Pretty cool. What is the server based on, if I may ask? Is it a particular commercial system or "home built"?
John H. Reinhardt
On 12/24/2013 3:41 AM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Guys,
I'm about to migrate all my stuff into a data centre with a symmetric 1 Gbps pipe and the server I'm hosting on is pretty chunky, 16 Xeons at 3 GHz and 64 GB of RAM.
Anyway, I'm happy to slice of off five or six VMs for people who need them with the following features:
- Real static public IP address, with up to 12 port mappings (tcp/udp) from the outside
- 100 GB disk
- 1 Xeon CPU
- 1.5 GB RAM
- Full root access to your VM
- SSH (pubkey auth only) account on the VM host
- VNC access to the console via SSH
So if you have a project in mind that could use something like this, feel free to fire me a personal email (to sampsa at mac.com) and I'll probably roll out a VM for you (the migration will only happen mid-late Jan, but I can arrange slower speed access and control for those who want to get started early).
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +20 11 2150 2266
Guys,
I'm about to migrate all my stuff into a data centre with a symmetric 1 Gbps pipe and the server I'm hosting on is pretty chunky, 16 Xeons at 3 GHz and 64 GB of RAM.
Anyway, I'm happy to slice of off five or six VMs for people who need them with the following features:
- Real static public IP address, with up to 12 port mappings (tcp/udp) from the outside
- 100 GB disk
- 1 Xeon CPU
- 1.5 GB RAM
- Full root access to your VM
- SSH (pubkey auth only) account on the VM host
- VNC access to the console via SSH
So if you have a project in mind that could use something like this, feel free to fire me a personal email (to sampsa at mac.com) and I'll probably roll out a VM for you (the migration will only happen mid-late Jan, but I can arrange slower speed access and control for those who want to get started early).
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +20 11 2150 2266
On 12/23/2013 10:46 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Ahh, got it. I have a bru64k.tap file that I think came from the same
place. If you have a brusys.tap file, would you please send me a copy?
I can't seem to find that anywhere.
Did you try booting the BRU64K tape? Sounds like that should be a BRUSYS
system as well.
Not sure what the correct name is. I know it by BRUSYS, but there might
be some slight difference between the 11M and M+ standalone BRU, or it
might just be different versions of the same.
BRU64K also rings some bell, so I think I've seem that name as well.
I booted it. It seems BRU64K does not support MU: devices. The
"regular" BRUSYS does. I don't know what other differences there may be.
Ok. I was mainly concerned about the stuff fitting...I'm assuming
4.2/4.3 are larger than 4.1. 4.1 was the last version I ran.
I've found the relevant sections of the documentation and am reading
it now.
Excellent.
Progress! I've restored the DL installation set under simh, moved the
RL02 disk images over to a (real) VAX, written them to RL02 packs, and
am running a sysgen on a (real) PDP-11/24. It's midway through the
assembly of the executive. I took a crappy phone pic:
http://www.neurotica.com/misc/pdp1124-rsx-sysgen-20131223.jpg
(yes, that bottom RL02 really is dirty...I'll clean it soon)
I wish I still had that tape, but sadly it was lost many years ago.
Distribution tape for 4.1? I thought you had 4.3 anyway, so what would
you use 4.1 for?
I wouldn't...but it was a pristine, original DEC RSX-11M distribution
tape, and those don't exactly grow on trees.
Thank you Johnny. I'm sure I will have other questions as I become
reacquainted with RSX.
No problems. Feel free to ask anything.
Thank you!
First question: I'd like to try to get DECnet running on this system,
if possible, to get it on HECnet. I've never run DECnet under RSX
before. I could put a DEUNA in the machine, but I am running short of
slots. I have a DELUA, but I don't recall sysgen asking about DELUAs.
Are they compatible at the driver level? Meaning, if I re-do my sysgen
to include a DEUNA driver, will that work with a DELUA?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 2013-12-23 21:13, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 12/23/2013 06:35 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
1) Has anyone been able to install the RSX-11M v4.3 distribution
that's floating around? The tape doesn't seem to be bootable.
The normal distribution was on two tapes. One small tape was bootable,
and contains BRUSYS, while the larger tape is the actual distribution,
in the form of a BRU tape, which is not bootable.
If you don't have the BRUSYS tape, pretty much any version of BRUSYS
should be fine to use. As well as running BRU on an already installed
system, to just restore the first saveset from the tape to a fresh disk,
and then boot that.
Ahh, got it. I have a bru64k.tap file that I think came from the same
place. If you have a brusys.tap file, would you please send me a copy?
I can't seem to find that anywhere.
Did you try booting the BRU64K tape? Sounds like that should be a BRUSYS system as well.
Not sure what the correct name is. I know it by BRUSYS, but there might be some slight difference between the 11M and M+ standalone BRU, or it might just be different versions of the same.
BRU64K also rings some bell, so I think I've seem that name as well.
