Are there collectors there that collect the Soviet clones?
I don't collect them specifically, but I have one of the Elektronika
BK0010, just like the one in this picture -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bk0010-01-sideview.jpg
The computer and keyboard is pretty nice, although the power supply is a bit
klunky. The latter looks like it was made about 1965 instead of 1985.
I also have a complete set of manuals for it, in Russian, if anybody is
interested in translating them. They're print so I'll have to scan them,
but I'm willing to do that.
Bob
...
Are there collectors there that collect the Soviet clones?
I particularly wonder about the ones from STIMTI -- I have a scan of one of their marketing documents -- in 2 languages plus 2 more for summary. Unfortunately, I don't read either of the 2 main ones (Russian and Lithuanian).
If anyone wants to see it I can send over the file.
paul
On 2013-05-17 10:18, Erik Olofsen wrote:
Hi Johnny,
These are the additional fields of my machines that are connected:
RULCRI 28.1 ETM33-BD 5/366 OpenVMS 7.2
RULLF2 28.5 DEC 3000 Model 300 LX OpenVMS 6.1
RULLF 28.26 VAXStation 3100 VAX/VMS 5.5-2
RULLFS 28.41 SIMH VAX/VMS 5.5-2
These are located in Oegstgeest, The Netherlands.
Thank you,
Erik
Thanks everyone. The database is slowly being populated. :-)
To remind everyone - you can see how it looks at http://madame.update.uu.se/~bqt/nodedb
Johnny
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:28:34PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
This is a totally volontary thing. I've finally come to the point where
I think that there are a few more pieces of data on nodes that would be
nice/useful to have from time to time.
So I've extended the nodename database on MIM for this.
The fields that I have added are CPU, OS and location. You can see an
example of values by going to
http://madame.update.uu.se/~bqt/hecnet?node=mim
So, feel free to submit data to me for nodes you know. Or look up
information. Or suggest interfaces that you'd like to get to extract
this information, and I'll try and comply. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
17.05.2013 12:16, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Are there collectors there that collect the Soviet clones?
I don't know about large collections.( And about small either. Unfortunately...
--
Fedor
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Experiments
Hi Johnny,
These are the additional fields of my machines that are connected:
RULCRI 28.1 ETM33-BD 5/366 OpenVMS 7.2
RULLF2 28.5 DEC 3000 Model 300 LX OpenVMS 6.1
RULLF 28.26 VAXStation 3100 VAX/VMS 5.5-2
RULLFS 28.41 SIMH VAX/VMS 5.5-2
These are located in Oegstgeest, The Netherlands.
Thank you,
Erik
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:28:34PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
This is a totally volontary thing. I've finally come to the point where
I think that there are a few more pieces of data on nodes that would be
nice/useful to have from time to time.
So I've extended the nodename database on MIM for this.
The fields that I have added are CPU, OS and location. You can see an
example of values by going to
http://madame.update.uu.se/~bqt/hecnet?node=mim
So, feel free to submit data to me for nodes you know. Or look up
information. Or suggest interfaces that you'd like to get to extract
this information, and I'll try and comply. :-)
Johnny
On Fri, 17 May 2013, Fedor Konstantinov wrote:
Johnny, please update:
SKNLIN; 14.1; Fedor Konstantinov; i686 (xen); Linux; Russia/Moscow;
SKNRSX; 14.2; Fedor Konstantinov; PDP-11/93 (simh); RSX-11M-PLUS V4.6;
Russia/Moscow;
SKNRSE; 14.3; Fedor Konstantinov; PDP-11/93 (simh); RSTS/E V10.1;
Russia/Moscow;
I bet you wouldn't have trouble cooling a real PDP-11 in a Russian winter. ;)
Are there collectors there that collect the Soviet clones?
--
Fedor
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Experiments
Al 16/05/13 23:58, En/na Johnny Billquist ha escrit:
Are you sure it talks ok with the routing node? I mean, have you actually used any protocol to test, or just noted the adjacency up messages? The reason I ask is that the adjacency up messages are not really enough to be sure that the link really is working.
Well, the node appears in the $SHOW NET/OLD of all the routers in the net (adjacent or not), so the router (level-1) gets its address and broadcasts it as expected, but any access attempt (either with SET HOST or NFT/FAL) dails with a timeout for every node excepting the physically adjacent (the ones at the same virtual ethernet).
If I bridge that ethernet to the rest of my "backbone" (hehehe) then everyone can access the TOPS-10 node (as expected).