I'm working on a DCL script to produce a phone directory on SLAVE.
It's coming on nicely, but I'm a bit perplexed by one line in the example PHONEDIR.COM script.
Can anyone tell me what the significance of the "=29" is on this line:
$ open/read/write slave 'node'"29="
Ta,
Mark.
On 10 Oct 2011, at 21:30, Mark Wickens wrote:
I was talking to someone at the DEC Legacy event about the erosion of DEC kit in Universities and Colleges after Microsoft's anti-trust law suit the settlement of which required Microsoft to give away copies of Windows.
DEC didn't follow suit.
Ironic that an anti-trust settlement against Microsoft just ended up with more people running Microsoft software, which locked them into Microsoft upgrade paths.
--
Mark Benson
My Blog:
<http://markbenson.org/blog>
Follow me on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/mdbenson
"Never send a human to do a machine's job..."
I think Royal Holloway (Uni. London) still uses a pair of 4100s for student registration and print management.
That was a few years ago though.
On 10 Oct 2011, at 21:30, Mark Wickens wrote:
On 10/10/11 17:43, MG wrote:
On 10-10-2011 17:49, Mark Wickens wrote:
Randomly found this site: http://vms.cc.wmich.edu/www/openvms.html
Nice example of VMS still out in the wild...
What do you mean by 'still'?
- MG
I was talking to someone at the DEC Legacy event about the erosion of DEC kit in Universities and Colleges after Microsoft's anti-trust law suit the settlement of which required Microsoft to give away copies of Windows.
DEC didn't follow suit.
On 10/10/11 17:43, MG wrote:
On 10-10-2011 17:49, Mark Wickens wrote:
Randomly found this site: http://vms.cc.wmich.edu/www/openvms.html
Nice example of VMS still out in the wild...
What do you mean by 'still'?
- MG
I was talking to someone at the DEC Legacy event about the erosion of DEC kit in Universities and Colleges after Microsoft's anti-trust law suit the settlement of which required Microsoft to give away copies of Windows.
DEC didn't follow suit.
I've heard the supply of those has been depleted... (sorry couldn't resist).
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:45 PM, MG <marcogb at xs4all.nl> wrote:
On 1-10-2011 16:54, Brian Hechinger wrote:
You should be able to replace the CPUs with uranium if you wanted to (and could find/afford uranium system boards) no?
No, I wouldn't put uranium in your system...
- MG
On 1-10-2011 16:54, Brian Hechinger wrote:
You should be able to replace the CPUs with uranium if you wanted to (and could find/afford uranium system boards) no?
No, I wouldn't put uranium in your system...
- MG
On 10-10-2011 17:49, Mark Wickens wrote:
Randomly found this site: http://vms.cc.wmich.edu/www/openvms.html
Nice example of VMS still out in the wild...
What do you mean by 'still'?
- MG
uBLISS made it to (internal) field-test. I don't remember how much
further it got. That's how I got a chance to use it. No commitment was
made as to how much of a subset would finally be delivered but at the
time I did not care. I thought that even as slow as it was it was a
blast to play with. I remember submitting uBLISS jobs to RSX-11M-PLUS
systems (ASTRIX:: and OBELIX::), (Corporate Operations Group, Software
Services), while doing real work. It worked for me!
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Tim Sneddon
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 10:19
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] BLISS-16?
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 15:57 +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Hi, Steve.
Looking for the cross compiler. (Like I said, BLISS-16 for
VMS... :-) ).
I've seen one reference for uBLISS, but I have no idea of
the status
of
Micro-BLISS was a BLISS compiler that ran on the PDP-11.
However, it was not at all successful. Given the size of the
BLISS compiler much of the optimisations, etc. had to be
removed to make it all fit. I don't believe it was actually
completed as a project.
that one. Was it even usable? Why did DEC not use it internally for
the Bliss stuff for PDP-11s?
PDP-11 BLISS was either written on a PDP-10 or VAX. The
PDP-11 Fortran IV compiler was written in BLISS-11. DECnet
was written in the Common BLISS dialect.
Tim.
Internally, that compiler was known as BLISS-16C (C for cross-compiler).
The TRANSF utility in RT-11 was eventually written in BLISS-16C (and
common BLISS) so that one source pool could be maintained across the
various operating systems (RT-11, RSX-11, VAX/VMS).
EDT (I was the project leader for V3.10) used BLISS-16C for the builds
on RSX-11M, IAS-11, and RSTS/E (RSX run-time environment) and BLISS-32
(eventually BLISS-64) for VMS.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 10:14
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] BLISS-16?
All of RMS-11 is written in BLISS-16. Parts of the RSX kernel
is written in BLISS-16, and also parts of DECnet-RSX is
written in BLISS-16.
Cross-compiled on VMS, and the result transferred back to the
RSX system for the full build. Listings and stuff from the
BLISS-16 compiles are distributed as a part of the RSX distribution.
Johnny
On 2011-10-10 16.01, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote:
I don't know that DEC used Bliss at all for PDP-11
software. The only place I ever saw it was in an Algol-68
compiler written at Carnegie-Mellon (the original
perpetrators of Bliss). That was a different edition,
though, called Bliss-11 and hosted on a PDP-10.
paul
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 9:58 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] BLISS-16?
Hi, Steve.
Looking for the cross compiler. (Like I said, BLISS-16 for
VMS... :-) ).
I've seen one reference for uBLISS, but I have no idea of
the status of that one. Was it even usable? Why did DEC not
use it internally for the Bliss stuff for PDP-11s?
Johnny
On 2011-10-10 15.55, Steve Davidson wrote:
Johnny,
Are you looking for the cross compiler (BLISS-16C) that ran on VAX
(VMS) generating code for the 11's, or are you looking for the
compiler that ran directly on the 11's (uBLISS AKA microBLISS)?
BLISS-16C while hard to find may be available, the other
one I have
only seen (and used) once in the 80's while at DEC and
don't expect it to be available anywhere.
I will check to see if I have a copy of either, but it may
take a while!
I'm not sure what condition the tapes I have are in - it has been
decades since they were last accessed.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 22:09
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] BLISS-16?
Do anyone have BLISS-16 for VMS? I guess it might be bundled with
BLISS-32, but I don't know. I would like to test it some,
and I have
a VAX box running VMS, but my distribution CDs are far
away, and I
don't know if I have BLISS in there, but I thought I'd start by
asking here before I try to get access to CDs 2000 km away...
Johnny
