On Sat, 24 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Looks like rebuilding the tasks without FCSFSL and FCSRES fixes it. tested in SIMH so building on real hardware now.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Jean-Yves Bernier wrote:
At 6:13 PM -0400 24/5/14, Cory Smelosky wrote:
CRASH -- CONT WITH SCRATCH MEDIA ON MU000
Any error during build? vmr?
Yeah. Looks like VMR -- *FATAL*-Supervisor mode library not supported
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Damn.
boot [1,54]rsx11m.sys
SYSTEM FAULT DETECTED AT PC=044112 FACILITY=000300 ERROR CODE=000100
CRASH -- CONT WITH SCRATCH MEDIA ON MU000
Oops. Missed this error.
VMR -- *DIAG*-Installed tasks or commons may no longer fit in partition
SET /TOP=DRVPAR:-*
VMR -- *FATAL*-Supervisor mode library not supported
INS [3,54]ICMFSL/INC=10000 ! INDIRECT COMMAND FILE PROCESSOR
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Damn.
boot [1,54]rsx11m.sys
SYSTEM FAULT DETECTED AT PC=044112 FACILITY=000300 ERROR CODE=000100
CRASH -- CONT WITH SCRATCH MEDIA ON MU000
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
At 11:18 PM +0200 24/5/14, Hans Vlems wrote:
The DIX spec says that hardware addresses ( the ones you put in the simh configuration file starting with 08-00-2B) must be unique .
I put no address in my simh conf file.
I tried to change it to -AA-BB-01 as you suggested above. I have now lost ssh access to my emulator and figure how to clear my ARP cache (arp -d -a wont 't do it under OS X).
--
Jean-Yves Bernier
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 05/24/2014 05:14 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Looks like progress!
TIME
17:09:44 24-MAY-14
;
TKB @RSXBLD
I don't recall it getting to this stage before!
Ah-HA, that's the biggie! Crossin' my fingers..
Yup!
It seems to have output less this time and jumped straight to the taskbuilding...it must've preallocated space last round.
-Dave
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 05/24/2014 05:14 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Looks like progress!
TIME
17:09:44 24-MAY-14
;
TKB @RSXBLD
I don't recall it getting to this stage before!
Ah-HA, that's the biggie! Crossin' my fingers..
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
At 10:26 PM +0200 24/5/14, Johnny Billquist wrote:
If I were to guess, there are packets dropped.
I can see the segment counter running backward at times, like this:
23:15:56.109519 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 18
23:15:56.109855 10.2 > 10.1 378 data 45058>40193 seg 19
23:15:56.110118 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 20
23:15:56.110277 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 21
23:15:56.110548 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 22
23:15:56.110736 10.2 > 10.1 364 data 45058>40193 seg 23
23:15:56.196612 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 24
23:15:56.196816 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 25
23:15:56.197113 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 26
23:15:56.197316 10.2 > 10.1 394 data 45058>40193 seg 27
23:16:06.113164 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 20
23:16:06.113458 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 21
23:16:06.113664 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 22
23:16:06.113994 10.2 > 10.1 364 data 45058>40193 seg 23
23:16:06.114152 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 24
23:16:06.114304 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 25
23:16:06.114657 10.2 > 10.1 586 data 45058>40193 seg 26
23:16:06.117048 10.2 > 10.1 394 data 45058>40193 seg 27
--
Jean-Yves Bernier
