On 2013-05-08, at 3:55 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
26 areas online. Longest distance from MIM is 5 hops, for two areas.
And things are working pretty ok and stable. :-)
Great. Now things are going to break all over the place. First rule of Network Stability Club - Don't talk about Network Stability.
:)
Ian
On 2013-05-09 00:52, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-05-08 23:55, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Dennis Boone wrote:
> Isn't ROUTING IV level 2 router? EXEC TYPE is defined as that...or it
> should be anyway.
Yeah, Cory wants Area IV.
Okay. I got him connected now.
Excellent.
It seems there are already nodes defined for area 32. Was it previously
assigned to someone?
Uh? I don't have any nodes in area 32. Where did you get those?
Also, Please set 32.1 to "FDR", Johnny!
Done.
Pretty nice, by the way. Right now on MIM::
.ncp sho act area stat
Active areas status as of 9-MAY-13 00:53:09
Next
Area State Cost Hops Circuit Node
1 Reachable 1.13 (MIM)
2 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 2.1 (LEGATO)
3 Reachable 4 2 UNA-0 19.41 (SG1)
5 Reachable 11 3 UNA-0 14.1 (SKNLIN)
6 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 6.1 (STAR69)
7 Reachable 5 2 UNA-0 19.41 (SG1)
8 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 8.400 (GORVAX)
9 Reachable 23 2 UNA-0 42.1022 (HUB)
11 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 11.2 (MAISA)
12 Reachable 31 5 UNA-0 14.1 (SKNLIN)
14 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 14.1 (SKNLIN)
18 Reachable 4 2 UNA-0 19.41 (SG1)
19 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 19.41 (SG1)
20 Reachable 4 2 UNA-0 19.41 (SG1)
28 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 28.41 (RULLFS)
32 Reachable 34 4 UNA-0 42.1022 (HUB)
33 Reachable 4 2 UNA-0 19.41 (SG1)
39 Reachable 4 2 UNA-0 19.41 (SG1)
42 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 42.1022 (HUB)
44 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 44.1023 (A44RTR)
47 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 47.556 (KUHAVX)
51 Reachable 13 5 UNA-0 14.1 (SKNLIN)
52 Reachable 23 2 UNA-0 42.1022 (HUB)
59 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 59.11 (DIMMA)
61 Reachable 13 2 UNA-0 59.11 (DIMMA)
62 Reachable 3 1 UNA-0 62.637 (CTAKAH)
26 areas online. Longest distance from MIM is 5 hops, for two areas.
And things are working pretty ok and stable. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2013-05-08 23:55, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Dennis Boone wrote:
> Isn't ROUTING IV level 2 router? EXEC TYPE is defined as that...or it
> should be anyway.
Yeah, Cory wants Area IV.
Okay. I got him connected now.
Excellent.
It seems there are already nodes defined for area 32. Was it previously
assigned to someone?
Uh? I don't have any nodes in area 32. Where did you get those?
Also, Please set 32.1 to "FDR", Johnny!
Done.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
I think I figured it out. The DECnet/Linux code is in dnprogs, file
multinet.c
... the multinet stuff hooks into the Ethernet machinery (via a tun/tap
port).
This just begs the question - can I run multinet.c as a stand alone
program? Suppose I had a Linux machine, ran simh, connected the virtual
QNA/UNA to a tun/tap device, connected multinet.c to the same device, could
I then talk to a remote VMS node?
Quite a hack, but it might be useful ...
Bob
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Dennis Boone wrote:
> Isn't ROUTING IV level 2 router? EXEC TYPE is defined as that...or it
> should be anyway.
Yeah, Cory wants Area IV.
Okay. I got him connected now.
It seems there are already nodes defined for area 32. Was it previously assigned to someone?
Also, Please set 32.1 to "FDR", Johnny!
De
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Experiments
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Paul_Koning wrote:
On May 8, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-05-08 03:36, Connor Youngquist wrote:
Hello,
I would like to request area 32 for my usage. I've been watching HECnet
for a while now, and I'm ready to jump in and start learning. Cory has
mentioned that he will assist me in setting up the proper connections.
So noted.
Johnny
I've almost got him connected...but!
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 8-MAY-2013 17:29:29.93 %%%%%%%%%%%
Message from user DECNET on GEWT
DECnet event 4.19, adjacency down, operator initiated
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Paul_Koning wrote:
On May 8, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-05-08 03:36, Connor Youngquist wrote:
Hello,
I would like to request area 32 for my usage. I've been watching HECnet
for a while now, and I'm ready to jump in and start learning. Cory has
mentioned that he will assist me in setting up the proper connections.
So noted.
Johnny
I've almost got him connected...but!
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 8-MAY-2013 17:29:29.93 %%%%%%%%%%%
Message from user DECNET on GEWT
DECnet event 4.19, adjacency down, operator initiated
On May 8, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-05-08 03:36, Connor Youngquist wrote:
Hello,
I would like to request area 32 for my usage. I've been watching HECnet
for a while now, and I'm ready to jump in and start learning. Cory has
mentioned that he will assist me in setting up the proper connections.
So noted.
Johnny
I've almost got him connected...but!
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 8-MAY-2013 17:29:29.93 %%%%%%%%%%%
Message from user DECNET on GEWT
DECnet event 4.19, adjacency down, operator initiated
On Wed, 8 May 2013, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2013-05-08 03:36, Connor Youngquist wrote:
Hello,
I would like to request area 32 for my usage. I've been watching HECnet
for a while now, and I'm ready to jump in and start learning. Cory has
mentioned that he will assist me in setting up the proper connections.
So noted.
Johnny
I've almost got him connected...but!
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 8-MAY-2013 17:29:29.93 %%%%%%%%%%%
Message from user DECNET on GEWT
DECnet event 4.19, adjacency down, operator initiated
