The UNIX box that is still running is a Pentium III that is close to 10 years old, and honestly probably on its last legs. I don't think it could handle a VAX instance. I've considered this, and if I do it, it will be using a new Intel Atom board, but I have my doubts on the ability of that class board to handle the load of a SIMH instance.
Zane
At 9:49 AM +0000 3/9/10, Sampsa Laine wrote:
You could always get a SIMH VAX instance running on the UNIX box...
Sampsa
On 9 Mar 2010, at 03:39, Zane H. Healy wrote:
At some point over the past few days MONK lost his power supply. Additionally I wasn't sure what the state of PDXVAX was, as MONK was my primary method of access, and the console wasn't responding so I pulled the plug on PDXVAX and powered off both systems drive arrays.
While I have to try to bring MONK back up at some point to recover data (thankfully I have a second XP1000), I don't think I'll be leaving it running 24x7 anymore. I was already thinking about shutting down my servers to save power.
Right now my UNIX server is the only one still running, and I'm preparing to copy the data off, and redirect my DNS back to my .Mac account like I had it last Winter while we were house-hunting. I really don't have time to keep my own servers running anymore.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
You could always get a SIMH VAX instance running on the UNIX box...
Sampsa
On 9 Mar 2010, at 03:39, Zane H. Healy wrote:
At some point over the past few days MONK lost his power supply. Additionally I wasn't sure what the state of PDXVAX was, as MONK was my primary method of access, and the console wasn't responding so I pulled the plug on PDXVAX and powered off both systems drive arrays.
While I have to try to bring MONK back up at some point to recover data (thankfully I have a second XP1000), I don't think I'll be leaving it running 24x7 anymore. I was already thinking about shutting down my servers to save power.
Right now my UNIX server is the only one still running, and I'm preparing to copy the data off, and redirect my DNS back to my .Mac account like I had it last Winter while we were house-hunting. I really don't have time to keep my own servers running anymore.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
At some point over the past few days MONK lost his power supply. Additionally I wasn't sure what the state of PDXVAX was, as MONK was my primary method of access, and the console wasn't responding so I pulled the plug on PDXVAX and powered off both systems drive arrays.
While I have to try to bring MONK back up at some point to recover data (thankfully I have a second XP1000), I don't think I'll be leaving it running 24x7 anymore. I was already thinking about shutting down my servers to save power.
Right now my UNIX server is the only one still running, and I'm preparing to copy the data off, and redirect my DNS back to my .Mac account like I had it last Winter while we were house-hunting. I really don't have time to keep my own servers running anymore.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
Do DECNET proxies work for this as well, so if I've got a proxy set up between two systems, the remote user gets the appropriate privs?
Sampsa
On 22 Feb 2010, at 14:29, Steve Davidson wrote:
The task object mechanism works great! I have used this with FORTRAN when I supported it for DEC.
-Steve
________________________________
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE on behalf of Kari Uusim ki
Sent: Mon 2/22/2010 08:43
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] REXEC-type feature over DECNET?
On 22.2.2010 14:05, Sampsa Laine wrote:
is there any simple way to execute a command on another DECNET node
remotely, a la rexec or ssh?
Sampsa
.
Yes, indeed.
You can use the TASK object to execute a command at a remote DECnet node.
Maybe it is best that you read through the chapter 8 of the DECnet for
OpenVMS networking manual:
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/73final/documentation/pdf/DECNET_OVMS_NET_MAN…
Kari
<winmail.dat>
The task object mechanism works great! I have used this with FORTRAN when I supported it for DEC.
-Steve
________________________________
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE on behalf of Kari Uusim ki
Sent: Mon 2/22/2010 08:43
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] REXEC-type feature over DECNET?
On 22.2.2010 14:05, Sampsa Laine wrote:
is there any simple way to execute a command on another DECNET node
remotely, a la rexec or ssh?
Sampsa
.
Yes, indeed.
You can use the TASK object to execute a command at a remote DECnet node.
Maybe it is best that you read through the chapter 8 of the DECnet for
OpenVMS networking manual:
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/73final/documentation/pdf/DECNET_OVMS_NET_MAN…
Kari
On 22.2.2010 14:05, Sampsa Laine wrote:
is there any simple way to execute a command on another DECNET node
remotely, a la rexec or ssh?
Sampsa
.
Yes, indeed.
You can use the TASK object to execute a command at a remote DECnet node.
Maybe it is best that you read through the chapter 8 of the DECnet for OpenVMS networking manual:
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/73final/documentation/pdf/DECNET_OVMS_NET_MAN…
Kari
Sampsa Laine wrote:
is there any simple way to execute a command on another DECNET node remotely, a la rexec or ssh?
Not sure about VMS, but in RSX this can all be controlled from software. There is a library of functions to run, abort and fool around with tasks on other hosts.
There are also parts available from the command line:
.nft /he
NFT is the Network File Transfer utility. It can perform file
transfers and file operations over the network.
Information is available for the following operations:
APPEND (/AP) .............. File Append commands
COPY ...................... File Transfer commands
DELETE (/DE) .............. File Deletion commands
DEFAULTS (/DF) ............ Set/Examine Defaults commands
DIRECTORY (/AT,/BR,/LI,/FU) Directory list commands
EXECUTE (/EX) ............. File Execution commands
IDENTIFY (/ID) ............ Identify commands
PROTECTION (/PR)........... File Protection commands
RENAME (/RE) .............. File Rename command
SPOOL (/SP) ............... File Spooling commands
SUBMIT (/SB) .............. File Submission commands
And the following subjects:
DATA CHECKING (/DC) ....... Remote file transfer data checking
FILESPECS ................. File Specification syntax
NODE NAMES ................ Node and Access control syntax
MODES (/AS,/AX,/BK,/IM,/RC) File transfer Mode switches
QUOTES .................... Quoting foreign filespecs
SWITCHES .................. NFT switch summary
VERSION NUMBERS ........... Version number processing
.
So, you can both run, submit to the spooler or the batch, files to remote machines.
Johnny
Mark Wickens wrote:
Hi guys,
I've now secured an internet connection for the DEC Legacy event in April and wanted to pick your collective brains about what might be interesting to hecnet hobbyists who won't be able to attend the event if we can get some of the machines that will be in attendance connected up to hecnet on the day.
A couple of my machines will be there - probably the VAX 4000/90 and either the DEC 3000/600 or the ZX6000 itanium workstation - I'm presuming I'll need to supply an updated IP address for Jonny to patch me in given that my bridge will be on a different IP address? Also, would it be possible for those attendees who've not been connected previously to get connected up on the day, given that they won't have to worry about the bridge setup?
Would anyone fancy participating in a coding competition? Anyone have any other suggestions?
Hi, Mark.
Sounds like fun. Too bad I'm not there. :-)
I see no real problems with hooking this up to HECnet. Technically it is easy, as long as we have a defined endpoint to hook up to.
The rest is mostly a question of making sure that any machines getting online are configured with an acceptable DECnet address, or else it might become confusion and bad karma.
Coding competitions? Doing what? DECnet programs?
If you accept someone doing something from an RSX, sure. I might be game. ;-)
I'm writing a totally new mail client and server right now. At the moment it will only talk local and DECnet, but in the longer run, it will also be able to talk TCP/IP, once I get down and fix a few things in my TCP/IP for RSX.
That will also create a totally new gateway between DECnet and IP, in which I have control of all the code, and knows how it works and can fix things... :-)
I hate not having the sources of things. When I find problems, things always gets so much more complicated...
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol