HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

15562 discussions

by jg＠jordi.guillaumes.name

El 22/05/2014, a les 8.29, Kari Uusim ki <uusimaki at exdecfinland.org> va escriure: I guess you have a DECnet router involved, but just asking. Not really. All my machines (virtual and real) are in the same LAN, and they appear to be all adjacent (excepting the simulated KS10, which connects to one of the virtual VAXen via a KDP/DUP <-> DMC link). Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

11 years, 1 month

RSX-11 booted!

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2014-05-22 05:15, Cory Smelosky wrote: Everything I know about the Qbus tells me my bus shouldn't be contiguous...but... Processor Type: 11/23-PLUS Memory Size: 512. Kw Options: Extended Instruction Set (EIS) Extended (22-Bit) Addressing Parity Memory Name Vector CSR Unit Type Remark DUA 154 172150 0 RA82 1 RA82 2 RA82 3 RA82 MUB 330 160404 YLA 060 177560 YLB 300 176500 YLC 310 176510 YLD 320 176520 It's in a BA123 so I currently have a MicroPDPVAX 11/23 II FYI: PDP-11s were also sold in BA123 configurations... But nice. So now the system is running as it should. Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

11 years, 1 month

DECNET Cluster alias and simh

by uusimaki＠exdecfinland.org

I guess you have a DECnet router involved, but just asking. Kari On 22.5.2014 0:26, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote: Hello, I have built a simh based LAVC (just because it is cool), and I have a problem. The booting/sharing/clustering works as usual (that is, awesomly), but I can't make the decnet cluster alias work. I have defined it and if I do a show exec char I see it is defined. If I do a SET HOST to the cluster alias _FROM_ any node in the cluster, it also works (as SET HOST 0), but the address does not propagate thru the LAN, so it is not visible in SHOW NET/OLD and it is regarded as unreachable from any other node. I have some real iron here, and there the cluster alias works as intended. I wonder if it is a simh-related issue. I don't really know how does this thing work internally. Since DECNET has no ARP resolution I guess the MAC address corresponding to the DECNET address is somehow added to the NIC so it "listens" to both MAC addresses (the one corresponding to the node and the cluster one). Perhaps SIMH implementation does not allow this magic. If that was the case I'd consider it something to be fixed. Any idea if I am missing something stupid before reporting this as a bug? Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES .

11 years, 1 month

RSX-11 booted!

by b4＠gewt.net

On Wed, 21 May 2014, Dave McGuire wrote: :-) Only problem is: cooling for the HDD and teh fact it's 4.3 instead of 4.6. On 05/21/2014 11:15 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 1 month

RSX-11 booted!

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

:-) On 05/21/2014 11:15 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Everything I know about the Qbus tells me my bus shouldn't be contiguous...but... Processor Type: 11/23-PLUS Memory Size: 512. Kw Options: Extended Instruction Set (EIS) Extended (22-Bit) Addressing Parity Memory Name Vector CSR Unit Type Remark DUA 154 172150 0 RA82 1 RA82 2 RA82 3 RA82 MUB 330 160404 YLA 060 177560 YLB 300 176500 YLC 310 176510 YLD 320 176520 It's in a BA123 so I currently have a MicroPDPVAX 11/23 II -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

11 years, 1 month

RSX-11 booted!

by b4＠gewt.net

Everything I know about the Qbus tells me my bus shouldn't be contiguous...but... Processor Type: 11/23-PLUS Memory Size: 512. Kw Options: Extended Instruction Set (EIS) Extended (22-Bit) Addressing Parity Memory Name Vector CSR Unit Type Remark DUA 154 172150 0 RA82 1 RA82 2 RA82 3 RA82 MUB 330 160404 YLA 060 177560 YLB 300 176500 YLC 310 176510 YLD 320 176520 It's in a BA123 so I currently have a MicroPDPVAX 11/23 II -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 1 month

DECNET Cluster alias and simh

by jg＠jordi.guillaumes.name

Hello, I have built a simh based LAVC (just because it is cool), and I have a problem. The booting/sharing/clustering works as usual (that is, awesomly), but I can't make the decnet cluster alias work. I have defined it and if I do a show exec char I see it is defined. If I do a SET HOST to the cluster alias _FROM_ any node in the cluster, it also works (as SET HOST 0), but the address does not propagate thru the LAN, so it is not visible in SHOW NET/OLD and it is regarded as unreachable from any other node. I have some real iron here, and there the cluster alias works as intended. I wonder if it is a simh-related issue. I don't really know how does this thing work internally. Since DECNET has no ARP resolution I guess the MAC address corresponding to the DECNET address is somehow added to the NIC so it "listens" to both MAC addresses (the one corresponding to the node and the cluster one). Perhaps SIMH implementation does not allow this magic. If that was the case I'd consider it something to be fixed. Any idea if I am missing something stupid before reporting this as a bug? Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

11 years, 1 month

DEC Information Source

by Paul_Koning＠Dell.com

Interesting! I see 4 manuals for the DECmpp . That looks familiar, but I though that this was only a design circulating around DEC and not something that ever became a product. It looks like it did. Up to 16 processor cards with 1024 processors each. Neat. paul On May 21, 2014, at 1:44 PM, Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk> wrote: Came across this link: http://decdoc.itsx.net/dec94mds/

11 years, 1 month

Never seen one of these in the flesh before...

by uusimaki＠exdecfinland.org

Well, that was a decent price, but that won't last long. There are others as well, but at really different prices: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/251516666655?_trksid=p2055120.m1438.l2649&ssPageN… Kari On 21.5.2014 21:37, Mark Wickens wrote: On 21/05/2014 19:35, Kari Uusim ki wrote: They are horribly expensive - as they were as new. All the Solid state disks. That might explain why they are so rare. Kari On 21.5.2014 21:14, Mark Wickens wrote: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/DEC-Digital-Compaq-1-6GB-5-25-Wide-Ultra-SCSI-Sol… Blimey, when I sent the email it was $30! Mark.

11 years, 1 month

Never seen one of these in the flesh before...

by mark＠wickensonline.co.uk

On 21/05/2014 19:35, Kari Uusim ki wrote: They are horribly expensive - as they were as new. All the Solid state disks. That might explain why they are so rare. Kari On 21.5.2014 21:14, Mark Wickens wrote: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/DEC-Digital-Compaq-1-6GB-5-25-Wide-Ultra-SCSI-Sol… Blimey, when I sent the email it was $30! Mark. -- http://www.wickensonline.co.uk http://hecnet.eu http://declegacy.org.uk http://retrochallenge.net https://twitter.com/urbancamo

11 years, 1 month

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet