On Fri, 30 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:28:59PM -0400, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Oh, and that Cory guy. His tunnel is still broken. *shakes fist at Cory*
Hey! I've been busy! And quite frankly I have no idea what the hell is wrong.
Can you get me ssh access to your router so I can poke around and maybe
see what's going on?
Which one? The Cisco or the edge BSD box?
The Cisco is old enough to only be telnet...;)
-brian
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:12:38PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-30 17:10, Brian Hechinger wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:49:26AM -0400, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
Well, it won't boot on an 11/23 or 11/23+. It also won't initially
offer to do AUTOCONFIGURE. It seems an inbetween baseline executive
was made before distribution.
So as long as I look to emulate a /70 I should be fine?
Yes.
Ok, cool.
The 11/70 normally came in a configuration that requires 3-phase.
However, the actual machine do not need it, it's just a load
balancing thing...
Ah, mine didn't. It was pure 110v.
Maybe it's a cabinet thing?
-brian
On 2014-05-30 17:10, Brian Hechinger wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:49:26AM -0400, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
Well, it won't boot on an 11/23 or 11/23+. It also won't initially
offer to do AUTOCONFIGURE. It seems an inbetween baseline executive
was made before distribution.
So as long as I look to emulate a /70 I should be fine?
Yes.
Now that I have space, I should. :)
Enough for an 11/70? ;)
Yes actually. :)
Cool! You've got three-phase service right? :D
What do I need three-phase for?
And no, no I don't.
The 11/70 normally came in a configuration that requires 3-phase. However, the actual machine do not need it, it's just a load balancing thing...
Johnny
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:28:59PM -0400, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Oh, and that Cory guy. His tunnel is still broken. *shakes fist at Cory*
Hey! I've been busy! And quite frankly I have no idea what the hell is wrong.
Can you get me ssh access to your router so I can poke around and maybe
see what's going on?
-brian
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:49:26AM -0400, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Sun, 25 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
Understandable. It's a lot simpler than IDLE.
IDLE could be interesting though. I might still give it a go anyway. :)
Well, it won't boot on an 11/23 or 11/23+. It also won't initially
offer to do AUTOCONFIGURE. It seems an inbetween baseline executive
was made before distribution.
So as long as I look to emulate a /70 I should be fine?
Now that I have space, I should. :)
Enough for an 11/70? ;)
Yes actually. :)
Cool! You've got three-phase service right? :D
What do I need three-phase for?
And no, no I don't.
-brian
On 2014-05-30 15:18, Bob Armstrong wrote:
The ethernet bridge would, in my eyes be preferred to two or three reliable
PTP links.
In your eyes the bridge program between two nodes, communicating via
psilo, would be preferred to one reliable PtP link between the same two
nodes?
No. Direct links are almost always preferrable. But you scenario would be equally well solved using 3,4,5 as costs. Using 10,20,30 makes several hops over ptp links be preferred over the (one or) two hops on the bridge.
I'd say that the one or two hops on the bridge is better than two ptp links, and might be as good as one hop on a ptp link as well.
Johnny
The ethernet bridge would, in my eyes be preferred to two or three reliable
PTP links.
In your eyes the bridge program between two nodes, communicating via
psilo, would be preferred to one reliable PtP link between the same two
nodes?
Bob
How much work would a limited phase 4 endnode implementation be? Limited : FAL only, no hone, cterm etc.
Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone.
Origineel bericht
Van: Steve Davidson
Verzonden: vrijdag 30 mei 2014 12:48
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: RE: [HECnet] RT-11 DECnet?
DECnet-11/RT-11 came in tape and RX50 distributions. The last version
was Phase-III. Phase-IV was never produced. It really requires the XM
(and variants) monitor and it is BIG... And SLOW... And...
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Cory Smelosky
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 22:12
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] RT-11 DECnet?
Hello,
Now that I've gotten RT-11 rolling on the 11/23...is there
any way to get DECnet rolling on it? I can't find a tape
image anywhere. :(
If I'm going to get stuff copied to this...it's going to help
to have higher than 9600baud going for me. ;)
I suppose I could install the TCP/IP stuff but I've never
actually done that. Would TSX+ run on an 11/23?
Once my cleaning tapes arrive I'm going to install RSTS/E
from one of my DDS-3 tapes via SCSI drive. ;) (Here's hoping
the bootstrap on the SCSI controller does TMSCP bootstrap!)
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
DECnet-11/RT-11 came in tape and RX50 distributions. The last version
was Phase-III. Phase-IV was never produced. It really requires the XM
(and variants) monitor and it is BIG... And SLOW... And...
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Cory Smelosky
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 22:12
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] RT-11 DECnet?
Hello,
Now that I've gotten RT-11 rolling on the 11/23...is there
any way to get DECnet rolling on it? I can't find a tape
image anywhere. :(
If I'm going to get stuff copied to this...it's going to help
to have higher than 9600baud going for me. ;)
I suppose I could install the TCP/IP stuff but I've never
actually done that. Would TSX+ run on an 11/23?
Once my cleaning tapes arrive I'm going to install RSTS/E
from one of my DDS-3 tapes via SCSI drive. ;) (Here's hoping
the bootstrap on the SCSI controller does TMSCP bootstrap!)
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
The DEC calling standards and the design of DECnet do not limit us to
using only one language. Each system could use what ever is available
on that system (and what the user knows how to program in) and use
DECnet objects to pass information back and forth. A simple protocol
(if you will) could be spec'd out and implemented for any of the
languages. A common language could be used for the "glue". MACRO-11
might be fun - it could easily manage the differences between BASIC and
FORTRAN (and others) calling sequences (ie R5).
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Dave McGuire
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 23:59
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Parallel computing using DECnet
On 05/01/2014 11:41 PM, Jovan Trujillo wrote:
Oh man ha ha so we are going to do amazing things with 64kb. Like
those demo scene guys and their commodore 64's. Alright
fractals sound
like a good first project for something like this. ...we do
have 64kb
available right? :)
There are very few PDP-11s that won't kick the living snot
out of a Commodore 64, FYI.
But using FORTRAN, we could potentially use overlays and such.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
