On 2012-08-06 09:06, Dan Williams wrote:
On 17 July 2012 21:18, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2012-07-16 02:42, Dan Williams wrote:
Hi,
I don't know who is updating the records at the moment. But I now have
machines up and running, they should be up 24x7
51.1 slimer zx6000 VMS V8.3-1H1
51.2 Walter zx6000 VMS V8.3-1H1
51.3 dana simh VMS V7.3
51.4 gozer IBM 911-285 Debian Squeeze
51.5 ray 4000/90 VMS V7.3
By the way, I assume this means all previous definitions in area 51 are
invalid, and were deleted. Let me know if I was wrong. The old ones you had
conflicted with this list.
Johnny
Hi,
I don't know how I missed this email. Yes all old definitions are invalid.
Good.
What is the best machine to copy a current node list from ?
MIM::
Johnny
On 6 Aug 2012, at 08:06, Dan Williams wrote:
On 17 July 2012 21:18, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2012-07-16 02:42, Dan Williams wrote:
Hi,
I don't know who is updating the records at the moment. But I now have
machines up and running, they should be up 24x7
51.1 slimer zx6000 VMS V8.3-1H1
51.2 Walter zx6000 VMS V8.3-1H1
51.3 dana simh VMS V7.3
51.4 gozer IBM 911-285 Debian Squeeze
51.5 ray 4000/90 VMS V7.3
By the way, I assume this means all previous definitions in area 51 are
invalid, and were deleted. Let me know if I was wrong. The old ones you had
conflicted with this list.
Johnny
Hi,
I don't know how I missed this email. Yes all old definitions are invalid.
What is the best machine to copy a current node list from ?
1.13 (MIM) is usually the most up to date, I think.
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
On 5 Aug 2012, at 21:05, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 08/05/2012 01:02 PM, Mark Benson wrote:
The following nodes have changed name on Area 6 (not that anyone can see then right now ^_^)
6.51 DARMOK
6.54 JALAD
No Tinagra? ;)
That's the name of the cluster :)
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
On 17 July 2012 21:18, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2012-07-16 02:42, Dan Williams wrote:
Hi,
I don't know who is updating the records at the moment. But I now have
machines up and running, they should be up 24x7
51.1 slimer zx6000 VMS V8.3-1H1
51.2 Walter zx6000 VMS V8.3-1H1
51.3 dana simh VMS V7.3
51.4 gozer IBM 911-285 Debian Squeeze
51.5 ray 4000/90 VMS V7.3
By the way, I assume this means all previous definitions in area 51 are
invalid, and were deleted. Let me know if I was wrong. The old ones you had
conflicted with this list.
Johnny
Hi,
I don't know how I missed this email. Yes all old definitions are invalid.
What is the best machine to copy a current node list from ?
Dan
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2012-08-05 23:04, Peter Lothberg wrote:
Is area 9 free?
I might grab that for some testing purposes if nobody minds.
(Basically MULTINET point to point over tun/tap from the S/390 to the
host, host on my main area 8, S/390 on 9. S/390 has no concept of an
ethernet card..)
Sampsa
NCP>tell stupi:: show areA 9
NCP>
23:01:12 NCP
Request # 215 Accepted
NCP>
23:01:13 NCP
Request # 215; Show Area Summary Completed, Unrecognized component,
Entity = Area
And there are no nodenames defined in area 9, I think it's safe to
use, knock yourself out! (Johnny might have a special use in mind...)
Nope, I have nothing marked for area 9. Curious what putting a S/390 in its
own area gains you (sampsa), though, except potential problems... :-)
Johnny
Hello!
Let's just say there is a lot of strange noise hanging over his flat.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On 2012-08-05 23:04, Peter Lothberg wrote:
Is area 9 free?
I might grab that for some testing purposes if nobody minds.
(Basically MULTINET point to point over tun/tap from the S/390 to the host, host on my main area 8, S/390 on 9. S/390 has no concept of an ethernet card..)
Sampsa
NCP>tell stupi:: show areA 9
NCP>
23:01:12 NCP
Request # 215 Accepted
NCP>
23:01:13 NCP
Request # 215; Show Area Summary Completed, Unrecognized component,
Entity = Area
And there are no nodenames defined in area 9, I think it's safe to
use, knock yourself out! (Johnny might have a special use in mind...)
Nope, I have nothing marked for area 9. Curious what putting a S/390 in its own area gains you (sampsa), though, except potential problems... :-)
Johnny
Is area 9 free?
I might grab that for some testing purposes if nobody minds.
(Basically MULTINET point to point over tun/tap from the S/390 to the host, host on my main area 8, S/390 on 9. S/390 has no concept of an ethernet card..)
Sampsa
NCP>tell stupi:: show areA 9
NCP>
23:01:12 NCP
Request # 215 Accepted
NCP>
23:01:13 NCP
Request # 215; Show Area Summary Completed, Unrecognized component,
Entity = Area
And there are no nodenames defined in area 9, I think it's safe to
use, knock yourself out! (Johnny might have a special use in mind...)
-P
Is area 9 free?
I might grab that for some testing purposes if nobody minds.
(Basically MULTINET point to point over tun/tap from the S/390 to the host, host on my main area 8, S/390 on 9. S/390 has no concept of an ethernet card..)
Sampsa
On 08/05/2012 04:45 PM, Bob Armstrong wrote:
Too long. :)
Temba works, though.
Somebody spent too much of their childhood in front of the TV :-)
I sometimes have an episode of Trek playing in a window as I'm coding
or drawing schematics.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
