HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

15562 discussions

[DECtec] [HECnet] RE: Slight OT: SIMH Framebuffer support

by e.olofsen＠xs4all.nl

Hi Mark, I just tried the updated code for the QVSS display, for which there were issues with the mouse. The network boot setup that I had to boot a real VAXStation with VMS 5.5-2, already worked with the microvax2, and now indeed the mouse works too in DECWindows! Thank you! Erik On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 09:41:05PM -0700, Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm wrote: Hi Erik, Thanks for giving this a try. No extra configuration steps should be necessary. Please create an issue at: https://github.com/simh/simh/issues and outline your problem. Include the output of SHOW VERSION from within the simulator. - Mark On Saturday, June 15, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Erik Olofsen wrote: Hi Mark and others trying QVSS support, Compiling a microvax2 with the QVSS display under Ubuntu on a laptop was successful. Booting an image for my VAXStation 3100 with device XQA0 was also successful and it was possible to login at the DECWindows login screen and the usual windows appeared - great!!! Unfortunately, the mouse does not work (moving and clicking), although with ctrl-right-shift the mouse releases. This is not really an issue with the QVSS display, and it could be because I used a VAXStation 3100 image; but should a mouse be configured in simh's initialization file? Erik On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:07:46PM -0700, Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm wrote: On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Mark Pizzolato wrote: On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Sampsa Laine write: This looks cool, anyone try it? http://www.9track.net/simh/video/ Hi Sampsa, How timely of you to observe this today. Just last night I got code pieces from Matt Burke (the guy at 9track.net) to add VCB01 (QVSS) support to the simh codebase for the MicroVAX I and MicroVAX II simulators. I'm in the process of merging that code and adding the necessary build mechanisms to the makefile as we speak. This will be cleaned up and visible at https://github.com/simh/simh in at most a couple of days.... For folks who build their own binaries, the latest github code has a VAXStation I and VAXStation II with the MonoChrome QVSS video capabilities. sim> SET CPU MODEL=VAXSTATION enables the video subsystem. The VAXStation I has a limit of 4MB of RAM, the VAXStation II has a limit of 16MB. The makefile should just build the right thing if the development support for libSDL is installed on your platform. Please provide bug reports and/or other feedback with issues created at https://github.com/simh/simh/issues There is a glitch in my scripts which build and package the windows binaries which is failing to build the simulators with video support, so folks who count on the Windows Binaries will have to wait until I fix this. Thanks. - Mark Pizzolato -- DECtec mailing list http://dectec.info To unsubscribe from this list see page at: http://dectec.info/mailman/listinfo/dectec_dectec.info -- DECtec mailing list http://dectec.info To unsubscribe from this list see page at: http://dectec.info/mailman/listinfo/dectec_dectec.info -- DECtec mailing list http://dectec.info To unsubscribe from this list see page at: http://dectec.info/mailman/listinfo/dectec_dectec.info

11 years, 10 months

SG1 down?

by jeep＠scshome.net

SG1:: has a new Multinet License and should be back up shortly. -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Steve Davidson Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:46 PM To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: RE: [HECnet] SG1 down? SG1:: had crashed do to power issues. When it returned the Multinet License had expired. I have requested a new license. I will install the new license as soon as I get it. I *WILL* put the new license expiration date in my calendar. Sorry about that! -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Jordi Guillaumes i Pons Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:17 AM To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: [HECnet] SG1 down? Hello, I have had a network mishap at home (basically, my ISP convinced me to upgrade my router firmware...) and I have had to rebuild my NAT tables from scratch. Now I see I can't connect to neither SG1 nor GORVAX, which are the sites I used to link thru using the multinet gateway. I see I can SET HOST to GORVAX (but I somehow remember its multinet gateway has been down for some time), but I can't SETHOST nor TELNET to SG1. For the time being I'm using Johhny's bridge to hook up to Hecnet (thanks Johhny for not deleting my entry :)), but I'd like to get back the multinet link. Is that a holiday related downtime, or my setup is really screwed? (I'm NATTing port 700 UDP to my VAX... I think that was all I had to do to use the Multinet stuff...). Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

11 years, 10 months

SG1 down?

by jeep＠scshome.net

SG1:: had crashed do to power issues. When it returned the Multinet License had expired. I have requested a new license. I will install the new license as soon as I get it. I *WILL* put the new license expiration date in my calendar. Sorry about that! -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Jordi Guillaumes i Pons Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:17 AM To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: [HECnet] SG1 down? Hello, I have had a network mishap at home (basically, my ISP convinced me to upgrade my router firmware...) and I have had to rebuild my NAT tables from scratch. Now I see I can't connect to neither SG1 nor GORVAX, which are the sites I used to link thru using the multinet gateway. I see I can SET HOST to GORVAX (but I somehow remember its multinet gateway has been down for some time), but I can't SETHOST nor TELNET to SG1. For the time being I'm using Johhny's bridge to hook up to Hecnet (thanks Johhny for not deleting my entry :)), but I'd like to get back the multinet link. Is that a holiday related downtime, or my setup is really screwed? (I'm NATTing port 700 UDP to my VAX... I think that was all I had to do to use the Multinet stuff...). Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

11 years, 10 months

SG1 down?

