At RULLFS::[.SEM] I typed in some of the code; sem3 doesn't work yet,
but sem2 does and is available at the task server.
Instead of using the graphics library the output is done in... sixels.
An example can be viewed with the sem button at
http://rullf2.xs4all.nl/sg/sg.html
Erik
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 08:34:38AM -0700, Jovan Trujillo wrote:
Ok so the original authors didn't save much from that 20 year old paper,
but they did give me the source code for the mandelbrot set test they
described in their paper. Here is the quick posting of the code on my
webpage:
http://deathrow.vistech.net/~navoj
I was also able to find the message passing libraries they referenced in
the netlib repository. Don't have much time to play with it now since I
have exams.
Enjoy,
Jovan
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 05/02/2014 06:49 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-02 21:03, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 05/02/2014 03:53 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
But using FORTRAN, we could potentially use overlays and such.
Well, overlays do not depend on FORTRAN, you can use that no matter
what
language you choose.
Yes, of course. I don't know what I was thinking. Thank you for the
correction. I myself have only actually used overlays with FORTRAN;
that was probably the source of my error.
:-)
Late at night?
Yep. :-/
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Both would be best most likely.
-brian
On May 30, 2014, at 12:47, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:28:59PM -0400, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Oh, and that Cory guy. His tunnel is still broken. *shakes fist at Cory*
Hey! I've been busy! And quite frankly I have no idea what the hell is wrong.
Can you get me ssh access to your router so I can poke around and maybe
see what's going on?
Which one? The Cisco or the edge BSD box?
The Cisco is old enough to only be telnet...;)
-brian
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
At 11:29 PM +0200 30/5/14, Johnny Billquist wrote:
I have a version of MicroEMACS running under RSX. :-)
Does it handle more than 24 lines?
--
Jean-Yves Bernier
On 2014-05-30 23:59, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 05/30/2014 05:29 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-30 21:14, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Doesn't MicroEMACS run under VMS?
Dunno - I have never used that version. I use JOVE on a PDP-11 (under
2.11bsd), but that's never been ported to VMS AFAIK.
I have emacs 18.51 running just fine on VAX VMS; I didn't think Alpha
would be that hard! Hmm - maybe I should try to find the sources for
that
version.
I have a version of MicroEMACS running under RSX. :-)
Oh shit! Share?
Sent the location in another mail. Let me know if you can't get to it. You also have already task build image there, linked with RMSRES in supervisor mode, and DAPRES.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 05/30/2014 05:29 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-30 21:14, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Doesn't MicroEMACS run under VMS?
Dunno - I have never used that version. I use JOVE on a PDP-11 (under
2.11bsd), but that's never been ported to VMS AFAIK.
I have emacs 18.51 running just fine on VAX VMS; I didn't think Alpha
would be that hard! Hmm - maybe I should try to find the sources for
that
version.
I have a version of MicroEMACS running under RSX. :-)
Oh shit! Share?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Afternoon,
Well, looks like some of my tunnels came up...however surprisingly it's the tunnels of OTHERs that haven't reconnected to me post-IP-change. ;)
Interesting. I will need to debug this further.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-30 23:30, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-30 21:14, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Doesn't MicroEMACS run under VMS?
Dunno - I have never used that version. I use JOVE on a PDP-11
(under
2.11bsd), but that's never been ported to VMS AFAIK.
I have emacs 18.51 running just fine on VAX VMS; I didn't think Alpha
would be that hard! Hmm - maybe I should try to find the sources for
that
version.
I have a version of MicroEMACS running under RSX. :-)
It must be pretty micro. Might be nano or pico at that point. ;)
Well, MicroEMACS V1. Works just fine. Biggest problem is that it requires all the file to be in memory when editing, so I can't edit files much more than 1000 lines under RSX. That limitation wouldn't really be a limitation under VMS... :-)
MIM::DU:[EMACS]
not sure if all the bits for VMS is there, or in functioning order...
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2014-05-30 21:14, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Doesn't MicroEMACS run under VMS?
Dunno - I have never used that version. I use JOVE on a PDP-11 (under
2.11bsd), but that's never been ported to VMS AFAIK.
I have emacs 18.51 running just fine on VAX VMS; I didn't think Alpha
would be that hard! Hmm - maybe I should try to find the sources for that
version.
I have a version of MicroEMACS running under RSX. :-)
It must be pretty micro. Might be nano or pico at that point. ;)
Johnny
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2014-05-30 21:14, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Doesn't MicroEMACS run under VMS?
Dunno - I have never used that version. I use JOVE on a PDP-11 (under
2.11bsd), but that's never been ported to VMS AFAIK.
I have emacs 18.51 running just fine on VAX VMS; I didn't think Alpha
would be that hard! Hmm - maybe I should try to find the sources for that
version.
I have a version of MicroEMACS running under RSX. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2014-05-30 21:08, Bob Armstrong wrote:
the stupid CONFIGURE brain damage.
I saw that - a 500 block DCL script is kinda scary, but at least it
doesn't crash.
Personally, I'm happy with vi on unix and EDT on VMS.
EDT (and EVE) are really only useful to me if I have a real VTxxx
keyboard. My right hand knows all the keypad sequences, and can't be
reprogrammed for any PC key layout.
Agree.
vi is, well, evil. The only command I know is :quit! (gotta have the
bang!) for the few times I accidentally get into it :-)
Agree twice on that. :-)
Emacs is just way too heavyweigh with unnecessary features.
You mean "gnu emacs..." and with that I absolutely agree, but I don't know
any other emacs alternative that's been ported to VMS.
AMIS.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
