Okay, I'm not finding a whole lot of documentation on this...
Can ZRQCH0 be used to format disks when the CSR isn't the default? Does it prompt for them during formatting? Will I have to shove my SCSI controller to a different address temporarily?
I have a worksheet detailing how to patch ZRQCH0 to format unsupported geometries so upon getting XXDP booted I can FINALLY use one of my drives...which will finally allow me to boot RT-11 on the 11/03 from an old CMI drive...if it even still works. ;)
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
El 22/05/2014, a les 9.27, Kari Uusim ki <uusimaki at exdecfinland.org> va escriure:
For the DECnet cluster alias you need (at least) one routing node (L1) or a router.
Does any of the cluster nodes have routing enabled?
I hqve a L1 router and an area router in the same LAN. Is that enough, or should I enable routing in one of the cluster members?
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
On Thu, 22 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
It's in a BA123 so I currently have a MicroPDPVAX 11/23 II
FYI: PDP-11s were also sold in BA123 configurations...
I wasn't aware PDP-11s were sold in BA123s! I had wondered if they were though.
But nice. So now the system is running as it should.
Yup. Save for the one fan that seems to be failing.
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
For the DECnet cluster alias you need (at least) one routing node (L1) or a router.
Does any of the cluster nodes have routing enabled?
Kari
On 22.5.2014 9:46, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
El 22/05/2014, a les 8.29, Kari Uusim ki <uusimaki at exdecfinland.org> va escriure:
I guess you have a DECnet router involved, but just asking.
Not really. All my machines (virtual and real) are in the same LAN, and they appear to be all adjacent (excepting the simulated KS10, which connects to one of the virtual VAXen via a KDP/DUP <-> DMC link).
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
.
El 22/05/2014, a les 8.29, Kari Uusim ki <uusimaki at exdecfinland.org> va escriure:
I guess you have a DECnet router involved, but just asking.
Not really. All my machines (virtual and real) are in the same LAN, and they appear to be all adjacent (excepting the simulated KS10, which connects to one of the virtual VAXen via a KDP/DUP <-> DMC link).
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
On 2014-05-22 05:15, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Everything I know about the Qbus tells me my bus shouldn't be
contiguous...but...
Processor Type: 11/23-PLUS Memory Size: 512. Kw
Options:
Extended Instruction Set (EIS)
Extended (22-Bit) Addressing
Parity Memory
Name Vector CSR Unit Type Remark
DUA 154 172150
0 RA82
1 RA82
2 RA82
3 RA82
MUB 330 160404
YLA 060 177560
YLB 300 176500
YLC 310 176510
YLD 320 176520
It's in a BA123 so I currently have a MicroPDPVAX 11/23 II
FYI: PDP-11s were also sold in BA123 configurations...
But nice. So now the system is running as it should.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
I guess you have a DECnet router involved, but just asking.
Kari
On 22.5.2014 0:26, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Hello,
I have built a simh based LAVC (just because it is cool), and I have a problem. The booting/sharing/clustering works as usual (that is, awesomly), but I can't make the decnet cluster alias work. I have defined it and if I do a show exec char I see it is defined. If I do a SET HOST to the cluster alias _FROM_ any node in the cluster, it also works (as SET HOST 0), but the address does not propagate thru the LAN, so it is not visible in SHOW NET/OLD and it is regarded as unreachable from any other node.
I have some real iron here, and there the cluster alias works as intended.
I wonder if it is a simh-related issue. I don't really know how does this thing work internally. Since DECNET has no ARP resolution I guess the MAC address corresponding to the DECNET address is somehow added to the NIC so it "listens" to both MAC addresses (the one corresponding to the node and the cluster one). Perhaps SIMH implementation does not allow this magic. If that was the case I'd consider it something to be fixed.
Any idea if I am missing something stupid before reporting this as a bug?
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
jg at jordi.guillaumes.name
HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES
.
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Dave McGuire wrote:
:-)
Only problem is: cooling for the HDD and teh fact it's 4.3 instead of 4.6.
On 05/21/2014 11:15 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
:-)
On 05/21/2014 11:15 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Everything I know about the Qbus tells me my bus shouldn't be
contiguous...but...
Processor Type: 11/23-PLUS Memory Size: 512. Kw
Options:
Extended Instruction Set (EIS)
Extended (22-Bit) Addressing
Parity Memory
Name Vector CSR Unit Type Remark
DUA 154 172150
0 RA82
1 RA82
2 RA82
3 RA82
MUB 330 160404
YLA 060 177560
YLB 300 176500
YLC 310 176510
YLD 320 176520
It's in a BA123 so I currently have a MicroPDPVAX 11/23 II
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Everything I know about the Qbus tells me my bus shouldn't be contiguous...but...
Processor Type: 11/23-PLUS Memory Size: 512. Kw
Options:
Extended Instruction Set (EIS)
Extended (22-Bit) Addressing
Parity Memory
Name Vector CSR Unit Type Remark
DUA 154 172150
0 RA82
1 RA82
2 RA82
3 RA82
MUB 330 160404
YLA 060 177560
YLB 300 176500
YLC 310 176510
YLD 320 176520
It's in a BA123 so I currently have a MicroPDPVAX 11/23 II
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
