On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
<jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> wrote:
Al 27/02/13 14:24, En/na Jacob Goense ha escrit:
On Wed, February 27, 2013 01:09, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Say what? Have simh added VAX 8600 emulation?
DMC11 devices too!
Yep... and now if I can find enough time I could try to interface that one
with the 3780 emulation in Hercules and get RJE working between a SIMH VAX
and MVS3.8J...
I'm pretty sure the needed PAKS are not in the Hobbyist set though...
Hello!
Other problem is that the 3780 emulation isn't completely up to what
any of us, want to do. There's a TODO list that reads like the one the
MTA (here) for their maintenance schedule for working on the subway
system. Long and time consuming....
Incidentally this is not your fault Dave.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
Al 27/02/13 14:24, En/na Jacob Goense ha escrit:
On Wed, February 27, 2013 01:09, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Say what? Have simh added VAX 8600 emulation?
DMC11 devices too!
Yep... and now if I can find enough time I could try to interface that one with the 3780 emulation in Hercules and get RJE working between a SIMH VAX and MVS3.8J...
I'm pretty sure the needed PAKS are not in the Hobbyist set though...
Al 27/02/13 09:42, En/na Dave McGuire ha escrit:
I assume all of this is in the repository...Is there going to be a new
release soon?
Mark tagged the current HEAD as beta some weeks ago, but there is no word about the release date yet. For what I'm seeing, there are no serious bugs in the current master branch, at least in the VAX and PDP-11 simulators. I have been using the testing versions for a time, and they seem to be stable.
Of course beware there could be obscure bugs... for instance we catched one in the PDP-11 simulator which manifested itself JUST at the SAV /WB command... The simulator worked fine thru the SYSGEN time... just to render your disk unbootable after SAVing the new system image. :)
I assume all of this is in the repository...Is there going to be a new
release soon?
-Dave
On 02/27/2013 02:53 AM, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Yes! And microVAX I and II as well as 11/730, 11//750 and a VAXrt.
As for the accuracy, I know it does the full VAX instruction set (including compatibility mode) but can't be sure about the bus and hardware. I know it does not have an emulated PDP11 as console, so it is certainly not 100% accurate.
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
Barcelona - Catalunya - Europa
El 27/02/2013, a les 1:09, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> va escriure:
Say what? Have simh added VAX 8600 emulation? Do you know how accurate that is? I have plenty of code for NetBSD which plays with that machine (I have a real machine to work on).
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Yes! And microVAX I and II as well as 11/730, 11//750 and a VAXrt.
As for the accuracy, I know it does the full VAX instruction set (including compatibility mode) but can't be sure about the bus and hardware. I know it does not have an emulated PDP11 as console, so it is certainly not 100% accurate.
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
Barcelona - Catalunya - Europa
El 27/02/2013, a les 1:09, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> va escriure:
Say what? Have simh added VAX 8600 emulation? Do you know how accurate that is? I have plenty of code for NetBSD which plays with that machine (I have a real machine to work on).
On 2013-02-25 15:07, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Please add this node to the nodelist:
7.74 BITXOW (SIMH VAX 8600, OpenVMS 6.1)
Thanks!
Say what? Have simh added VAX 8600 emulation? Do you know how accurate that is? I have plenty of code for NetBSD which plays with that machine (I have a real machine to work on).
Anyway, node added.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2013-02-23 07:19, Julian Wolfe wrote:
We actually got a VPN going, and this solved the problem. My machine is part of Area 18 now and is called FLIND (18.777).
Excellent. I'll drop you on my bridge then.
You can remove BIGBOA (1.42) for the time being.
Done. (As well as FLIND)
Johnny
On Feb 22, 2013, at 2:55 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2013-02-22 19:37, Julian Wolfe wrote:
HI all,
Registered on HECnet many years ago, but was never able to get on for long or at all in the past. Now it seems this problem plagues me yet again in a different form.
I've got a PDP-11/23+ running RSTS/E 10.1 and DECnet/E 4.1 behind a DD-WRT router in my basement (WRT54GS, DD-WRT build 13064), and this is behind an AT&T U-Verse router. Something is going on with the packet source ports - they are being marked with a randomized source port.
My questions are: Does the source port matter, when using Johnny's bridge, and he knows my port?
If the port does matter, has anyone experienced this issue (specifically on AT&T U-Verse or otherwise) and solved it?
Is this something I can fix myself, or do I need to look for another solution?
The wierd part is, I used the bridge successfully for 2 days with the bridge installed on a Mac running Mac OS X 10.8. This machine was also talking through a different WRT54GS with DD-WRT build 13064 and identical settings to the other router (client bridged mode). I then moved the PDP to the basement with the rest of my servers, had it go through the linux box for the bridge, and suddenly the packets have this mangles source port. I tried switching it back to the Mac, and now this problem has cropped up there too.
Phew! Help! I just want to hang out with yous guys :)
I've hit the problem with mangled ports in the past. Yes, it certainly do matter for the bridge (or anything else using UDP). Not only a security issue, but you peer needs to know where to send his packets as well.
I have a hack to the bridge, which sortof adapts to this. Ping me sunday, when I have some more time...
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2013-02-26 21:24, Clem Cole wrote:
That sounds right. I've forgotten many of these details.
IIRC: DEC had something called "regions" that were bastardized by the
screen handlers like termcap et al to do some of the same things.
Horton (termcap and terminfo author) or Kent (terminal firmware author)
might remember.
Yeah. You can use the scroll region to do insert/delete lines. However, there is no help for insert/delete character. You just have to send it all on a VT100.
Johnny
Clem
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se
<mailto:bqt at softjar.se>> wrote:
As far as I know, the VT100 do not do insert and delete at all.
Those were added in the VT102...
That sounds right. I've forgotten many of these details.
IIRC: DEC had something called "regions" that were bastardized by the screen handlers like termcap et al to do some of the same things. Horton (termcap and terminfo author) or Kent (terminal firmware author) might remember.
Clem
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
As far as I know, the VT100 do not do insert and delete at all. Those were added in the VT102...
