batch printing by automating turning on the printer once a day, clearing
the print queue, and then turning the printer off. I've got the facility
to programmatically turn the power on and off. The printer would be
connected to a DECserver 90M.
Any ideas?
Regards, Mark
----Originalmeddelande----
Fr n:hvlems at zonnet.nl
S nt: 2011.12.31, 17.09
Till:hecnet at Update.UU.SE
mne:[HECnet] excel files
Some mailboxes cannot handle the size of the spreadsheet files.
They are now also on OZON::
Hans
Hops
SOL (59.10) =>NI-0-0 / QNA-0 <= STUPI (59.58) 8.50 -1
-1
4.27
STUPI (59.58) =>TCP-0-1 / TCP-0-59<= GORVAX (8.400) 2.52 -1
-1
1.34
GORVAX (8.400) =>TCP-0-2 / TCP-0-8 <= LEGATO (2.1) 4.52 -1
-1
2.40
How come STUPI is talking to LEGATO via GORVAX, when STUPI has a direct
Multinet connection to LEGATO? It could have done it in one hop, and
instead it chose two.
Answer: because the circuit costs are screwed up. With redundant paths
you have to be really careful about how you set your circuit costs in order
to get the routings that you want; otherwise you'll get foolish results like
this.
In this case it's the received metric. But, we got redundancy, just
not optimal routng..-:)
Setting the metrics in Hecnet is a bit tricky, as the "ethernet
bridges" are invisible to DECnet routing.
Here is a suggestion....
Set all multinet links to metric 5 in both ends.
Set all bridged ethnert interfacec to 10
??
The NETPTH executable you have runs on 36 bit machines?
Yeppp...
It's really a shame that there's not a VAX version.
But it just does a buch of NML show;s and matches the links...
-P
Hops
SOL (59.10) =>NI-0-0 / QNA-0 <= STUPI (59.58) 8.50 -1
-1
4.27
STUPI (59.58) =>TCP-0-1 / TCP-0-59<= GORVAX (8.400) 2.52 -1
-1
1.34
GORVAX (8.400) =>TCP-0-2 / TCP-0-8 <= LEGATO (2.1) 4.52 -1
-1
2.40
How come STUPI is talking to LEGATO via GORVAX, when STUPI has a direct
Multinet connection to LEGATO? It could have done it in one hop, and
instead it chose two.
Answer: because the circuit costs are screwed up. With redundant paths
you have to be really careful about how you set your circuit costs in order
to get the routings that you want; otherwise you'll get foolish results like
this.
The NETPTH executable you have runs on 36 bit machines? It's really a
shame that there's not a VAX version.
Bob
Hops
LEGATO (2.1) =>QNA-1 /
?NETPTH Connection rejected, reason:
No response from destination process
$netpth
NETPTH>frugal=legato
[Routing path from LEGATO (2.1) to FRUGAL (33.14)]
