HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

4 participants
15588 discussions

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 9 Jan 2013, at 22:48, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-01-10 04:42, Cory Smelosky wrote: On 9 Jan 2013, at 22:40, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-01-10 04:37, Cory Smelosky wrote: On 9 Jan 2013, at 22:35, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: His end has other functioning links, and his tunnel to me is the inverse. Any ideas? I hope 61.1 is an area router It is. Which is what makes this so confusing In that case, the next question is obviously how the DECnet routing table at 61.1 looks like. I'm curious as to what the table on 61.1 is as well. Might be a red herring, though. I would perhaps assume that 61.1 is routing things for other networks just fine, and only you have issues? Correct. Only I have issues. Actually, why don't you have an entry for area 61 in your routing table? I have absolutely no clue does it need to be added manually? I don't know enough about Cisco to say, but it seems *very* weird to me that you don't have area 61 in there. How would you expect packets to 61.x find their way anywhere? Amusingly enough, packets to 61.x get there fine. Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

13 years

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-01-10 04:42, Cory Smelosky wrote: On 9 Jan 2013, at 22:40, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-01-10 04:37, Cory Smelosky wrote: On 9 Jan 2013, at 22:35, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: His end has other functioning links, and his tunnel to me is the inverse. Any ideas? I hope 61.1 is an area router It is. Which is what makes this so confusing In that case, the next question is obviously how the DECnet routing table at 61.1 looks like. I'm curious as to what the table on 61.1 is as well. Might be a red herring, though. I would perhaps assume that 61.1 is routing things for other networks just fine, and only you have issues? Actually, why don't you have an entry for area 61 in your routing table? I have absolutely no clue does it need to be added manually? I don't know enough about Cisco to say, but it seems *very* weird to me that you don't have area 61 in there. How would you expect packets to 61.x find their way anywhere? Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

13 years

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 01/09/2013 10:40 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote: In that case, the next question is obviously how the DECnet routing table at 61.1 looks like. Area Cost Hops Next Hop to Node Expires Prio *1 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *2 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *3 14 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *4 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *5 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *6 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *7 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *8 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *9 10 1 Tunnel6 -> 9.1023 38 64 A+ *11 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *12 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *18 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *19 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *20 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *28 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *33 12 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *42 10 1 Tunnel4 -> 42.1023 35 64 A+ *44 11 2 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *47 13 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *51 13 3 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 *52 10 1 Tunnel1 -> 52.1 37 64 A+ *59 10 1 Tunnel5 -> 59.11 41 64 A+ Actually, why don't you have an entry for area 61 in your routing table? That's a damn good question. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

13 years

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 9 Jan 2013, at 22:40, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-01-10 04:37, Cory Smelosky wrote: On 9 Jan 2013, at 22:35, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: His end has other functioning links, and his tunnel to me is the inverse. Any ideas? I hope 61.1 is an area router It is. Which is what makes this so confusing In that case, the next question is obviously how the DECnet routing table at 61.1 looks like. I'm curious as to what the table on 61.1 is as well. Actually, why don't you have an entry for area 61 in your routing table? I have absolutely no clue does it need to be added manually? Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

13 years

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-01-10 04:37, Cory Smelosky wrote: On 9 Jan 2013, at 22:35, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: His end has other functioning links, and his tunnel to me is the inverse. Any ideas? I hope 61.1 is an area router It is. Which is what makes this so confusing In that case, the next question is obviously how the DECnet routing table at 61.1 looks like. Actually, why don't you have an entry for area 61 in your routing table? Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

13 years

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 01/09/2013 10:35 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote: However! Despite this tunnel being identical to the other tunnels, I am unable to reach the rest of HECnet via the tunnel to him. ... His end has other functioning links, and his tunnel to me is the inverse. Any ideas? I hope 61.1 is an area router... It is, and there are other tunnels terminating here which are working. Unfortunately I am buried in work tonight and can't hack on this much further. Do you have any thoughts on what might be screwing things up? -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

13 years

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 9 Jan 2013, at 22:35, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: On 2013-01-10 04:29, Cory Smelosky wrote: Hello, all! Dave and I have been attempting to establish a link between us using dynamips on my end, and real cisco gear on his end and we've hit some issues. The GRE tunnel comes up fine, I can ping DECnet nodes on his end, and I can set host to nodes in his area. It is also possible for nodes in his area to reach nodes in my area so packets are indeed getting /somewhere/. However! Despite this tunnel being identical to the other tunnels, I am unable to reach the rest of HECnet via the tunnel to him. Here's the output of SHOW DECNET ROUTE: --- marianne#sh decnet route Area Cost Hops Next Hop to Node Expires Prio *1 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *2 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *3 19 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *4 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *5 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *6 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *7 18 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *8 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *9 0 0 (Local) -> 9.1023 *11 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *12 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *18 17 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *19 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *20 17 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *28 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *33 17 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *42 15 2 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *44 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *47 18 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *51 18 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *52 15 2 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *59 15 2 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 --- And ping: --- marianne#ping 61.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 61.1, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 40/56/76 ms marianne#ping 61.3 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 61.3, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 44/56/68 ms marianne#ping 1.13 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds: ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) --- My tunnel config: --- interface Tunnel0 description Tunnel to HECnet (Dave) no ip address decnet cost 5 tunnel source Ethernet1/0 tunnel destination <his ip> tunnel path-mtu-discovery --- Ethernet1/0: --- interface Ethernet1/0 ip address 10.10.10.99 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache duplex full decnet cost 10 --- Overall DECnet config: --- decnet routing 9.1023 decnet node-type area --- His end has other functioning links, and his tunnel to me is the inverse. Any ideas? I hope 61.1 is an area router It is. Which is what makes this so confusing Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

