Now correct me if I'm wrong but at least my bridge setup file has a DNS address in it, not an IP address. Will Johnny's bridge not work against a DynDNS type setup?
Sampsa
On 18 Aug 2008, at 21:28, Fred wrote:
Hello all ...
After a bit of communication with a list member off-list, it seems that my dynamic IP address scenario is going to throw a wrench into the works regarding getting on to HECNet. Would someone know of a dynamic-address friendly method? I have DSL here, and switching to cable isn't an option as they block ports and are generally nasty around here. Static DSL is a last resort option as I'd rather not double my DSL bill if I don't have to.
I do not want anyone to have to "babysit" my connection to the network - if there's any babysitting to be done, I'll do it - or write some DCL to automate it, or what-have-you.
Do I have any options?
Cheers,
Fred
Hello all ...
After a bit of communication with a list member off-list, it seems that my dynamic IP address scenario is going to throw a wrench into the works regarding getting on to HECNet. Would someone know of a dynamic-address friendly method? I have DSL here, and switching to cable isn't an option as they block ports and are generally nasty around here. Static DSL is a last resort option as I'd rather not double my DSL bill if I don't have to.
I do not want anyone to have to "babysit" my connection to the network - if there's any babysitting to be done, I'll do it - or write some DCL to automate it, or what-have-you.
Do I have any options?
Cheers,
Fred
Fred wrote:
that is runinng DECNet over IP
that could allow me onto the network.
There are several ways to do DECnet over IP, including Multinet, Johnny's
bridge program, certain models of Cisco routers, and Linux DECnet, plus
maybe more that I don't know about. Unfortunately none of them are really
compatible, so you'll have to say which one you want to use before we can
help.
If you're using Multinet, then I'll be glad to connect you.
BTW, I notice your "dyndns" address - most of these aren't really usable
unless you have a static IP. All these connection methods are based on
actual IPs and not DNS entries, so anytime your dynamic IP changed the guy
at the other end of your tunnel would have to reconfigure your connection.
That gets old pretty fast.
Bob
Good afternoon:
Recently acquired an AlphaStation 255/233 and put OpenVMS 8.3 on it, got SMTP working, lots of layered products, etc. Was wondering if there is an area router nearby (Ohio, United States, although I realize it doesn't necessarily have to be "nearby") that is runinng DECNet over IP that could allow me onto the network.
Feel free to ask what my system specifics are and such. I fully expect to have to change my network number, but hopefully not my node name (which is MISER).
Cheers,
Fred
I've always meant to check if PHONE handles if you set yor terminal to more than 24 lines as well... Maybe I should check now... :-)
I'm pretty sure it doesn't. As I recall, PHONE uses the SCR$ library which was quite limited and only supported 24 rows. That was one of the improvements available by using the SMG$ library (as well as being able to use custom-defined terminals in TERMTABLE).
--Marc
Sampsa Laine wrote:
Got any notes on that?
I don't have my notes any more ... it was a long time ago now! But the
source is freely available, and (I hope) fairly easy to follow. The
commands are all single byte (see common.h) and the rest is plain text.
The download URL is
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/linux-decnet/dnprogs-2.43.tar.gz?modtime=1…
On 18 Aug 2008, at 08:06, Christine Caulfield wrote:
Sampsa Laine wrote:
Just to get a feel for it, does anyone know if PHONE exposes any kind of
API that would be possible to code against? I wouldn't mind having a go
at learning more about VMS coding and trying to make a PHONE->IRC
adapter.
I don't think phone has an API - but I did reverse-engineer the protocol
for Linux and it's fairly simple.
--
Chrissie
--
Chrissie
Got any notes on that?
Sampsa
On 18 Aug 2008, at 08:06, Christine Caulfield wrote:
Sampsa Laine wrote:
Just to get a feel for it, does anyone know if PHONE exposes any kind of
API that would be possible to code against? I wouldn't mind having a go
at learning more about VMS coding and trying to make a PHONE->IRC adapter.
I don't think phone has an API - but I did reverse-engineer the protocol
for Linux and it's fairly simple.
--
Chrissie
Sampsa Laine wrote:
Just to get a feel for it, does anyone know if PHONE exposes any kind of
API that would be possible to code against? I wouldn't mind having a go
at learning more about VMS coding and trying to make a PHONE->IRC adapter.
I don't think phone has an API - but I did reverse-engineer the protocol
for Linux and it's fairly simple.
--
Chrissie
Phil Mendelsohn skrev:
Tore Sinding Bekkedal wrote:
At least VMS Phone as of 5.0 does more than two users. But fitting it
all on the 80x24 screen it expects will become progressively less
trivial as users arrive.
You can always set your VT to 132 column... ;)
I've always meant to check if PHONE handles if you set yor terminal to more than 24 lines as well... Maybe I should check now... :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Sampsa Laine wrote:
Just to get a feel for it, does anyone know if PHONE exposes any kind of API that would be possible to code against? I wouldn't mind having a go at learning more about VMS coding and trying to make a PHONE->IRC adapter.
The beauty of VMS (when used properly) is that this should all be handled through system calls; the API for "everything" *is* the OS. (Though plenty of folks {found|find} wheels to reinvent) ;)
--
"Nothing is too small to know, and nothing too big to attempt."
--Sir William Cornelius Van Horne
