SOL (59.10) =>NI-0-0 / QNA-0 <= STUPI (59.58) 2.49 -1 -1 1.26
STUPI (59.58) =>TCP-0-4 / TCP-0-4 <= CODA (2.7) 0.51 -1 -1 0.37
CODA (2.7) =>TCP-0-7 / TCP-0-0 <= GORVAX (1.400) 2.50 -1 -1 1.44
GORVAX (1.400) =>QNA-0 / ISA-0 <= ORAC (1.250) 1.50 4 1 1.50
Any chance you talk "multinet" or "cisco" encapsulation of DECnet over
IP, as I think we are making a detour Sweden-UK...
..and, why not talk smtp over DECnet transport, we used to do that
1988 or so to avoid having -not-needed- rewites of addresses...
-P
Ps; SOL is also Sol.Stupi.SE
Hi Peter,
Sorry, you'll have to explain what you're asking me. Johnny set up ORAC
connectivity - I don't think there is anything unusual going on, but if
you tell me how to look for it I can investigate.
Regards, Mark.
SOL (59.10) =>NI-0-0 / QNA-0 <= STUPI (59.58) 2.49 -1 -1 1.26
STUPI (59.58) =>TCP-0-4 / TCP-0-4 <= CODA (2.7) 0.51 -1 -1 0.37
CODA (2.7) =>TCP-0-7 / TCP-0-0 <= GORVAX (1.400) 2.50 -1 -1 1.44
GORVAX (1.400) =>QNA-0 / ISA-0 <= ORAC (1.250) 1.50 4 1 1.50
Any chance you talk "multinet" or "cisco" encapsulation of DECnet over
IP, as I think we are making a detour Sweden-UK...
..and, why not talk smtp over DECnet transport, we used to do that
1988 or so to avoid having -not-needed- rewites of addresses...
-P
Ps; SOL is also Sol.Stupi.SE
Circuit QNA-0, Adjacent node = 1.15 (PONDUS)
--
Also I've looked at CHIMP and it seems there's the same problem there:
--
$ NCP SHO ADJ NOD
Node Volatile Summary as of 15-OCT-2009 07:57:24
Node State Active Delay Circuit Next node
Links
1.15 (PONDUS) EWA-0 1.15 (PONDUS)
$
$ NCP SHO ADJ NOD
Node Volatile Summary as of 15-OCT-2009 07:57:25
Node State Active Delay Circuit Next node
Links
1.13 (MIM) 1 3 EWA-0 1.13 (MIM)
$
--
Btw, how non-routing node decides which of routing nodes should be adjacent node?
