Well the BBS is not running on VMS but CHIMPY does have an account (B4BBS) that automagically connects to the service.
The BBS runs as a Win2k VM on the same physical machine as GORVAX.
Sampsa
PS: Check out http://sampsa.com/b4bbs/ - there's Flash-based PC-ANSI emulator on that (the ANSI used by BBS software
tends to break stuff on more "normal" emulators)
On 28 Aug 2009, at 19:38, Zane H. Healy wrote:
Isn't one of these a system with a Fidonet BBS? I've been wanting to check
that out, but only just got back on HECnet.
Zane
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Guys,
GORVAX and CHIMPY will be down from tomorrow morning onwards - the ISP has indicated that the new DSL will be active within 5 working days.
Anyone who is relying on GORVAX for routing will obviously be affected.
Sampsa
Isn't one of these a system with a Fidonet BBS? I've been wanting to check
that out, but only just got back on HECnet.
Zane
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Guys,
GORVAX and CHIMPY will be down from tomorrow morning onwards - the ISP has indicated that the new DSL will be active within 5 working days.
Anyone who is relying on GORVAX for routing will obviously be affected.
Sampsa
Guys,
GORVAX and CHIMPY will be down from tomorrow morning onwards - the ISP has indicated that the new DSL will be active within 5 working days.
Anyone who is relying on GORVAX for routing will obviously be affected.
Sampsa
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Paul Koning<Paul_Koning at dell.com> wrote:
It would depend on how big "the whole business" is.
I looked in http://elvira.stacken.kth.se/rsts/rsts_80th_birthday.html
for a memory refresh. DECnet/E appeared in RSTS/E V6C. That was Phase
II -- no routing, DMC/DMR only. For 2 or 3 nodes, that was a useable
version.
Phase III (single level routing) appeared in V7.1. (That was my project
-- first RSTS/E project I worked on if you ignore a week on PIP in the
V6B timeframe.) That would serve for installations up to about 250
nodes. DMP/DMV support was added, including multipoint.
Ethernet support and DECnet phase IV (level 1 routing and endnode only,
no area routing) appeared in V9.3. It took so long because it was hard
to convince management to allow the work in the first place. There was
a sentiment that Ethernet wasn't interesting for PDP-11s, and/or that no
RSTS system lived in a network bigger than a few dozen nodes (so Phase
IV wasn't needed). The latter argument may have been valid -- I never
did run into any really large DECnet networks apart from the one inside
DEC.
So anyway... unless you want lots of nodes, or multi-area addressing,
Phase III will serve which means V7.1 or later is ok. Oh yes, you do
need DDCMP then. Ethernet or Phase IV require 9.3 or later; async DDCMP
requires 10.0 or later.
paul
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Gregg Levine
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:10 AM
To: hecnet at update.uu.se
Subject: [HECnet] What DEC created operating systems support the
networking protocol used?
Hello!
I've managed to track down several examples of the RSTS family of
operating systems from DEC. Would any of you have any clew as to which
member specifically spoke the networking protocol that we use here to
communicate within the whole business? These were of course for the
PDP-11.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature was once found posting rude
messages in English in the Moscow subway."
Hello!
That thoroughly answers my questions. Thank you Paul. Incidentally
Johnny the examples came up on a posting to the list for the SIMH
family of emulators, tapes et cetera from the RSTS fan site,
http://www.rsts.org .
On that site the author mentions that the collection would work on
John Wilson's excellent E11 emulator, so I'm not surprised that the
individual there had gotten the whole thing to work on his SIMH
emulation kit, except for some interesting problems.
Of course the next problem is working out the details for creating
this whole business for doing so, I imagine that a commodity router
who's got my current Ethernet network all wired together would not do
that. I would need a Cisco setup for that purpose.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature was once found posting rude
messages in English in the Moscow subway."
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:53:00PM -0400, John Wilson wrote:
hobby users can use the Demo version of E11 (for Linux or any other host OS)
for free, indefinitely. It has some cripples, but it's still pretty luxurious
compared to any real PDP-11 system I ever had...
Foo, no Solaris version, and my Linux VM doesn't appear to have enough RAM set to
it.
Guess it's time to finally get Linux installed on that old laptop of mine. :)
-brian
--
"Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta
tell them exactly what you want or you'll end up with a cupboard full of
pop tarts and pancake mix." -- IRC User (http://www.bash.org/?841435)
It would depend on how big "the whole business" is.
I looked in http://elvira.stacken.kth.se/rsts/rsts_80th_birthday.html
for a memory refresh. DECnet/E appeared in RSTS/E V6C. That was Phase
II -- no routing, DMC/DMR only. For 2 or 3 nodes, that was a useable
version.
Phase III (single level routing) appeared in V7.1. (That was my project
-- first RSTS/E project I worked on if you ignore a week on PIP in the
V6B timeframe.) That would serve for installations up to about 250
nodes. DMP/DMV support was added, including multipoint.
Ethernet support and DECnet phase IV (level 1 routing and endnode only,
no area routing) appeared in V9.3. It took so long because it was hard
to convince management to allow the work in the first place. There was
a sentiment that Ethernet wasn't interesting for PDP-11s, and/or that no
RSTS system lived in a network bigger than a few dozen nodes (so Phase
IV wasn't needed). The latter argument may have been valid -- I never
did run into any really large DECnet networks apart from the one inside
DEC.
So anyway... unless you want lots of nodes, or multi-area addressing,
Phase III will serve which means V7.1 or later is ok. Oh yes, you do
need DDCMP then. Ethernet or Phase IV require 9.3 or later; async DDCMP
requires 10.0 or later.
paul
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Gregg Levine
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:10 AM
To: hecnet at update.uu.se
Subject: [HECnet] What DEC created operating systems support the
networking protocol used?
Hello!
I've managed to track down several examples of the RSTS family of
operating systems from DEC. Would any of you have any clew as to which
member specifically spoke the networking protocol that we use here to
communicate within the whole business? These were of course for the
PDP-11.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature was once found posting rude
messages in English in the Moscow subway."
Hi.
Gregg Levine wrote:
Hello!
I've managed to track down several examples of the RSTS family of
operating systems from DEC. Would any of you have any clew as to which
member specifically spoke the networking protocol that we use here to
communicate within the whole business? These were of course for the
PDP-11.
I think that it was less than a week since Paul Konig said that DECnet
phsse IV came in V9, or if it even was V10 of RSTS/E. Ie. very new
versions only.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Hello!
I've managed to track down several examples of the RSTS family of
operating systems from DEC. Would any of you have any clew as to which
member specifically spoke the networking protocol that we use here to
communicate within the whole business? These were of course for the
PDP-11.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature was once found posting rude
messages in English in the Moscow subway."
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Brian Hechinger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:18:45PM -0400, Marc Chametzky wrote:
I'm now sitting on a 20Mbit/5Mbit Commercial FIOS line, so I have more
bandwidth than I know what to do with. I am noticing that DECnet
performance seems drastically improved.
Ain't FiOS grand? I've had FiOS here for about a year and a half and
have loved it.
You both suck.
That is all.
:)
-brian (stuck in cablemodem land)
You should see my monthly Internet bill! To get the same level of service I
had with my ISP and DSL, I'm stuck paying more than twice as much, plus I
still have an account with my ISP to keep my email. Given the choice, I
would much rather have my old slow DSL.
Zane
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:18:45PM -0400, Marc Chametzky wrote:
I'm now sitting on a 20Mbit/5Mbit Commercial FIOS line, so I have more
bandwidth than I know what to do with. I am noticing that DECnet
performance seems drastically improved.
Ain't FiOS grand? I've had FiOS here for about a year and a half and
have loved it.
You both suck.
That is all.
:)
-brian (stuck in cablemodem land)
--
"Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta
tell them exactly what you want or you'll end up with a cupboard full of
pop tarts and pancake mix." -- IRC User (http://www.bash.org/?841435)