13 years

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-01-10 04:29, Cory Smelosky wrote: Hello, all! Dave and I have been attempting to establish a link between us using dynamips on my end, and real cisco gear on his end and we've hit some issues. The GRE tunnel comes up fine, I can ping DECnet nodes on his end, and I can set host to nodes in his area. It is also possible for nodes in his area to reach nodes in my area so packets are indeed getting /somewhere/. However! Despite this tunnel being identical to the other tunnels, I am unable to reach the rest of HECnet via the tunnel to him. Here's the output of SHOW DECNET ROUTE: --- marianne#sh decnet route Area Cost Hops Next Hop to Node Expires Prio *1 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *2 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *3 19 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *4 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *5 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *6 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *7 18 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *8 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *9 0 0 (Local) -> 9.1023 *11 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *12 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *18 17 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *19 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *20 17 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *28 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *33 17 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *42 15 2 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *44 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *47 18 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *51 18 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *52 15 2 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *59 15 2 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 --- And ping: --- marianne#ping 61.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 61.1, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 40/56/76 ms marianne#ping 61.3 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 61.3, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 44/56/68 ms marianne#ping 1.13 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds: ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) --- My tunnel config: --- interface Tunnel0 description Tunnel to HECnet (Dave) no ip address decnet cost 5 tunnel source Ethernet1/0 tunnel destination <his ip> tunnel path-mtu-discovery --- Ethernet1/0: --- interface Ethernet1/0 ip address 10.10.10.99 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache duplex full decnet cost 10 --- Overall DECnet config: --- decnet routing 9.1023 decnet node-type area --- His end has other functioning links, and his tunnel to me is the inverse. Any ideas? I hope 61.1 is an area router... Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

13 years

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

Hello, all! Dave and I have been attempting to establish a link between us using dynamips on my end, and real cisco gear on his end and we've hit some issues. The GRE tunnel comes up fine, I can ping DECnet nodes on his end, and I can set host to nodes in his area. It is also possible for nodes in his area to reach nodes in my area so packets are indeed getting /somewhere/. However! Despite this tunnel being identical to the other tunnels, I am unable to reach the rest of HECnet via the tunnel to him. Here's the output of SHOW DECNET ROUTE: --- marianne#sh decnet route Area Cost Hops Next Hop to Node Expires Prio *1 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *2 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *3 19 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *4 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *5 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *6 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *7 18 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *8 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *9 0 0 (Local) -> 9.1023 *11 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *12 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *18 17 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *19 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *20 17 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *28 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *33 17 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *42 15 2 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *44 16 3 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *47 18 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *51 18 4 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *52 15 2 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 *59 15 2 Tunnel0 -> 61.1 --- And ping: --- marianne#ping 61.1 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 61.1, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 40/56/76 ms marianne#ping 61.3 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 61.3, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 44/56/68 ms marianne#ping 1.13 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds: ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) --- My tunnel config: --- interface Tunnel0 description Tunnel to HECnet (Dave) no ip address decnet cost 5 tunnel source Ethernet1/0 tunnel destination <his ip> tunnel path-mtu-discovery --- Ethernet1/0: --- interface Ethernet1/0 ip address 10.10.10.99 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache duplex full decnet cost 10 --- Overall DECnet config: --- decnet routing 9.1023 decnet node-type area --- His end has other functioning links, and his tunnel to me is the inverse. Any ideas? -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

13 years

MOP vs. Cisco, was Re: [HECnet] _PROVISIONAL_ map of HECnet, courtesy largely of Brian H.

by ian＠platinum.net

Set up for a cost of 20. Ian On 2013-01-09, at 5:18 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 9 Jan 2013, at 20:13, Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net> wrote: On 2013-01-09, at 5:09 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: Now, can someone give me an IP to use to test out my tunnel skills? :p Mine is 75.60.203.227. Settiong you uip on 174.4.172.207 - gimme a few minutes to get the firewall rules in Choose a different cost, I'll use you as a fallback link. 20? Ian -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project. --- Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=A186C6965AC311E2B…

13 years

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet