Is the smarthost relay taking non-authenticated mail on the SMTP port (not submission port)?
--
d|i|g|i|t|a|l had it THEN. Don't you wish you could still buy it now!
pechter-at-gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Mark Abene wrote:
If all outgoing mail is now going through the smarthost, then it's correct.
You may also want to edit /etc/aliases and run "newaliases" to take
care of that "alias database out of date" message.
It's not going through the smarthost is the problem.
-Mark
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Mark Abene wrote:
If you're editing the sendmail.cf file directly, it's most likely "DS"
for smarthost. I don't recall if 4.3BSD was using some version of
sendmail 4 or 5.65, but if it understands "DS", you just say:
DSrelay.domain.com
# remaining names must be local
R$+ $#local$:$1 everything else
DSmercia.gimme-sympathy.org
root at madeline:/misc/tahor/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src: /usr/lib/sendmail
-bd -q30m
root at madeline:/misc/tahor/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src: mail -v b4 at gewt.net
test
EOT
Warning: alias database out of date
b4 at gewt.net... Connecting to mailer.gewt.net (smtp)...
No spaces, and restart sendmail. If that doesn't work, I can dig up
the proper m4 macro to edit a sendmail.mc and process it into
sendmail.cf.
On 01/20/2014 03:21 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Good idea. I've been running qmail for years on my BSD boxes. Set
yup
takes a bit but once stable it's pretty much operator less. Send me
questions off list and I'll try to answer if I can.
Thanks!
I'm mostly surprised it (mostly) builds without issue on 4.3BSD. I'm
fairly certain this is using the original BSD compiler, too.
root at madeline:/: /var/qmail/rc &
[1] 110
root at madeline:/:
root at madeline:/: dev = 0x906, ino = 195, fs = /usr
panic: ifree: freeing free inode
syncing disks... 24 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 giving up
dumping to dev 901, offset 34176
dump
Or not...
Run fsck that filesystem!
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 01/20/2014 03:21 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Good idea. I've been running qmail for years on my BSD boxes. Set
yup
takes a bit but once stable it's pretty much operator less. Send me
questions off list and I'll try to answer if I can.
Thanks!
I'm mostly surprised it (mostly) builds without issue on 4.3BSD. I'm
fairly certain this is using the original BSD compiler, too.
root at madeline:/: /var/qmail/rc &
[1] 110
root at madeline:/:
root at madeline:/: dev = 0x906, ino = 195, fs = /usr
panic: ifree: freeing free inode
syncing disks... 24 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 giving up
dumping to dev 901, offset 34176
dump
Or not...
Run fsck that filesystem!
That certainly solved it. ;)
Looks like it had been awhile since I completely fscked it.
-Dave
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Clem Cole wrote:
Good idea. I've been running qmail for years on my BSD boxes. Set yup
takes a bit but once stable it's pretty much operator less. Send me
questions off list and I'll try to answer if I can.
Thanks!
I'm mostly surprised it (mostly) builds without issue on 4.3BSD. I'm fairly certain this is using the original BSD compiler, too.
root at madeline:/: /var/qmail/rc &
[1] 110
root at madeline:/:
root at madeline:/: dev = 0x906, ino = 195, fs = /usr
panic: ifree: freeing free inode
syncing disks... 24 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 giving up
dumping to dev 901, offset 34176
dump
Or not...
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Clem Cole wrote:
Good idea. I've been running qmail for years on my BSD boxes. Set yup
takes a bit but once stable it's pretty much operator less. Send me
questions off list and I'll try to answer if I can.
Thanks!
I'm mostly surprised it (mostly) builds without issue on 4.3BSD. I'm fairly certain this is using the original BSD compiler, too.
Clem
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Okay, sendmail was being a bit touchy. I am currently trying to build
qmail. After patching install.c to take hardcoded directories using
chdir() instead if fchdir() it seems to progress a bit further.
(I have no idea what syntax for fchdir() it wants with this old C
compiler).
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 01/20/2014 02:45 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Okay, sendmail was being a bit touchy. I am currently trying to build
qmail. After patching install.c to take hardcoded directories using
chdir() instead if fchdir() it seems to progress a bit further.
(I have no idea what syntax for fchdir() it wants with this old C
compiler).
(coming in late on this thread)
Sendmail of the vintage you're working with is riddled with security
holes, but it's rock-solid as far as moving mail around. It's been
about a decade since I've run it, but one thing to keep in mind is that
you shouldn't really edit the .cf file directly, but use the .mc files
(IIRC) which are processed by m4 to generate the .cf file. One can get
Sendmail up and running pretty easily that way.
There's a reason it's not exposed to the public. ;)
I need it to send all email through frontgate/mercia for the sake of security. ;)
If you decide to keep hacking on it, I can probably help; I wrangled
Sendmail for many years in a large-scale ISP environment, but I'm pretty
rusty at it. I switched to Postfix around 2004 or so.
Don't blame you for switching. ;)
More modern sendmail seems to be a bit friendlier. The older ones are just difficult to convince they should smarthost.
-Dave
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Good idea. I've been running qmail for years on my BSD boxes. Set yup takes a bit but once stable it's pretty much operator less. Send me questions off list and I'll try to answer if I can.
Clem
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Okay, sendmail was being a bit touchy. I am currently trying to build qmail. After patching install.c to take hardcoded directories using chdir() instead if fchdir() it seems to progress a bit further.
(I have no idea what syntax for fchdir() it wants with this old C compiler).
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 01/20/2014 02:45 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Okay, sendmail was being a bit touchy. I am currently trying to build
qmail. After patching install.c to take hardcoded directories using
chdir() instead if fchdir() it seems to progress a bit further.
(I have no idea what syntax for fchdir() it wants with this old C
compiler).
(coming in late on this thread)
Sendmail of the vintage you're working with is riddled with security
holes, but it's rock-solid as far as moving mail around. It's been
about a decade since I've run it, but one thing to keep in mind is that
you shouldn't really edit the .cf file directly, but use the .mc files
(IIRC) which are processed by m4 to generate the .cf file. One can get
Sendmail up and running pretty easily that way.
If you decide to keep hacking on it, I can probably help; I wrangled
Sendmail for many years in a large-scale ISP environment, but I'm pretty
rusty at it. I switched to Postfix around 2004 or so.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Okay, sendmail was being a bit touchy. I am currently trying to build qmail. After patching install.c to take hardcoded directories using chdir() instead if fchdir() it seems to progress a bit further.
(I have no idea what syntax for fchdir() it wants with this old C compiler).
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Of course it is. Did anybody write some kind of catalog for DECnet?
Kindly,
Daniel S derstr m
Sent from my iPad
On 19 Jan 2014, at 8:57 pm, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Just out of interest, isn't archie an IP protocol/service?
I've been thinking we should maybe set up our own IP network as well (that you can VPN in to), I'll soon have the equipment + bandwidth to do this.
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +44 7961 149465
On 19 Jan 2014, at 00:29, Daniel Soderstrom <snaggs at mac.com> wrote:
Hi Gents, going to do a clean VMS install today and finally get my Vax onto HECnet. Once Im on I am going to turn off TCP/IP (wont have to worry about security attacks) and thought Id setup an archie server on there. Is there a VMS software repositary somewhere?
Kindly,
Daniel S derstr m
Sent from my iPad
