HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

2 participants
15583 discussions

[hvlems@zonnet.nl: Re: [HECnet] Request for comments on subdividing area 9]

by hvlems＠zonnet.nl

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens Peter Lothberg Verzonden: woensdag, januari 2013 15:03 Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Onderwerp: [hvlems at zonnet.nl: Re: [HECnet] Request for comments on <lots of useless bytes removed> No Peter, you didn't miss anything at all. Sometimes the topic carries me away and I reply from my blackberry. Sometimes that works for all of you, more often it doesn't... Hans

12 years, 10 months

SNMP MIBs and smidump

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

Anyone ever mess with this? wonko at fred$ smidump -f python OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:15: failed to locate MIB module `RFC-1212' OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:17: failed to locate MIB module `RFC1213-MIB' OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:19: failed to locate MIB module `CISCO-SMI' OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:21: unknown object identifier label `temporary' OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:283: index element `dnArea' of row `dnAreaTableEntry' must have a range restriction OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:443: index element `dnHIdx1' of row `dnHostTableEntry' must have a range restriction OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:451: index element `dnHIdx2' of row `dnHostTableEntry' must have a range restriction OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:476: unknown object identifier label `ifIndex' smidump: module `OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my' contains errors, expect flawed output smidump: aborting due to severe parsing errors smidump: use the -k option to force continuation wonko at fred$ I need to do that so I can convert it into whatever nonsense PySNMP needs. -brian

12 years, 10 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

On 1/10/2013 4:36 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Well. It works fine now. Wooo. marianne#ping 33.15 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 33.15, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 392/429/476 ms marianne#ping 1.13 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 180/219/252 ms I wonder why the times are so high :) Works here too. Looks like the routing tables probably just needed to sort themselves out. bart#ping 9.1023 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 76/79/84 ms bart#

12 years, 10 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 10 Jan 2013, at 16:32, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:57, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:52, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;) I got a different error though when that happened. What error? I got Host unreachable before. Before it was: my end -> VPN -> SIMH on vps -> SG1 Now it's: my end -> Dave's cisco using a GRE tunnel. Anything we're forgetting to update? Well. It works fine now. Wooo. marianne#ping 33.15 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 33.15, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 392/429/476 ms marianne#ping 1.13 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 180/219/252 ms I wonder why the times are so high :) -brian -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project. -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

12 years, 10 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:57, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:52, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;) I got a different error though when that happened. What error? I got Host unreachable before. Before it was: my end -> VPN -> SIMH on vps -> SG1 Now it's: my end -> Dave's cisco using a GRE tunnel. Anything we're forgetting to update? Well. It works fine now. Wooo. -brian -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

12 years, 10 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:52, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;) I got a different error though when that happened. What error? I got Host unreachable before. Before it was: my end -> VPN -> SIMH on vps -> SG1 Now it's: my end -> Dave's cisco using a GRE tunnel. Anything we're forgetting to update? -brian

12 years, 10 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;) > >I got a different error though when that happened. What error? I got Host unreachable before. -brian

12 years, 10 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:50, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:49 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:48, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net. Now pings just drop on the floor: bart#ping 9.1023 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds : ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router. ;) I got a different error though when that happened. What error? -brian

12 years, 10 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

On 1/10/2013 3:49 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:48, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net. Now pings just drop on the floor: bart#ping 9.1023 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds : ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router. ;) I got a different error though when that happened. -brian

12 years, 10 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:48, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net. Now pings just drop on the floor: bart#ping 9.1023 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds : ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router. ;)

12 years, 10 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet