At 11:49 AM -0500 8/17/08, Phil Mendelsohn wrote:
Sampsa Laine wrote:
Guys,
I've set up an IRC server for our use on silverback.sampsa.com port 6655 (non-standard port, I know).
I'll be hanging out on channel #hecnet as often as I can.
There's something about using IRC for DEC stuff that strikes me as inconsistent. (I'm being a real DEC/VMS bigot here...)
Better if there were a multi-user version of PHONE. :)
DECNotes isn't real time...
Alas - I'm not entitled to an opinion, since my systems off-line now anyway!
Well the only DECnotes server I'm aware of is currently powered off, and won't be back on HECnet for at least a month. Right now it is so hot most of my stuff is powered down (major heat wave), my Area Router was already off due to a howling fan, and now we're getting ready to move. We hope heat will be less of an issue in the new place, and I'm going to pay more attention to setting things up in such a way that I can stay online all the time. I suspect once I get back online it will be with either a VAXstation 4000/60 or /90 as my area router instead of the /vlc.
ISTR seeing at least IRC clients for VMS, but am not sure. I've never bothered to figure out IRC.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 11:24 -0700, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Does PHONE do multi-user?
It does two people (Well, two people is technically "multi-user" :-)
Seriously, though, PHONE is pretty simple compared to IRC. However,
remember that we are talking antique systems here - it's probably the
closest analog that exists.
At least VMS Phone as of 5.0 does more than two users. But fitting it
all on the 80x24 screen it expects will become progressively less
trivial as users arrive.
-Tore :)
On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 16:37 +0100, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Guys,
I've set up an IRC server for our use on silverback.sampsa.com port
6655 (non-standard port, I know).
I'll be hanging out on channel #hecnet as often as I can.
Although I think that putting up an IRC channel for HECnet is a
fantastic idea, and I'm connecting after hitting "Send" - who knows, it
might lead to the development of a proper VMS-style IRC client - I'm
quite opposed to the "network per channel" thing: It strikes me a bit as
having a mail server for each address, or insisting on setting up a new
computer for every user account.
Can't we please do this on a recognized, stable network - Freenode
(irc.freenode.net) strikes me as being a very nice network for this kind
of thing, and it already has a healthy #vms. I'll be in #hecnet there
myself.
I don't have any active hosts at the moment either - it is still summer!
- but I still feel entitled to whine ;)
Regards,
-Tore :)
Does PHONE do multi-user?
It does two people (Well, two people is technically "multi-user" :-)
Seriously, though, PHONE is pretty simple compared to IRC. However,
remember that we are talking antique systems here - it's probably the
closest analog that exists.
Bob
Does PHONE do multi-user?
Sampsa
On 17 Aug 2008, at 18:58, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Well if you've got a better and more DEC oriented I'm open torunning
that too... :)
There's PHONE, which works on VMS and RSX, at least, maybe more.
Bob
Well if you've got a better and more DEC oriented I'm open torunning
that too... :)
There's PHONE, which works on VMS and RSX, at least, maybe more.
Bob
Well if you've got a better and more DEC oriented I'm open to running that too... :)
Sampsa
On 17 Aug 2008, at 17:49, Phil Mendelsohn wrote:
Sampsa Laine wrote:
Guys,
I've set up an IRC server for our use on silverback.sampsa.com port 6655 (non-standard port, I know).
I'll be hanging out on channel #hecnet as often as I can.
There's something about using IRC for DEC stuff that strikes me as inconsistent. (I'm being a real DEC/VMS bigot here...)
Better if there were a multi-user version of PHONE. :)
DECNotes isn't real time...
Alas - I'm not entitled to an opinion, since my systems off-line now anyway!
--
"Nothing is too small to know, and nothing too big to attempt."
--Sir William Cornelius Van Horne
Sampsa Laine wrote:
Guys,
I've set up an IRC server for our use on silverback.sampsa.com port 6655 (non-standard port, I know).
I'll be hanging out on channel #hecnet as often as I can.
There's something about using IRC for DEC stuff that strikes me as inconsistent. (I'm being a real DEC/VMS bigot here...)
Better if there were a multi-user version of PHONE. :)
DECNotes isn't real time...
Alas - I'm not entitled to an opinion, since my systems off-line now anyway!
--
"Nothing is too small to know, and nothing too big to attempt."
--Sir William Cornelius Van Horne
Guys,
I've set up an IRC server for our use on silverback.sampsa.com port 6655 (non-standard port, I know).
I'll be hanging out on channel #hecnet as often as I can.
Sampsa
Follow up: I "upgraded" to DECnet PhaseIV, everything is working swimmingly.
Sampsa
On 16 Aug 2008, at 01:36, Sampsa Laine wrote:
I have finally managed to get my machine to talk to HECnet, unfortunately I can only access remote machines by their numeric address, not by node name.
I am running DECnet-Plus on OpenVMS 8.3, with the name resolution set to local. Any idea how I can get this to resolve PhaseIV addresses?
Sampsa