2) Is it possible to install RSX-11M v4.2 or v4.3 onto a dual-RL02
system? The initial BRU restoration bombs on running out of disk space,
unsurprisingly. I'd like to get this going for a real (non-emulated)
system which has two RL02 drives.
Yes. I've done this. It might be that you need some special dealings. It
should be in the system installation manual.
Ok. I was mainly concerned about the stuff fitting...I'm assuming
4.2/4.3 are larger than 4.1. 4.1 was the last version I ran.
I've found the relevant sections of the documentation and am reading
it now.
Excellent.
(I know v4.1 will run on two RL02s, because I ran it decades ago...but
I no longer have that distribution tape)
Nothing have changed on that front, as far as I can remember.
Ok. Actually it was late when I typed that, and I misremembered...I
actually ran 4.1 on two RL01s, not two RL02s. I had a 4.1 distribution
tape, and I took it to a friend's place where he had a system with a
magtape drive and an RL01 drive. The distribution was the one that
restored onto a set of RL01 packs, five packs I think, and then you run
the sysgen from those, and when you're done, one of those packs is your
new system disk.
Yeah. I've run 11M from two RL02 drives. I think it turned into a five packs setup at system generation, but apart from the swapping of packs from time to time, it worked fine.
I wish I still had that tape, but sadly it was lost many years ago.
Distribution tape for 4.1? I thought you had 4.3 anyway, so what would you use 4.1 for?
Thank you Johnny. I'm sure I will have other questions as I become
reacquainted with RSX.
No problems. Feel free to ask anything.
Oh, and if someone wonder about MIM, I have identified some weird bug in the TCP code that I' investigating, so right now MIM might be a bit unstable, and I've turned off most TCP services.
Johnny
On 12/23/2013 03:16 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Dave McGuire wrote:
Which sysem are you installing this on?
PDP-11/24 and/or PDP-11/34
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Dave McGuire wrote:
Which sysem are you installing this on?
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 12/23/2013 06:35 AM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
1) Has anyone been able to install the RSX-11M v4.3 distribution
that's floating around? The tape doesn't seem to be bootable.
The normal distribution was on two tapes. One small tape was bootable,
and contains BRUSYS, while the larger tape is the actual distribution,
in the form of a BRU tape, which is not bootable.
If you don't have the BRUSYS tape, pretty much any version of BRUSYS
should be fine to use. As well as running BRU on an already installed
system, to just restore the first saveset from the tape to a fresh disk,
and then boot that.
Ahh, got it. I have a bru64k.tap file that I think came from the same
place. If you have a brusys.tap file, would you please send me a copy?
I can't seem to find that anywhere.
2) Is it possible to install RSX-11M v4.2 or v4.3 onto a dual-RL02
system? The initial BRU restoration bombs on running out of disk space,
unsurprisingly. I'd like to get this going for a real (non-emulated)
system which has two RL02 drives.
Yes. I've done this. It might be that you need some special dealings. It
should be in the system installation manual.
Ok. I was mainly concerned about the stuff fitting...I'm assuming
4.2/4.3 are larger than 4.1. 4.1 was the last version I ran.
I've found the relevant sections of the documentation and am reading
it now.
(I know v4.1 will run on two RL02s, because I ran it decades ago...but
I no longer have that distribution tape)
Nothing have changed on that front, as far as I can remember.
Ok. Actually it was late when I typed that, and I misremembered...I
actually ran 4.1 on two RL01s, not two RL02s. I had a 4.1 distribution
tape, and I took it to a friend's place where he had a system with a
magtape drive and an RL01 drive. The distribution was the one that
restored onto a set of RL01 packs, five packs I think, and then you run
the sysgen from those, and when you're done, one of those packs is your
new system disk.
I wish I still had that tape, but sadly it was lost many years ago.
Thank you Johnny. I'm sure I will have other questions as I become
reacquainted with RSX.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Got it after deciphering the helpfile a bit :)
ACCOUNT /SUMMARY/REPORT=(BUFFERED_IO,DIRECT_IO,ELAPSED,EXECUTION,PROCESSOR,QIOS)
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +44 7961 149465
On 22 Dec 2013, at 19:13, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Back years ago I managed to get the ACCOUNT command to produce me a nice list of CPU time used, images executed and disk i/o performed per account, but can not for the life of me remember the syntax.
Any of you gurus out there able to help?
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +44 7961 149465
Back years ago I managed to get the ACCOUNT command to produce me a nice list of CPU time used, images executed and disk i/o performed per account, but can not for the life of me remember the syntax.
Any of you gurus out there able to help?
sampsa <sampsa at mac.com>
mobile +44 7961 149465
On 12/21/2013 09:50 PM, Joe Ferraro wrote:
JOSHUA is a TOPS20 box... for which I don't think a port of tetris exists :)
Well, get to work! :)
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA