Sorry, guys - that reply-to is always catching me out.
I suppose it might be worth opening the query up to the list anyway -
any good reason why I shouldn't be able to connect the Digital UNIX
implementation of DECnet/OSI to HECnet?
The Software Product Description attached to the previous email has more
details of the implementation.
Regards, Mark.
--
Actually, it might be worth casting your eye over the SPD to see if this
implementation of DECnet would be supported by your bridge.
I've attached the SPD.
Regards, Mark.
Anyone have a copy of the SPL for Ultrix Vax online anywhere. I was
sure I had it on cd somewhere, but I can't find it. Something late
would be good. I've got 4.5 installed.
Thanks
Dan
At 3:21 PM +0000 12/10/09, Mark Wickens wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 07:16 -0800, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> I'm curious, what is so special about v3.4c? I ran v5.something
briefly, but that was about 10 years ago, and I don't remember if I
ever had it talking DECnet.
Nothing, especially, except that it was the version I used on the very
same machine I'll be installing it on - between 1994 and 1997.
Okay, that makes sense.
Oh, well, possibly the fact that is says DIGITAL rather than Compaq.
Does that make it special? ;)
Yes.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 07:16 -0800, Zane H. Healy wrote:
At 3:04 PM +0000 12/10/09, Mark Wickens wrote:
Has anyone tried connecting Digital Unix to HECnet.
I thought I'd give it a go once I've downgraded from 4.0
Regards, Mark.
I'm curious, what is so special about v3.4c? I ran v5.something
briefly, but that was about 10 years ago, and I don't remember if I
ever had it talking DECnet.
Nothing, especially, except that it was the version I used on the very
same machine I'll be installing it on - between 1994 and 1997.
Oh, well, possibly the fact that is says DIGITAL rather than Compaq.
Does that make it special? ;)
Mark
At 3:04 PM +0000 12/10/09, Mark Wickens wrote:
Has anyone tried connecting Digital Unix to HECnet.
I thought I'd give it a go once I've downgraded from 4.0
Regards, Mark.
I'm curious, what is so special about v3.4c? I ran v5.something briefly, but that was about 10 years ago, and I don't remember if I ever had it talking DECnet.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
Ian McLaughlin wrote:
I suppose replacing the RRD40 with a RRD42 would still leave the
equipment in a configuration that was once shipped by DEC. Does anyone
have a RRD42 for sale? (I have caddies for it!)
I don't know if the InfoServer 100 ever came with the RRD42, but the InfoServer 150 *certainly* did.
Peace... Sridhar
I suppose replacing the RRD40 with a RRD42 would still leave the equipment in a configuration that was once shipped by DEC. Does anyone have a RRD42 for sale? (I have caddies for it!)
Ian.
On 2009-12-08, at 12:05 PM, Sridhar Ayengar wrote:
Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Steve,
My infoserver 100 definitely does not take the NEC style - it takes the
two-part style. The PDF here:
I believe the one that takes the "standard" caddy is the RRD42, which, incidentally, is something like three times faster than the RRD40.
Peace... Sridhar
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=0A725CFAE43511DEB…
Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Steve,
My infoserver 100 definitely does not take the NEC style - it takes the
two-part style. The PDF here:
I believe the one that takes the "standard" caddy is the RRD42, which, incidentally, is something like three times faster than the RRD40.
Peace... Sridhar
