HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

15556 discussions

Looking for WWENG2.SYS for DECserver 900TM

by robert.jarratt＠ntlworld.com

Does anyone have this file? (Sorry if this is a duplicate, I sent the request from the wrong address and I don t know if it actually made it to the list) Regards Rob

10 years, 5 months

Possible later BBN Monitor source

by b4＠gewt.net

On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Gregg Levine wrote: Hello! I mean where did you find it. Bitsavers. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

10 years, 5 months

Possible later BBN Monitor source

by gregg.drwho8＠gmail.com

Hello! I mean where did you find it. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Gregg Levine wrote: Hello! And where was it hiding? SRC:<BBN-MONITOR> ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

10 years, 5 months

Possible later BBN Monitor source

by b4＠gewt.net

On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Gregg Levine wrote: Hello! And where was it hiding? SRC:<BBN-MONITOR> ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

10 years, 5 months

Possible later BBN Monitor source

by gregg.drwho8＠gmail.com

Hello! And where was it hiding? ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: Afternoon, To the probably 0 other people interested...I think I managed to stumble across a later version of the BBN monitor...not sure if it's TENEX, just patches to the networking stack. It was (not really) hidden within the SRI-NIC SRC: structure dump. The source contains a copy of BBN Report 5925 -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

10 years, 5 months

Possible later BBN Monitor source

by b4＠gewt.net

Afternoon, To the probably 0 other people interested...I think I managed to stumble across a later version of the BBN monitor...not sure if it's TENEX, just patches to the networking stack. It was (not really) hidden within the SRI-NIC SRC: structure dump. The source contains a copy of BBN Report 5925 -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

10 years, 5 months

TOPS-10/20 copyright status

by hvlems＠zonnet.nl

Verzonden vanaf mijn BlackBerry 10-smartphone. Van: Mark Abene Verzonden: woensdag 19 november 2014 04:42 Aan: hecnet at update.uu.se Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] TOPS-10/20 copyright status You're likely right, and I had it backwards (SC versus Foonly). On the other note, it would be really cool to revive TYMCOM-X and its dev environment (excluding the Tymnet Engine node-code generation tools). But it's very possible that British Telecom wouldn't allow that to happen, if in fact they still hold all the copyrights that they absorbed from acquiring Tymnet and Tymshare. -M On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at update.uu.se> wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:23:38PM -0800, Mark Abene wrote: > > If I remember correctly, Compuserve was using Foonlys towards the end, > since they were much more economical to run than the Systems Concepts > machines. Maybe someone can comment. That sounds backwards. At least the F1 was a very complex machine even requiring a DeC PDP-10 to even boot. The SC-40 was comparatively nimble. Lpok at gerrys youtibe videos. I don't know much about the later foonlys. I'd like to know more. /P

10 years, 5 months

TOPS-10/20 copyright status

by phiber＠phiber.com

You're likely right, and I had it backwards (SC versus Foonly). On the other note, it would be really cool to revive TYMCOM-X and its dev environment (excluding the Tymnet Engine node-code generation tools). But it's very possible that British Telecom wouldn't allow that to happen, if in fact they still hold all the copyrights that they absorbed from acquiring Tymnet and Tymshare. -M On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at update.uu.se> wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:23:38PM -0800, Mark Abene wrote: > > If I remember correctly, Compuserve was using Foonlys towards the end, > since they were much more economical to run than the Systems Concepts > machines. Maybe someone can comment. That sounds backwards. At least the F1 was a very complex machine even requiring a DeC PDP-10 to even boot. The SC-40 was comparatively nimble. Lpok at gerrys youtibe videos. I don't know much about the later foonlys. I'd like to know more. /P

10 years, 5 months

Kermit for RSTS/E

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2014-11-17 07:55, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote: On Nov 15, 2014, at 9:17 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: ... Anyway, K11.TSK is probably not what you want, since all the TSK files on MIM are RSX images. You probably want to grab all the sources, and the command files, and build it yourself. I checked, and there are definitely RSTS/E build files in there. I haven t tried it, at least not much, with RSX images. But the emulation in RSTS is often able to run unmodified images from the other operating systems. It certainly works that way for RT11 emulation. It is true that using a RSTS/E build is preferable, if you can find one, because that will enable some RSTS-specific things. But if all you can find is an RSX image, it s worth a try. Yes, many RSX images will work. And I have not checked if KERMIT do something tricky or not. If it's just plain RSX code, then it could work just fine under RSTS/E. If they use ASTs to actually deal with things in an asynchronous manner, or more odd RSX stuff, then the RSTS/E emulation layer might not be enough. I know that there are separate build files and pieces for RSTS/E in KERMIT-11, and since those files are available, I would just grab it all (from MIM:: for example) and built it myself. Johnny

10 years, 5 months

TOPS-10/20 copyright status

by pontus＠Update.UU.SE

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:23:38PM -0800, Mark Abene wrote: If I remember correctly, Compuserve was using Foonlys towards the end, since they were much more economical to run than the Systems Concepts machines. Maybe someone can comment. That sounds backwards. At least the F1 was a very complex machine even requiring a DeC PDP-10 to even boot. The SC-40 was comparatively nimble. Lpok at gerrys youtibe videos. I don't know much about the later foonlys. I'd like to know more. /P

10 years, 5 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet