Saw your note on Hecnet about MVS and DecNet
I've run MVS 3.8J on Hercules for years on Macs and PCs (usually on Linux)
ISTR that DEC had an interface that sat on the IBM channel and looked like a 3274 control unit --- I also remember going to a demo at DEC late in their life and watching the product crash over and over :-)
The place I worked ended up installing TCPIP on the 370s to talk to the Vaxen - I believe it was a port of the Stanford or UCLA code (don't remember which).
Anyone who needed terminal access to the mainframe went thru the Vax that was the gateway.
Sterling Garwood
slgarwood at charter.net
Yeah, I think it's VTAM. Not sure what / how to connect it beyond the local box though, might need some IBM network voodoo box or something.
Sampsa
On 4 Aug 2012, at 16:29, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Any way to connect this to DECnet? Maybe over over DECNet-OSI since the
thing natively does VTAM?
I don't know about DECnet, but the reverse is possible - DEC had an SNA
gateway product. Good luck :-)
Bob
Any way to connect this to DECnet? Maybe over over DECNet-OSI since the
thing natively does VTAM?
I don't know about DECnet, but the reverse is possible - DEC had an SNA
gateway product. Good luck :-)
Bob
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, Sampsa Laine wrote:
For various reasons to do with my general mental stability etc, I decided to learn about IBM mainframes, so got one running..
Hi Sampsa,
Are you running Turnkey?
I have VM/370 (well, 380 actually) and MVS/380 running here. I play with it occasionally. I also run MUSIC/SP on a Windows XP VM I have (cause it's the only way I can get TCP/IP working with MUSIC since it's not supported from what I can tell on Hercules). I'd like to get them interfaced to mail (I remember using PROFS (which I know is licensed) at a former job) or actually do *something* remotely useful with it ... :)
Let me know if you make any headway.
Fred
I don't think the freeware MVS comes with SNA, as that's a commercial product.
Could set up some captive accounts to run TN3270 on GORVAX I suppose.
Sampsa
On 4 Aug 2012, at 15:53, Kari Uusim ki wrote:
How about the SNA gateway, which DEC built just for that need?
On 4.8.2012 13:38, Sampsa Laine wrote:
For various reasons to do with my general mental stability etc, I decided to learn about IBM mainframes, so got one running..
Any way to connect this to DECnet? Maybe over over DECNet-OSI since the thing natively does VTAM?
Details: http://sampsa.com/2012/08/04/mvs-on-an-s390-because-openvms-is-just-too-eas…
.
How about the SNA gateway, which DEC built just for that need?
On 4.8.2012 13:38, Sampsa Laine wrote:
For various reasons to do with my general mental stability etc, I decided to learn about IBM mainframes, so got one running..
Any way to connect this to DECnet? Maybe over over DECNet-OSI since the thing natively does VTAM?
Details: http://sampsa.com/2012/08/04/mvs-on-an-s390-because-openvms-is-just-too-eas…
.
Guys,
I've been reimplementing an old 80s BBS package called Waffle in Python (called Pyffle).
Anyway, it's accessible over HECNET as the host name PYFFLE, log in as pyffle at the Unix prompt.
Sampsa
When I boot my 3-machine SimH VAXcluster, my MOP booted VAX system I
am seeing this:
%VAXcluster, system loaded from node DARMOK (AA-00-04-00-33-18)
%SYSBOOT-I-SYSBOOT Mapping the SYSDUMP.DMP on the System Disk
%SYSBOOT-I-SYSBOOT SYSDUMP.DMP on System Disk successfully mapped
%SYSBOOT-I-SYSBOOT Mapping PAGEFILE.SYS on the System Disk
%SYSBOOT-I-SYSBOOT SAVEDUMP parameter not set to protect the PAGEFILE.SYS
OpenVMS (TM) VAX Version V7.3 Major version id = 1 Minor version id = 0
%WBM-I-WBMINFO Write Bitmap has successfully completed initialization.
%SYSINIT, waiting to form or join a VMScluster system
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system PIVAX2
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Port has Closed Virtual Circuit - REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE PIVAX2
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE PIVAX2
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE PIVAX2
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE PIVAX2
%CNXMAN, lost connection to system DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE PIVAX2
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system PIVAX2
%CNXMAN, now a VAXcluster member -- system PIVAX3
%CNXMAN, re-established connection to system DARMOK
Is this;
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
%PEA0, Excessive packet losses on LAN Path from XQA to XQA on REMOTE NODE DARMOK
normal? It seems to happen at boot in the same place in the sequence.
I wonder if it's the OS bootstrap reconfiguring the XQA0: interface?
I don't know, though, just looked odd.
--
Mark
*chuckle*
I had an IBM 850 that was afair a 120 or 133mhz 604 or 603e with 32mb ram that a mate grabbed a few years back so he could try it. Think he still keeps it with his extensive collection of Motorola power-stacks.
Al
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Jason Stevens Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2012 4:54 PM To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] Webserver for Ultrix
I used it on PPC RS/6000's ... all the "advantages" of windows, without being able to run any x86 code.. which for IIS was a 'good thing' .. Naturally the day after I showed it off to management, IBM dropped support for PowerPC NT... Then so did Microsoft.
Qemu can run the MIPS version of NT which is fun to run from time to time... but just how much do you like NT 4.0 sp1???
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Boyanich, Alastair <Alastair.Boyanich at au.fujitsu.com> wrote:
.. feel free to cast the first stone at me $etc.. But on the topic of IIS, was NT 3.x and 4.x ever running on anything SPIM by DEC .. or was it purely the MIPS Magnum's? (Certainly the only place I've seen it on non-alpha/x86) Al.
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On > Behalf Of Dave McGuire > Sent: Tuesday, 24 July 2012 1:38 PM > To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE > Subject: Re: [HECnet] Webserver for Ultrix > > On 07/23/2012 08:59 PM, Joe Ferraro wrote: > > More modern than 65% of market share in 2012? > > Yeah, really! > > > Lets see.... IIS -- nope (why would you?!?)... > > P.T. Barnum has an explanation for those who do. ;) > > > nginx? doubtful... > > Who? ;) > > > Hey.... Johnny wrote a very "modern" web server in the "recent" > > (equivocal) sense of the word... perhaps it would compile under Ultrix! > > Now THAT would be fun to port. ;) > > -Dave > > -- > Dave McGuire, AK4HZ > New Kensington, PA