HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

7 participants
15595 discussions

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by ian＠platinum.net

On 2013-01-10, at 2:15 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: Yay! It works properly. This is good news! Just to confirm, this is using GNS3/Dynamips, correct? Are you using one ethernet card or two? Ian

13 years, 2 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 10 Jan 2013, at 16:56, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 4:36 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Well. It works fine now. Wooo. marianne#ping 33.15 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 33.15, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 392/429/476 ms marianne#ping 1.13 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 180/219/252 ms I wonder why the times are so high :) Works here too. Looks like the routing tables probably just needed to sort themselves out. bart#ping 9.1023 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 76/79/84 ms bart# Yay! It works properly. -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

13 years, 2 months

[hvlems@zonnet.nl: Re: [HECnet] Request for comments on subdividing area 9]

by hvlems＠zonnet.nl

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens Peter Lothberg Verzonden: woensdag, januari 2013 15:03 Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Onderwerp: [hvlems at zonnet.nl: Re: [HECnet] Request for comments on <lots of useless bytes removed> No Peter, you didn't miss anything at all. Sometimes the topic carries me away and I reply from my blackberry. Sometimes that works for all of you, more often it doesn't... Hans

13 years, 2 months

SNMP MIBs and smidump

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

Anyone ever mess with this? wonko at fred$ smidump -f python OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:15: failed to locate MIB module `RFC-1212' OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:17: failed to locate MIB module `RFC1213-MIB' OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:19: failed to locate MIB module `CISCO-SMI' OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:21: unknown object identifier label `temporary' OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:283: index element `dnArea' of row `dnAreaTableEntry' must have a range restriction OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:443: index element `dnHIdx1' of row `dnHostTableEntry' must have a range restriction OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:451: index element `dnHIdx2' of row `dnHostTableEntry' must have a range restriction OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:476: unknown object identifier label `ifIndex' smidump: module `OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my' contains errors, expect flawed output smidump: aborting due to severe parsing errors smidump: use the -k option to force continuation wonko at fred$ I need to do that so I can convert it into whatever nonsense PySNMP needs. -brian

13 years, 2 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

On 1/10/2013 4:36 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Well. It works fine now. Wooo. marianne#ping 33.15 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 33.15, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 392/429/476 ms marianne#ping 1.13 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 180/219/252 ms I wonder why the times are so high :) Works here too. Looks like the routing tables probably just needed to sort themselves out. bart#ping 9.1023 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 76/79/84 ms bart#

13 years, 2 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 10 Jan 2013, at 16:32, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:57, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:52, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;) I got a different error though when that happened. What error? I got Host unreachable before. Before it was: my end -> VPN -> SIMH on vps -> SG1 Now it's: my end -> Dave's cisco using a GRE tunnel. Anything we're forgetting to update? Well. It works fine now. Wooo. marianne#ping 33.15 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 33.15, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 392/429/476 ms marianne#ping 1.13 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 180/219/252 ms I wonder why the times are so high :) -brian -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project. -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

13 years, 2 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:57, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:52, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;) I got a different error though when that happened. What error? I got Host unreachable before. Before it was: my end -> VPN -> SIMH on vps -> SG1 Now it's: my end -> Dave's cisco using a GRE tunnel. Anything we're forgetting to update? Well. It works fine now. Wooo. -brian -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

13 years, 2 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:52, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;) I got a different error though when that happened. What error? I got Host unreachable before. Before it was: my end -> VPN -> SIMH on vps -> SG1 Now it's: my end -> Dave's cisco using a GRE tunnel. Anything we're forgetting to update? -brian

13 years, 2 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;) > >I got a different error though when that happened. What error? I got Host unreachable before. -brian

13 years, 2 months

Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet

by b4＠gewt.net

On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:50, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:49 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:48, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net. Now pings just drop on the floor: bart#ping 9.1023 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds : ..... Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router. ;) I got a different error though when that happened. What error? -brian

13 years, 2 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet