=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kari_Uusim=E4ki?= <uusimaki at exdecfinland.org> writes:
On 2.10.2013 23:27, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Kari Uusim=E4ki wrote:
On 2.10.2013 23:11, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Hello,
I finally managed yo get a console working on this...so I want to get=
it
on to HECnet again
However when booting from CD-ROM: %SYSBOOT-E-System version mismatch
found EXEC_INIT.EXE
What am I forgetting to do?
It would be much easier to diagnose if you would describe how you are
doing
the boot, with which parameters and in which phase you get the error
message.
Even better to post the whole booting session output from your console=
.
Simply: boot dka300 (DKA300 is the CD-ROM)
Depends...
Issue a "SHOW DEVICE" at the dead sargent and post the output.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
On 2.10.2013 23:27, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Kari Uusim ki wrote:
On 2.10.2013 23:11, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Hello,
I finally managed yo get a console working on this...so I want to get it
on to HECnet again
However when booting from CD-ROM: %SYSBOOT-E-System version mismatch
found EXEC_INIT.EXE
What am I forgetting to do?
It would be much easier to diagnose if you would describe how you are
doing
the boot, with which parameters and in which phase you get the error
message.
Even better to post the whole booting session output from your console.
Simply: boot dka300 (DKA300 is the CD-ROM)
It does this shortly after loading the boot images. 7.2 gets
further...but it BUGCHKs before entering BACKUP.
Are you sure you have the SCSI bus intact and terminated accordingly?
And your installation media (CD-ROM) is known to be working?
Kari
Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> writes:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Kari Uusim=E4ki wrote:=0D
=0D
On 2.10.2013 23:11, Cory Smelosky wrote:=0D
Hello,=0D
=0D
I finally managed yo get a console working on this...so I want to get it=
=0D
on to HECnet again=0D
=0D
However when booting from CD-ROM: %SYSBOOT-E-System version mismatch=0D
found EXEC_INIT.EXE=0D
=0D
What am I forgetting to do?=0D
=0D
=0D
It would be much easier to diagnose if you would describe how you are doi=
ng =0D
the boot, with which parameters and in which phase you get the error mess=
age.=0D
Even better to post the whole booting session output from your console.=
=0D
=0D
=0D
Simply: boot dka300 (DKA300 is the CD-ROM)=0D
=0D
It does this shortly after loading the boot images. 7.2 gets =0D
further...but it BUGCHKs before entering BACKUP.=0D
Are these OPenVMS installation disks you burned yourself? Are you trying
to read these with an RD45 or earlier?
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Kari Uusim ki wrote:
On 2.10.2013 23:11, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Hello,
I finally managed yo get a console working on this...so I want to get it
on to HECnet again
However when booting from CD-ROM: %SYSBOOT-E-System version mismatch
found EXEC_INIT.EXE
What am I forgetting to do?
It would be much easier to diagnose if you would describe how you are doing the boot, with which parameters and in which phase you get the error message.
Even better to post the whole booting session output from your console.
Simply: boot dka300 (DKA300 is the CD-ROM)
It does this shortly after loading the boot images. 7.2 gets further...but it BUGCHKs before entering BACKUP.
Kari
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
On 2.10.2013 23:11, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Hello,
I finally managed yo get a console working on this...so I want to get it
on to HECnet again
However when booting from CD-ROM: %SYSBOOT-E-System version mismatch
found EXEC_INIT.EXE
What am I forgetting to do?
It would be much easier to diagnose if you would describe how you are doing the boot, with which parameters and in which phase you get the error message.
Even better to post the whole booting session output from your console.
Kari
Hello,
I finally managed yo get a console working on this...so I want to get it on to HECnet again
However when booting from CD-ROM: %SYSBOOT-E-System version mismatch found EXEC_INIT.EXE
What am I forgetting to do?
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net Personal stuff
http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects
Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> writes:
=20
Not at all. One can even run X11 over LAT!
=20
So when they talk about LAT support they're not going to fall back into =
some kind of VT220 emulator but try to actually connect to an X11 server =
over LAT? How do you tell DECwindows to even answer those requests?
I'm not quite following your question. LAT is just a transport just like
TCP/IP and DECnet. Why do you thing there should be any issue with an X11
client and the X11 server? It's transparent to them.
--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG
Well I speak to machines with the voice of humanity.
Fantastic. I remember reading that a long long time ago, just when we were phasing the VMS machines and terminals out in favour of Ultrix DECstations and VAXstations.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
This book is hilarious, and can be copied from CHIMPY::UGH.PDF over HECnet.
sampsa
Not at all. One can even run X11 over LAT!
So when they talk about LAT support they're not going to fall back into some kind of VT220 emulator but try to actually connect to an X11 server over LAT? How do you tell DECwindows to even answer those requests?
sampsa
Brian, how do you think this is going? Are we going to get them to hook =
up?
I do believe so. There are some other things concerning Eisner that need
to be addressed before connection to HECnet (not involving the connection)
but I'm not at liberty to discuss them publicly. It's nothing ominous, so
just sit tight.
Good to hear that! Something I've been considering for a while is that if they were to join, should we invite their whole userbase to the HECnet mailing list or possibly just the EISNER adminds?
I personally think the admins would make a better choice, there are lists like DECTEK for general DEChead stuff.
