Yes :-)
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On Feb 28, 2013, at 1:08 AM, Dan B <dibi58 at gmail.com> wrote:
grand s-100 bus
On 2/27/13, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
Dave you noted that the repository that one of us has discovered also
contains CP/M 80 materials. Would you be surprised that the Cromemco
which ended its operations in the US sometime ago, does exist as a
European company?
I have an interest in those contraptions, in that when they first
started being made available, they triggered most of my interests in
the technology.
If you're further curious feel free to write off list regarding them
things, and the Space Shuttle.......
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
grand s-100 bus
On 2/27/13, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
Dave you noted that the repository that one of us has discovered also
contains CP/M 80 materials. Would you be surprised that the Cromemco
which ended its operations in the US sometime ago, does exist as a
European company?
I have an interest in those contraptions, in that when they first
started being made available, they triggered most of my interests in
the technology.
If you're further curious feel free to write off list regarding them
things, and the Space Shuttle.......
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
Hello!
Dave you noted that the repository that one of us has discovered also
contains CP/M 80 materials. Would you be surprised that the Cromemco
which ended its operations in the US sometime ago, does exist as a
European company?
I have an interest in those contraptions, in that when they first
started being made available, they triggered most of my interests in
the technology.
If you're further curious feel free to write off list regarding them
things, and the Space Shuttle.......
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On 2/27/2013 4:27 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:26, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 4:25 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:24, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 4:18 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
I almost sent a 3560G to Ian. It can do IP routing. It can do GRE tunnels.
It can't do DECnet. :(
But can it do FDDI? ;)
Seeing as it's a fixed port switch..... no. :)
Booooring. ;)
It was only ever meant for one thing. :)
-brian
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:26, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 4:25 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:24, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 4:18 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
I almost sent a 3560G to Ian. It can do IP routing. It can do GRE tunnels.
It can't do DECnet. :(
But can it do FDDI? ;)
Seeing as it's a fixed port switch..... no. :)
Booooring. ;)
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:25 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:24, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 4:18 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
I almost sent a 3560G to Ian. It can do IP routing. It can do GRE tunnels.
It can't do DECnet. :(
But can it do FDDI? ;)
Seeing as it's a fixed port switch..... no. :)
-brian
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:24, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 4:18 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
I almost sent a 3560G to Ian. It can do IP routing. It can do GRE tunnels.
It can't do DECnet. :(
But can it do FDDI? ;)
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:18 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
I almost sent a 3560G to Ian. It can do IP routing. It can do GRE tunnels.
It can't do DECnet. :(
-brian
I watch the tunnel statuses here:
http://monitor.platinum.net/hecnet/
Ian
On 2013-02-27, at 1:18 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:16, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
That would explain why I can't push a config to you. :)
Yup. ;)
It's still running, just not in the correct subnet.
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:15 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:13, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Or you can go the dynamips/GNS3 route like Cory did.
Which will be back up once my network migration is complete. I'm in the middle of moving things to a big Sun and moving to a /16 internally instead of a /24 for administrative reasons.
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:12 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Excellent work! I think this tool is a great asset to HECnet. We just need a bit of promotion now. People are scared of Cisco equipment, but you can pick up a low-end router for $50 on ebay and it gives you everything you need to connect to HECnet.
Ian
On 2013-02-27, at 12:29 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 3:25 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 02/27/2013 03:10 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
The tunnel now does everything in the TODO exact that last one about
only sending configs out to only those who need them.
It now supports:
SNMP is now handled directly in python so no calling external scripts.
This allows for much better control over what happens when a router
doesn't respond.
IPSec tunnels as well as GRE tunnels (well, kinda, I still need to get a
working cisco config snippet to use, haven't done that yet)
mesh/hub/spoke topology. Each endpoint (router) can be designated one of
either hub, mesh or spoke. A spoke will only connect to a hub. hubs and
mesh will all connect to each other.
That's a damn fine piece of work!
Thank you! It's been a blast to write.
Much love to Paul for his python assistance. :)
-brian
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=6C0106D8811C11E28…
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=34324FD0812311E2B…
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:16, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
That would explain why I can't push a config to you. :)
Yup. ;)
It's still running, just not in the correct subnet.
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:15 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:13, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Or you can go the dynamips/GNS3 route like Cory did.
Which will be back up once my network migration is complete. I'm in the middle of moving things to a big Sun and moving to a /16 internally instead of a /24 for administrative reasons.
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:12 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Excellent work! I think this tool is a great asset to HECnet. We just need a bit of promotion now. People are scared of Cisco equipment, but you can pick up a low-end router for $50 on ebay and it gives you everything you need to connect to HECnet.
Ian
On 2013-02-27, at 12:29 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 3:25 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 02/27/2013 03:10 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
The tunnel now does everything in the TODO exact that last one about
only sending configs out to only those who need them.
It now supports:
SNMP is now handled directly in python so no calling external scripts.
This allows for much better control over what happens when a router
doesn't respond.
IPSec tunnels as well as GRE tunnels (well, kinda, I still need to get a
working cisco config snippet to use, haven't done that yet)
mesh/hub/spoke topology. Each endpoint (router) can be designated one of
either hub, mesh or spoke. A spoke will only connect to a hub. hubs and
mesh will all connect to each other.
That's a damn fine piece of work!
Thank you! It's been a blast to write.
Much love to Paul for his python assistance. :)
-brian
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=6C0106D8811C11E28…