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-08-16 02:18, Michael Holmes wrote: I think SG1 is down or not routing or either Steve's network is down. :( He's my only route to HECNET, so I'm patiently waiting for SG1 to come back online :( Maybe find a second route into HECnet? Johnny Sent from my iPhone On Aug 15, 2013, at 7:33 AM, "Sampsa Laine" <sampsa at mac.com> wrote: GORVAX isn't running MULTINET anymore, sorry, had to rebuild it. sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +358 40 7208932 On 15 Aug 2013, at 13:17, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> wrote: Hello, I have had a network mishap at home (basically, my ISP convinced me to upgrade my router firmware...) and I have had to rebuild my NAT tables from scratch. Now I see I can't connect to neither SG1 nor GORVAX, which are the sites I used to link thru using the multinet gateway. I see I can SET HOST to GORVAX (but I somehow remember its multinet gateway has been down for some time), but I can't SETHOST nor TELNET to SG1. For the time being I'm using Johhny's bridge to hook up to Hecnet (thanks Johhny for not deleting my entry :)), but I'd like to get back the multinet link. Is that a holiday related downtime, or my setup is really screwed? (I'm NATTing port 700 UDP to my VAX... I think that was all I had to do to use the Multinet stuff...). Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

11 years, 10 months

SG1 down?

by mholmes10＠hotmail.com

I think SG1 is down or not routing or either Steve's network is down. :( He's my only route to HECNET, so I'm patiently waiting for SG1 to come back online :( Sent from my iPhone On Aug 15, 2013, at 7:33 AM, "Sampsa Laine" <sampsa at mac.com> wrote: GORVAX isn't running MULTINET anymore, sorry, had to rebuild it. sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +358 40 7208932 On 15 Aug 2013, at 13:17, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> wrote: Hello, I have had a network mishap at home (basically, my ISP convinced me to upgrade my router firmware...) and I have had to rebuild my NAT tables from scratch. Now I see I can't connect to neither SG1 nor GORVAX, which are the sites I used to link thru using the multinet gateway. I see I can SET HOST to GORVAX (but I somehow remember its multinet gateway has been down for some time), but I can't SETHOST nor TELNET to SG1. For the time being I'm using Johhny's bridge to hook up to Hecnet (thanks Johhny for not deleting my entry :)), but I'd like to get back the multinet link. Is that a holiday related downtime, or my setup is really screwed? (I'm NATTing port 700 UDP to my VAX... I think that was all I had to do to use the Multinet stuff...). Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

11 years, 10 months

SG1 down?

by sampsa＠mac.com

GORVAX isn't running MULTINET anymore, sorry, had to rebuild it. sampsa <sampsa at mac.com> mobile +358 40 7208932 On 15 Aug 2013, at 13:17, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> wrote: Hello, I have had a network mishap at home (basically, my ISP convinced me to upgrade my router firmware...) and I have had to rebuild my NAT tables from scratch. Now I see I can't connect to neither SG1 nor GORVAX, which are the sites I used to link thru using the multinet gateway. I see I can SET HOST to GORVAX (but I somehow remember its multinet gateway has been down for some time), but I can't SETHOST nor TELNET to SG1. For the time being I'm using Johhny's bridge to hook up to Hecnet (thanks Johhny for not deleting my entry :)), but I'd like to get back the multinet link. Is that a holiday related downtime, or my setup is really screwed? (I'm NATTing port 700 UDP to my VAX... I think that was all I had to do to use the Multinet stuff...). Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

11 years, 10 months

SG1 down?

by jg＠jordi.guillaumes.name

Hello, I have had a network mishap at home (basically, my ISP convinced me to upgrade my router firmware...) and I have had to rebuild my NAT tables from scratch. Now I see I can't connect to neither SG1 nor GORVAX, which are the sites I used to link thru using the multinet gateway. I see I can SET HOST to GORVAX (but I somehow remember its multinet gateway has been down for some time), but I can't SETHOST nor TELNET to SG1. For the time being I'm using Johhny's bridge to hook up to Hecnet (thanks Johhny for not deleting my entry :)), but I'd like to get back the multinet link. Is that a holiday related downtime, or my setup is really screwed? (I'm NATTing port 700 UDP to my VAX... I think that was all I had to do to use the Multinet stuff...). Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

11 years, 10 months

Cisco Catalyst family members

by b4＠gewt.net

On 7 Aug 2013, at 20:18, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote: On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 7 Aug 2013, at 19:50, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote: On 08/07/2013 07:47 PM, Gregg Levine wrote: Here's a stretch, a shop in California named WeirdStuff is selling a Cisco Catalyst 2948G for 35 dollars. Obviously that prices does not include S&H costs. They go onto discuss what else the thing has, such as - Layer 3 Switch - 48 Ports 10/100 - 2 GBIC Ports for Gigabit uplink. I believe that is a good description. But I'm no judge of prices. Someone here made the mistake of throwing out a batch of Cisco gear items and I rescued them before the local vulture union could destroy them. New I believe they are worth more then some of the cars people drive here. One was a Catalyst 2900, and the other was a Catalyst 2960G, (with the optical delivery items for fiber-optics), and still another was a 2500, (which is a classic amongst that family I believe.), and then a 3600, the other happened to be a 2550 series unit. How hard is it to identify them and confirm what I rescued? Quite easy. 2500s are ancient, but still very useful. 2900s, not so much. 3600s still go for more serious money; if they threw them in the trash, they're idiots. 2550s also fetch some money. Just check the fans in the 2500s. Remember how MINE died! I can help you go through their hardware configurations and such, crack passwords for access, etc etc when the time comes. I can too, but I m not too familiar with Layer 3 switches. I d love one to play with though. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA Hello! Okay Cory how quickly can you get here, and remember to bring everything you need, and everything you don t. Not very quickly if you don t have automated cable-installing robots and terminal servers. ;) Seriously though I've seen these items, ah, mentioned on Amazon whilst searching for items that wear an AUI port, and even an entire rack of gear was shown. Gotta love AUI gear. ----- Now why are the yetis now setting up tents and arranging for catering services for a long term stay? Needed the cash. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."

11 years, 11 months

Cisco Catalyst family members

by gregg.drwho8＠gmail.com

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 7 Aug 2013, at 19:50, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote: On 08/07/2013 07:47 PM, Gregg Levine wrote: Here's a stretch, a shop in California named WeirdStuff is selling a Cisco Catalyst 2948G for 35 dollars. Obviously that prices does not include S&H costs. They go onto discuss what else the thing has, such as - Layer 3 Switch - 48 Ports 10/100 - 2 GBIC Ports for Gigabit uplink. I believe that is a good description. But I'm no judge of prices. Someone here made the mistake of throwing out a batch of Cisco gear items and I rescued them before the local vulture union could destroy them. New I believe they are worth more then some of the cars people drive here. One was a Catalyst 2900, and the other was a Catalyst 2960G, (with the optical delivery items for fiber-optics), and still another was a 2500, (which is a classic amongst that family I believe.), and then a 3600, the other happened to be a 2550 series unit. How hard is it to identify them and confirm what I rescued? Quite easy. 2500s are ancient, but still very useful. 2900s, not so much. 3600s still go for more serious money; if they threw them in the trash, they're idiots. 2550s also fetch some money. Just check the fans in the 2500s. Remember how MINE died! I can help you go through their hardware configurations and such, crack passwords for access, etc etc when the time comes. I can too, but I m not too familiar with Layer 3 switches. I d love one to play with though. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA Hello! Okay Cory how quickly can you get here, and remember to bring everything you need, and everything you don't. Seriously though I've seen these items, ah, mentioned on Amazon whilst searching for items that wear an AUI port, and even an entire rack of gear was shown. ----- Now why are the yetis now setting up tents and arranging for catering services for a long term stay? ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."

11 years, 11 months

Cisco Catalyst family members

by b4＠gewt.net

On 7 Aug 2013, at 19:50, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote: On 08/07/2013 07:47 PM, Gregg Levine wrote: Here's a stretch, a shop in California named WeirdStuff is selling a Cisco Catalyst 2948G for 35 dollars. Obviously that prices does not include S&H costs. They go onto discuss what else the thing has, such as - Layer 3 Switch - 48 Ports 10/100 - 2 GBIC Ports for Gigabit uplink. I believe that is a good description. But I'm no judge of prices. Someone here made the mistake of throwing out a batch of Cisco gear items and I rescued them before the local vulture union could destroy them. New I believe they are worth more then some of the cars people drive here. One was a Catalyst 2900, and the other was a Catalyst 2960G, (with the optical delivery items for fiber-optics), and still another was a 2500, (which is a classic amongst that family I believe.), and then a 3600, the other happened to be a 2550 series unit. How hard is it to identify them and confirm what I rescued? Quite easy. 2500s are ancient, but still very useful. 2900s, not so much. 3600s still go for more serious money; if they threw them in the trash, they're idiots. 2550s also fetch some money. Just check the fans in the 2500s. Remember how MINE died! I can help you go through their hardware configurations and such, crack passwords for access, etc etc when the time comes. I can too, but I m not too familiar with Layer 3 switches. I d love one to play with though. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

11 years, 11 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet