HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

7 participants
15565 discussions

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 06:53:05PM -0500, Cory Smelosky wrote: Hey Brian, Any progress on the scripts? Sorry guys, I've been swamped lately. I haven't had time to deal with it. tftp was giving me fits so I still need to look at that. I'll try to make time today but work/life is crazy right now. -brian

11 years, 4 months

Dynamic IP update?

by b4＠gewt.net

Hey Brian, Any progress on the scripts? -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 4 months

Fans for DS10/XP900

by fcoffey＠misernet.net

Hi ... With a spat of warm weather approaching I think it's time to refresh some fans in my XP900 system - one of them (front left, closest to the faceplate) was very noisy last evening so I shut things down and broke out the canned air for a cleaning. Now she's quiet for the moment. Looking at the normal sources for made-for-Alpha parts, a fan kit runs $250! Whoa. That's about what I paid for the XP900 and a bit steep for a hobbyist... :( Any specs where I could find out what type of fans they are and just purchase them from the local electronics wholesaler? Size, pins, etc. Thanks, Fred (who is hoping this isn't too offtopic since a good percentage of us here run DEC gear) :) ---- Lets call it for what it is - "legacy" is a term that people use in a polite but derogatory manner to imply that the future direction they prefer is not that which they view as the current direction.

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by bob＠jfcl.com

No, the letter suffix is a patch kit identification. So it means release 10.1, patch kit L. That's what I thought. Is patch kit L for 10.1 around anywhere? Thanks, Bob

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by Paul_Koning＠Dell.com

No, the letter suffix is a patch kit identification. So it means release 10.1, patch kit L. In the notation used by some other organizations, it would be V10.1.12. paul On Feb 17, 2014, at 8:57 PM, Steve Davidson <jeep at scshome.net> wrote: I am guessing the "Last" version. That is what it says... -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Bob Armstrong Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 20:44 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: RE: RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions RSTS/E 10.1L .... "L" ?? What's version 10.1L? Bob

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by jeep＠scshome.net

Good question! I have no idea. Paul K may know better. -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Bob Armstrong Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 21:07 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: RE: RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions I am guessing the "Last" version. That is what it says... Is this different from just RSTS 10.1? I'm just wondering if there's a later version than plain old 10.1. Thanks, Bob

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by bob＠jfcl.com

I am guessing the "Last" version. That is what it says... Is this different from just RSTS 10.1? I'm just wondering if there's a later version than plain old 10.1. Thanks, Bob

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by jeep＠scshome.net

I am guessing the "Last" version. That is what it says... -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Bob Armstrong Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 20:44 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: RE: RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions RSTS/E 10.1L .... "L" ?? What's version 10.1L? Bob

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by bob＠jfcl.com

RSTS/E 10.1L .... "L" ?? What's version 10.1L? Bob

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by jeep＠scshome.net

RSTS/E 10.1L will run nicely on a PDP-11/23+. I do it all the time. That is what PLUTO:: is. -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Cory Smelosky Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 21:22 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Dave McGuire wrote: On 02/16/2014 09:15 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: What're the requirements for RSTS/E 10.1? I think I managed to fit it in 40M very carefully in simh once... It will not fit on a single RL02, unfortunately. ;) I should get that UDA50, order a replacement drive, pickup the PSU and run it on the 11/44, then. ;) I'll find another solution for the 11/23+. The {11/03,11/23} can be RT-11 or RSX-11M+. It fits nicely on am RM02/RM03 (~70MB), with languages etc. I don't know what the strict requirements are for the OS itself, offhand. Ahh. -Dave -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 4 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet