnny
On 2012-12-17 17:33, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
On 2012-12-17 17:11, Bob Armstrong wrote:
It probably takes longer to find a sysadmin than to set up.
The GNU/Mailman stuff is already set up - I can have a new
list up and
running in ten minutes.
I don't want to fracture the HECnet list by creating two,
though, so I'd
like to see some kind of majority agreement on moving first.
Not really fond of the idea of moving the list... Any particular
problems with the current setup? Do people really want digest mode here?
Yes. It isn't currently hosted on TOPS-20. ;)
That, that I could almost agree on. :-)
Actually, a mail daemon for RSX is in my plans... Once I've done that, I'll fix a mail list manager as well, and then I can have all the fun in the world... ;-)
On a semi-related semi-serious note, would anyone here use...what was it
that was the TOPS-20 mailing list thing...bboard? Maybe we could
subscribe it to HECnet? ;)
Not sure I agree subscribing lists to lists is a good idea. There might be legitimate reasons for people to be subscribed to one, but not the other.
Same thing for the pdp-11 mailing lists.
Johnny
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2012-12-17 17:11, Bob Armstrong wrote:
It probably takes longer to find a sysadmin than to set up.
The GNU/Mailman stuff is already set up - I can have a new list up and
running in ten minutes.
I don't want to fracture the HECnet list by creating two, though, so I'd
like to see some kind of majority agreement on moving first.
Not really fond of the idea of moving the list... Any particular problems with the current setup? Do people really want digest mode here?
Yes. It isn't currently hosted on TOPS-20. ;)
On a semi-related semi-serious note, would anyone here use...what was it that was the TOPS-20 mailing list thing...bboard? Maybe we could subscribe it to HECnet? ;)
However, majordomo is a problem for various reasons anyway, and there are some activity to replace the whole thing, but no real time plans.
Johnny
On 2012-12-17 17:11, Bob Armstrong wrote:
It probably takes longer to find a sysadmin than to set up.
The GNU/Mailman stuff is already set up - I can have a new list up and
running in ten minutes.
I don't want to fracture the HECnet list by creating two, though, so I'd
like to see some kind of majority agreement on moving first.
Not really fond of the idea of moving the list... Any particular problems with the current setup? Do people really want digest mode here?
However, majordomo is a problem for various reasons anyway, and there are some activity to replace the whole thing, but no real time plans.
Johnny
