On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm
<Mark at infocomm.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Mark Pizzolato wrote:
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Sampsa Laine write:
This looks cool, anyone try it?
http://www.9track.net/simh/video/
Hi Sampsa,
How timely of you to observe this today.
Just last night I got code pieces from Matt Burke (the guy at 9track.net) to
add VCB01 (QVSS) support to the simh codebase for the MicroVAX I and
MicroVAX II simulators.
I'm in the process of merging that code and adding the necessary build
mechanisms to the makefile as we speak.
This will be cleaned up and visible at https://github.com/simh/simh in at
most a couple of days....
For folks who build their own binaries, the latest github code has a VAXStation I and VAXStation II with the MonoChrome QVSS video capabilities.
sim> SET CPU MODEL=VAXSTATION
enables the video subsystem.
The VAXStation I has a limit of 4MB of RAM, the VAXStation II has a limit of 16MB.
The makefile should just build the right thing if the development support for libSDL is installed on your platform.
Please provide bug reports and/or other feedback with issues created at https://github.com/simh/simh/issues
There is a glitch in my scripts which build and package the windows binaries which is failing to build the simulators with video support, so folks who count on the Windows Binaries will have to wait until I fix this.
Thanks.
- Mark Pizzolato
Hello!
Nice to know Mark. Any suggestions for implementing it on a Raspberry
Pi system w/ 512MB of memory? I did get the code outside of your
screen idea to build properly.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Mark Pizzolato wrote:
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Sampsa Laine write:
This looks cool, anyone try it?
http://www.9track.net/simh/video/
Hi Sampsa,
How timely of you to observe this today.
Just last night I got code pieces from Matt Burke (the guy at 9track.net) to
add VCB01 (QVSS) support to the simh codebase for the MicroVAX I and
MicroVAX II simulators.
I'm in the process of merging that code and adding the necessary build
mechanisms to the makefile as we speak.
This will be cleaned up and visible at https://github.com/simh/simh in at
most a couple of days....
For folks who build their own binaries, the latest github code has a VAXStation I and VAXStation II with the MonoChrome QVSS video capabilities.
sim> SET CPU MODEL=VAXSTATION
enables the video subsystem.
The VAXStation I has a limit of 4MB of RAM, the VAXStation II has a limit of 16MB.
The makefile should just build the right thing if the development support for libSDL is installed on your platform.
Please provide bug reports and/or other feedback with issues created at https://github.com/simh/simh/issues
There is a glitch in my scripts which build and package the windows binaries which is failing to build the simulators with video support, so folks who count on the Windows Binaries will have to wait until I fix this.
Thanks.
- Mark Pizzolato
--
DECtec mailing list
http://dectec.info
To unsubscribe from this list see page at: http://dectec.info/mailman/listinfo/dectec_dectec.info
On 06/13/2013 06:45 AM, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
El 13/06/2013, a les 12:37, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> va escriure:
Like Tim said, cisco hardware is cheap bit you can use dynamips and run an emulated cisco.
That is interesting. But AFAIK you must own the real thing to get the IOS images to run it...
One doesn't need the real thing to obtain said images from my network. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
The one I wrote is indeed user mode. It runs on Windows and Linux (tested on Debian on Raspberry Pi, others have run it on FreeBSD and possibly other flavours of Unix but I don t know for sure).
Regards
Rob
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Cory Smelosky Sent: 13 June 2013 19:22 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] Losing my fixed IP
On 13 Jun 2013, at 06:27, "Mark Benson" <md.benson at gmail.com> wrote:
Multinet flatout refuses to work for me. I've tried repeatedly to Steve and Sapsa's networks and it just falls over after a few minutes. Cisco option presumably involves owning and running a suitable Cisco router?
You can do dynamips.
Rob's router is the user level one for Linux, right?
Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Multinet to Steve, Cisco to the GRE mesh or Rob's router. I believe those are your only three choices at the moment. -brian
On Jun 13, 2013, at 2:23, Mark Benson <md.benson at gmail.com> wrote:
Due to the limits on our ability to get internet service of any decent speed, we're having to change packages meaning we will lose out fixed IP in November. I'd like to work towards being able to stay on HECnet before then using STAR69 to maintain my connection.
I have had a couple of people make suggestions about how to, but it was a while ago and my brain's fogged over since then ;)
-- Mark Benson http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
-- Mark Benson
On 13 Jun 2013, at 06:27, "Mark Benson" <md.benson at gmail.com> wrote:
Multinet flatout refuses to work for me. I've tried repeatedly to Steve and Sapsa's networks and it just falls over after a few minutes.
Cisco option presumably involves owning and running a suitable Cisco router?
You can do dynamips.
Rob's router is the user level one for Linux, right?
Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Multinet to Steve, Cisco to the GRE mesh or Rob's router. I believe those are your only three choices at the moment.
-brian
On Jun 13, 2013, at 2:23, Mark Benson <md.benson at gmail.com> wrote:
Due to the limits on our ability to get internet service of any decent speed, we're having to change packages meaning we will lose out fixed IP in November. I'd like to work towards being able to stay on HECnet before then using STAR69 to maintain my connection.
I have had a couple of people make suggestions about how to, but it was a while ago and my brain's fogged over since then ;)
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
--
Mark Benson
or What I know about DECnet-11 (several things, undoubtedly :-)
I have a DECnet-11 RSX-11M (no + !) system, LENTO. On LENTO I can say
>NFT LEGATO::/LI [LEGATO is a VMS node]
and I get a directory of the default DECnet account on LEGATO - exactly what I d expect to happen. But if I say
>NFT MIM::DU:[4,54]/LI [MIM being an RSX node]
I get
NFT -- Error in reading directory MIM::DU:[4,54]
Access control rejected
On VMS this behavior is controlled by the SET EXECUTOR DEFAULT ACCESS characteristic, but DECnet-11 doesn t seem to have an equivalent. What s the secret to making this work on RSX?
Thanks,
Bob
I just realised HILANT (my VAX cluster) has no security journal.
I tried to create one with SET AUDIT/SERVER=NEW, but no file was created.
What's going on?
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +961 788 10537
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 01:05:46PM +0200, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Al 13/06/13 12:47, En/na Brian Hechinger ha escrit:
Huh?
-brian
I mean, you can't download an IOS image for the virtual CISCO unless you
have a customer id.
You can't download an IOS image for a physical Cisco unless you have a
customer id and current support contract.
There are other ways to getting IOS images. :)
-brian