HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

3 participants
15561 discussions

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by b4＠gewt.net

On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Dave McGuire wrote: On 02/17/2014 04:19 AM, Peter Lothberg wrote: In Croatia we put 1GE simple fiber SFP in to the houses. Could be upgraded to 10G when prices come down. No pon, no nothing strange... Houses in Croatia have orders of magnitude better connectivity than most commercial facilities in the US. That figures. Telecoms in Columbus, OH are fantastic, though. ;) ...Mind we manufactured switching equipment a short drive from where I live. -Dave -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by roll＠Stupi.SE

Even _I_ have a route to you! (With truly awful latency) b4 at meaghan:~ traceroute 192.108.198.254 traceroute to 192.108.198.254 (192.108.198.254), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets snip 18 r29a-ge-2-0-gw.stupi.net (192.108.195.149) 583.803 ms * 213.912 ms So you are looking at CPU speed of the router, that processes ping packets at the lowest priority.. Ping a computer, kniv.stupi.se for example.. R>!traceroute 75.49.19.254 traceroute to 75.49.19.254 (75.49.19.254), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 R29A-GW.Stupi.SE (192.108.198.254) 227.170 ms 215.521 ms 205.397 ms 2 R29BFR-GE-2-0-6-GW.Stupi.NET (192.108.195.150) 161.133 ms 0.261 ms 0.284 ms 3 BFR5-GE-5-1-0.Stupi.NET (192.108.195.17) 0.431 ms 0.273 ms 0.433 ms 4 HFR1-GE-0-7-1-0.Stupi.NET (192.108.195.122) 14.249 ms 10.423 ms 1.309 ms 5 213.206.129.86 (213.206.129.86) 0.578 ms 0.678 ms 0.432 ms 6 sl-bb21-cop-12-0-0.sprintlink.net (213.206.129.33) 9.351 ms 9.193 ms 9.131 ms 7 sl-bb20-cop-15-0-0.sprintlink.net (80.77.64.33) 9.937 ms 9.313 ms 9.207 ms 8 144.232.24.12 (144.232.24.12) 88.426 ms 315.822 ms 88.493 ms 9 sl-crs2-nyc-0-2-5-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.25.113) 91.615 ms 91.081 ms 90.863 ms 10 144.232.6.6 (144.232.6.6) 90.257 ms 90.185 ms 90.081 ms 11 cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.80.226) 118.263 ms 119.168 ms 116.009 ms 12 cr1.phlpa.ip.att.net (12.122.5.242) 116.323 ms 123.579 ms 119.665 ms 13 cr2.phlpa.ip.att.net (12.122.3.226) 119.224 ms 116.263 ms 115.926 ms 14 cr2.cl2oh.ip.att.net (12.122.2.209) 116.647 ms 119.276 ms 127.524 ms 15 cr1.cl2oh.ip.att.net (12.122.2.125) 117.425 ms 117.979 ms 115.837 ms 16 12.83.58.253 (12.83.58.253) 272.051 ms 298.390 ms 311.608 ms 17 ppp-151-164-55-57.eulstx.swbell.net (151.164.55.57) 217.446 ms 242.930 ms 291.844 ms 18 dist2-te2-1.wotnoh.sbcglobal.net (151.164.55.64) 115.333 ms 115.430 ms 115.239 ms 19 adsl-75-49-19-254.dsl.wotnoh.sbcglobal.net (75.49.19.254) 117.827 ms 117.474 ms 116.824 ms In Croatia we put 1GE simple fiber SFP in to the houses. Could be upgraded to 10G when prices come down. No pon, no nothing strange... -P

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by b4＠gewt.net

On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Peter Lothberg wrote: Even _I_ have a route to you! (With truly awful latency) b4 at meaghan:~ traceroute 192.108.198.254 traceroute to 192.108.198.254 (192.108.198.254), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets snip 18 r29a-ge-2-0-gw.stupi.net (192.108.195.149) 583.803 ms * 213.912 ms So you are looking at CPU speed of the router, that processes ping packets at the lowest priority.. Ping a computer, kniv.stupi.se for example.. Ahhhh right. kniv has much better latency. ;) 18 dist2-te2-1.wotnoh.sbcglobal.net (151.164.55.64) 115.333 ms 115.430 ms 115.239 ms 19 adsl-75-49-19-254.dsl.wotnoh.sbcglobal.net (75.49.19.254) 117.827 ms 117.474 ms 116.824 ms In Croatia we put 1GE simple fiber SFP in to the houses. Could be upgraded to 10G when prices come down. No pon, no nothing strange... I'd love that here. -P -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 02/16/2014 10:11 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: That's why I want a non-residential ISP to provide me with service. I don't think I'll get that here, though. :( Not at a price you can afford , no. :) Unless I convince OAR.net I am doing legitimate educational research in the field of computer history/aracheology, correct. ;) 3/3 symmetric T1 w/ 5 static IPs is $549/mo. Hmmmm. If by 3/3 you mean 3Mbps up and 3Mbps down, it's not a T1. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by b4＠gewt.net

On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Dave McGuire wrote: On 02/16/2014 10:11 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: That's why I want a non-residential ISP to provide me with service. I don't think I'll get that here, though. :( Not at a price you can afford , no. :) Unless I convince OAR.net I am doing legitimate educational research in the field of computer history/aracheology, correct. ;) 3/3 symmetric T1 w/ 5 static IPs is $549/mo. Hmmmm. If by 3/3 you mean 3Mbps up and 3Mbps down, it's not a T1. I know. They were just billing it as a T1...despite the fact it'd be two bonded T1s. -Dave -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by b4＠gewt.net

On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote: On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: That's why I want a non-residential ISP to provide me with service. I don't think I'll get that here, though. :( Not at a price you can afford , no. :) Unless I convince OAR.net I am doing legitimate educational research in the field of computer history/aracheology, correct. ;) 3/3 symmetric T1 w/ 5 static IPs is $549/mo. Hmmmm. -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 02/16/2014 10:02 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Comcast:: "You don't qualify to peer with us". What did you do to make Comcast mad at you? Their view of the future is that they talk to themself, facebook, google and apple. I do not understand, but they are trying to reduce inbound capacty to themself as much as possible, thay have all the content you need on-net... That's why I want a non-residential ISP to provide me with service. I don't think I'll get that here, though. :( I have a non-residential ISP. I am on Comcast *business*. Non-throttled, unmetered bandwidth, excellent performance, excellent stability, static IP addresses (statically-allocated IP addresses...not just "my IP address hardly ever changes!" crap that a lot of people think means "static" these days), and the FIRST person that answers the phone can log into a DNS server and update PTR records for me. And Peter's network cannot reach my network. WTF? -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

On Feb 16, 2014, at 22:02, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Peter Lothberg wrote: Comcast:: "You don't qualify to peer with us". What did you do to make Comcast mad at you? Their view of the future is that they talk to themself, facebook, google and apple. I do not understand, but they are trying to reduce inbound capacty to themself as much as possible, thay have all the content you need on-net... That's why I want a non-residential ISP to provide me with service. I don't think I'll get that here, though. :( Not at a price you can afford , no. :)

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 02/17/2014 04:06 AM, Peter Lothberg wrote: Comcast:: "You don't qualify to peer with us". What did you do to make Comcast mad at you? Their view of the future is that they talk to themself, facebook, google and apple. I access machines all over the world, all day, every day. I honestly have yet to have problems elsewhere. US has a problem (self created..) We have MANY self-created problems. :-( -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

11 years, 4 months

RSTS/E tapes, was Re: [HECnet] two dumb RSX questions

by roll＠Stupi.SE

Comcast:: "You don't qualify to peer with us". What did you do to make Comcast mad at you? Their view of the future is that they talk to themself, facebook, google and apple. I do not understand, but they are trying to reduce inbound capacty to themself as much as possible, thay have all the content you need on-net... US has a problem (self created..) -P

11 years, 4 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet